Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 129

1.

A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.

Dowd KP, Szeklicki R, Minetto MA, Murphy MH, Polito A, Ghigo E, van der Ploeg H, Ekelund U, Maciaszek J, Stemplewski R, Tomczak M, Donnelly AE.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Feb 8;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0636-2. Review.

2.

Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis.

Qin J, Barbour KE, Nevitt MC, Helmick CG, Hootman JM, Murphy LB, Cauley JA, Dunlop DD.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Feb;50(2):277-283. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001433.

PMID:
28976494
3.

Investigating the relationship between energy expenditure, walking speed and angle of turning in humans.

McNarry MA, Wilson RP, Holton MD, Griffiths IW, Mackintosh KA.

PLoS One. 2017 Aug 10;12(8):e0182333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182333. eCollection 2017.

4.

Design and Evaluation of a Computer-Based 24-Hour Physical Activity Recall (cpar24) Instrument.

Kohler S, Behrens G, Olden M, Baumeister SE, Horsch A, Fischer B, Leitzmann MF.

J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 30;19(5):e186. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7620.

5.

Light and sporadic physical activity overlooked by current guidelines makes older women more active than older men.

Amagasa S, Fukushima N, Kikuchi H, Takamiya T, Oka K, Inoue S.

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 May 2;14(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0519-6.

6.

Physical Activity Assessment with the ActiGraph GT3X and Doubly Labeled Water.

Chomistek AK, Yuan C, Matthews CE, Troiano RP, Bowles HR, Rood J, Barnett JB, Willett WC, Rimm EB, Bassett DR Jr.

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Sep;49(9):1935-1944. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001299.

PMID:
28419028
7.

Prediction of oxygen uptake dynamics by machine learning analysis of wearable sensors during activities of daily living.

Beltrame T, Amelard R, Wong A, Hughson RL.

Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 5;7:45738. doi: 10.1038/srep45738.

8.

Accuracy and Adoption of Wearable Technology Used by Active Citizens: A Marathon Event Field Study.

Pobiruchin M, Suleder J, Zowalla R, Wiesner M.

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 Feb 28;5(2):e24. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6395.

9.

A Web-Based Physical Activity Intervention for Spanish-Speaking Latinas: A Costs and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Larsen B, Marcus B, Pekmezi D, Hartman S, Gilmer T.

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 22;19(2):e43. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6257.

10.

Activity and Sedentary Time 10 Years After a Successful Lifestyle Intervention: The Diabetes Prevention Program.

Rockette-Wagner B, Storti KL, Dabelea D, Edelstein S, Florez H, Franks PW, Montez MG, Pomeroy J, Kriska AM; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group.

Am J Prev Med. 2017 Mar;52(3):292-299. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

PMID:
27887769
11.

Aerobic system analysis based on oxygen uptake and hip acceleration during random over-ground walking activities.

Beltrame T, Hughson RL.

Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2017 Jan 1;312(1):R93-R100. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00381.2016. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

12.

The relationships between golf and health: a scoping review.

Murray AD, Daines L, Archibald D, Hawkes RA, Schiphorst C, Kelly P, Grant L, Mutrie N.

Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;51(1):12-19. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096625. Epub 2016 Oct 3. Review.

13.
14.

Actical Accelerometry Cut-Points for Quantifying Levels of Exertion: Comparing Normal and Overweight Adults.

Giffuni J, McMurray RG, Schwartz T, Berry D.

Int J Exerc Sci. 2012 Apr 15;5(2):170-182. eCollection 2012.

15.

Alterations in energy balance from an exercise intervention with ad libitum food intake.

Melzer K, Renaud A, Zurbuchen S, Tschopp C, Lehmann J, Malatesta D, Ruch N, Schutz Y, Kayser B, Mäder U.

J Nutr Sci. 2016 Mar 9;5:e7. doi: 10.1017/jns.2015.36. eCollection 2016.

16.

Physical Activity Levels and Domains Assessed by Accelerometry in German Adolescents from GINIplus and LISAplus.

Smith MP, Berdel D, Nowak D, Heinrich J, Schulz H.

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 24;11(3):e0152217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152217. eCollection 2016.

17.

Comparative evaluation of features and techniques for identifying activity type and estimating energy cost from accelerometer data.

Kate RJ, Swartz AM, Welch WA, Strath SJ.

Physiol Meas. 2016 Mar;37(3):360-79. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/37/3/360. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

18.

Validity and reliability of Nike + Fuelband for estimating physical activity energy expenditure.

Tucker WJ, Bhammar DM, Sawyer BJ, Buman MP, Gaesser GA.

BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2015 Jun 30;7:14. doi: 10.1186/s13102-015-0008-7. eCollection 2015.

19.

Comparing GPS, Log, Survey, and Accelerometry to Measure Physical Activity.

James P, Weissman J, Wolf J, Mumford K, Contant CK, Hwang WT, Taylor L, Glanz K.

Am J Health Behav. 2016 Jan;40(1):123-31. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.40.1.14.

20.

A virtual reality intervention (Second Life) to improve weight maintenance: Rationale and design for an 18-month randomized trial.

Sullivan DK, Goetz JR, Gibson CA, Mayo MS, Washburn RA, Lee Y, Ptomey LT, Donnelly JE.

Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Jan;46:77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.11.019. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

Supplemental Content

Support Center