Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 105


Choosing between randomised and non-randomised studies: a systematic review.

Britton A, McKee M, Black N, McPherson K, Sanderson C, Bain C.

Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(13):i-iv, 1-124. Review. No abstract available.


A multi-centre randomised controlled trial of minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting for proximal stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.

Reeves BC, Angelini GD, Bryan AJ, Taylor FC, Cripps T, Spyt TJ, Samani NJ, Roberts JA, Jacklin P, Seehra HK, Culliford LA, Keenan DJ, Rowlands DJ, Clarke B, Stanbridge R, Foale R.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Apr;8(16):1-43.


Does off-pump or minimally invasive coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Bainbridge D, Cheng D, Martin J, Novick R; Evidence-based Peri-operative Clinical Outcomes Research (EPiCOR) Group..

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007 Mar;133(3):623-31. Review.


Treatment of stable angina: medical and invasive therapy--implications for the elderly.

Scheidt S.

Am J Geriatr Cardiol. 2005 Jul-Aug;14(4):183-92; quiz 193-4. Review.


The value of clinical wisdom in randomised studies, real-world registries and new hypotheses.

Bernardi G, Morocutti G, Spedicato L, Zanuttini D.

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2007 May;8(5):313-7. No abstract available.


Stenting versus surgical bypass grafting for coronary artery disease: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Biondi-Zoccai GG, Abbate A, Agostoni P, Parisi Q, Turri M, Anselmi M, Vassanelli C, Zardini P, Biasucci LM.

Ital Heart J. 2003 Apr;4(4):271-80. Review.


A comparison of three-year survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Hannan EL, Racz MJ, McCallister BD, Ryan TJ, Arani DT, Isom OW, Jones RH.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Jan;33(1):63-72.


One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials.

Mercado N, Wijns W, Serruys PW, Sigwart U, Flather MD, Stables RH, O'Neill WW, Rodriguez A, Lemos PA, Hueb WA, Gersh BJ, Booth J, Boersma E.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Aug;130(2):512-9.


Coronary artery stents: a rapid systematic review and economic evaluation.

Hill R, Bagust A, Bakhai A, Dickson R, Dündar Y, Haycox A, Mujica Mota R, Reaney A, Roberts D, Williamson P, Walley T.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(35):iii-iv, 1-242. Review.


Overview of systematic reviews on invasive treatment of stable coronary artery disease.

Kuukasjärvi P, Malmivaara A, Halinen M, Hartikainen J, Keto PE, Talvensaari T, Tierala I, Mäkelä M.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Spring;22(2):219-34. Review.


[Treatment and care of coronary artery syndrome in Finland].

Vikman S, Airaksinen J, Tierala I, Peuhkurinen K, Majamaa-Voltti K, Niemelä M, Tuunanen H, Niemelä K, Nieminen MS.

Duodecim. 2005;121(7):753-9. Review. Finnish. No abstract available.


Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.

Lewsey JD, Leyland AH, Murray GD, Boddy FA.

Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(22):1-55.


Relation between coronary artery disease, baseline clinical variables, revascularization mode, and mortality. CABRI Participants. Coronary Angioplasty vs. Bypass Revascularisation Investigation.

Kurbaan AS, Rickards AF, Ilsley CD, Foale RA, Sigwart U, Bowker TJ; Coronary Angioplasty versus Bypass Revascularisation Investigation..

Am J Cardiol. 2000 Nov 1;86(9):938-42.


Systematic review: the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Bravata DM, Gienger AL, McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Perez MV, Varghese R, Kapoor JR, Ardehali R, Owens DK, Hlatky MA.

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Nov 20;147(10):703-16. Review.

Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center