Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Issues in comparisons between meta-analyses and large trials.

Ioannidis JP, Cappelleri JC, Lau J.

JAMA. 1998 Apr 8;279(14):1089-93.

PMID:
9546568
2.

Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?

Cappelleri JC, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH, de Ferranti SD, Aubert M, Chalmers TC, Lau J.

JAMA. 1996 Oct 23-30;276(16):1332-8. Review.

PMID:
8861993
3.

Indirect comparisons of competing interventions.

Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group..

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Jul;9(26):1-134, iii-iv.

4.

Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Kramer S, Green S, Forbes A.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.

PMID:
25271098
6.

Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.

Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Nov;53(11):1119-29.

PMID:
11106885
7.

Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials.

LeLorier J, Grégoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F.

N Engl J Med. 1997 Aug 21;337(8):536-42.

8.

[Meta-analysis as a tool for evaluation of evidence].

Koch A, Ziegler S.

Med Klin (Munich). 2000 Feb 15;95(2):109-16. Review. German.

PMID:
10714131
9.

Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials.

Anglemyer A, Horvath HT, Bero L.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;(4):MR000034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2. Review.

PMID:
24782322
10.

Interpretation of data from multiple trials: a critical review.

Conn HO.

J Intern Med. 1997 Mar;241(3):177-83. Review.

11.

Discrepancies among megatrials.

Furukawa TA, Streiner DL, Hori S.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Dec;53(12):1193-9.

PMID:
11146264
12.

Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology.

Jadad AR, McQuay HJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Feb;49(2):235-43. Review.

PMID:
8606325
13.

Meta-analysis: Problems with Russian Publications.

Verbitskaya EV.

Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27 Suppl 1:S89-90. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150702.

PMID:
26639728
14.

Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group.; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group..

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. Review.

15.

Meta-analyses of clinical drug trials--gold standard reviews or statistical alchemy?

Chan ES.

Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2000 Sep;29(5):610-5.

PMID:
11126696
17.

Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.

Dechartres A, Boutron I, Trinquart L, Charles P, Ravaud P.

Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 5;155(1):39-51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-1-201107050-00006.

PMID:
21727292
18.

Comparison of evidence of treatment effects in randomized and nonrandomized studies.

Ioannidis JP, Haidich AB, Pappa M, Pantazis N, Kokori SI, Tektonidou MG, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Lau J.

JAMA. 2001 Aug 15;286(7):821-30. Review.

PMID:
11497536
19.

A consumer's guide to meta-analysis.

LaValley M.

Arthritis Care Res. 1997 Jun;10(3):208-13. Review.

PMID:
9335633
20.

Application of credibility ceilings probes the robustness of meta-analyses of biomarkers and cancer risk.

Papatheodorou SI, Tsilidis KK, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;68(2):163-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Nov 26.

PMID:
25433443

Supplemental Content

Support Center