Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 250

1.

Latex condom breakage and slippage in a controlled clinical trial.

Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS.

Contraception. 1997 Jul;56(1):17-21.

PMID:
9306027
2.

Condom performance during vaginal intercourse: comparison of Trojan-Enz and Tactylon condoms.

Trussell J, Warner DL, Hatcher R.

Contraception. 1992 Jan;45(1):11-9.

PMID:
1591918
3.

Evaluation of the efficacy of a polyurethane condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Frezieres RG, Walsh TL, Nelson AL, Clark VA, Coulson AH.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Mar-Apr;31(2):81-7.

4.

Condom slippage and breakage rates.

Trussell J, Warner DL, Hatcher RA.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 Jan-Feb;24(1):20-3.

PMID:
1601122
5.

Condom breakage and slippage among men in the United States.

Grady WR, Tanfer K.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1994 May-Jun;26(3):107-12.

PMID:
8070546
6.

Breakage and acceptability of a polyurethane condom: a randomized, controlled study.

Frezieres RG, Walsh TL, Nelson AL, Clark VA, Coulson AH.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Mar-Apr;30(2):73-8.

7.

Evaluation of the efficacy of a nonlatex condom: results from a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Walsh TL, Frezieres RG, Peacock K, Nelson AL, Clark VA, Bernstein L.

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003 Mar-Apr;35(2):79-86.

PMID:
12729137
8.

Mechanical failure of the latex condom in a cohort of women at high STD risk.

Macaluso M, Kelaghan J, Artz L, Austin H, Fleenor M, Hook EW 3rd, Valappil T.

Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Sep;26(8):450-8.

PMID:
10494936
9.

Breakage and slippage of condoms in family planning clients.

Sparrow MJ, Lavill K.

Contraception. 1994 Aug;50(2):117-29.

PMID:
7956211
10.

Effectiveness of the male latex condom: combined results for three popular condom brands used as controls in randomized clinical trials.

Walsh TL, Frezieres RG, Peacock K, Nelson AL, Clark VA, Bernstein L, Wraxall BG.

Contraception. 2004 Nov;70(5):407-13.

PMID:
15504381
11.

Can condom users likely to experience condom failure be identified?

Steiner M, Piedrahita C, Glover L, Joanis C.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1993 Sep-Oct;25(5):220-3, 226.

PMID:
8262171
12.

Evaluation of a thicker condom for use as a prophylactic against HIV transmission.

Golombok S, Sheldon J.

AIDS Educ Prev. 1994 Oct;6(5):454-8.

PMID:
7818981
13.

Breakage and slippage of condoms among users in north Gondar Province, Ethiopia.

Mekonen E, Mekonen A.

East Afr Med J. 1999 Sep;76(9):481-3.

PMID:
10685314
14.

The male polyurethane condom: a review of current knowledge.

Rosenberg MJ, Waugh MS, Solomon HM, Lyszkowski AD.

Contraception. 1996 Mar;53(3):141-6. Review.

PMID:
8689877
15.

Study to determine the correlation between condom breakage in human use and laboratory test results.

Steiner M, Foldesy R, Cole D, Carter E.

Contraception. 1992 Sep;46(3):279-88.

PMID:
1451523
16.

Avanti: similar efficacy to latex, more breaks.

[No authors listed]

Contracept Technol Update. 1997 Oct;18(10):123-5.

PMID:
12321211
17.

Condom use and breakage among women in a municipal hospital family planning clinic.

Albert AE, Hatcher RA, Graves W.

Contraception. 1991 Feb;43(2):167-76.

PMID:
2040169
18.

The real problem with male condoms is nonuse.

Steiner MJ, Cates W Jr, Warner L.

Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Sep;26(8):459-62.

PMID:
10494937
19.

Assessing condom use practices. Implications for evaluating method and user effectiveness.

Warner L, Clay-Warner J, Boles J, Williamson J.

Sex Transm Dis. 1998 Jul;25(6):273-7.

PMID:
9662759
20.

Comparative evaluation of three Tactylon(TM) condoms and a latex condom during vaginal intercourse: breakage and slippage.

Callahan M, Mauck C, Taylor D, Frezieres R, Walsh T, Martens M.

Contraception. 2000 Mar;61(3):205-15.

PMID:
10827335

Supplemental Content

Support Center