Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 129

1.

Diagnostic discrepancies and their clinical impact in a neuropathology referral practice.

Bruner JM, Inouye L, Fuller GN, Langford LA.

Cancer. 1997 Feb 15;79(4):796-803.

PMID:
9024718
2.

Impact of second opinion pathology in the definitive management of patients with bladder carcinoma.

Coblentz TR, Mills SE, Theodorescu D.

Cancer. 2001 Apr 1;91(7):1284-90.

PMID:
11283928
3.

Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.

Manion E, Cohen MB, Weydert J.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 May;32(5):732-7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31815a04f5. Erratum in: Am J Surg Pathol. 2008 Dec;32(12):1919-22.

PMID:
18360282
4.

Second opinion pathology in liver biopsy interpretation.

Bejarano PA, Koehler A, Sherman KE.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Nov;96(11):3158-64.

PMID:
11721765
5.

Quality assurance of second opinion pathology in gynecologic oncology.

Selman AE, Niemann TH, Fowler JM, Copeland LJ.

Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Aug;94(2):302-6.

PMID:
10432147
6.

Pathologic diagnosis as the gold standard.

Rorke LB.

Cancer. 1997 Feb 15;79(4):665-7.

PMID:
9024702
7.

Patterns of second-opinion diagnosis in oral and maxillofacial pathology.

Jones K, Jordan RC.

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jun;109(6):865-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.12.023. Epub 2010 Mar 20.

PMID:
20304686
8.

Discrepancies in diagnoses of neuroepithelial neoplasms: the San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study.

Aldape K, Simmons ML, Davis RL, Miike R, Wiencke J, Barger G, Lee M, Chen P, Wrensch M.

Cancer. 2000 May 15;88(10):2342-9.

PMID:
10820357
9.

Institutional pathology consultation.

Tsung JS.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2004 Mar;28(3):399-402.

PMID:
15104305
10.

Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital.

Kronz JD, Westra WH, Epstein JI.

Cancer. 1999 Dec 1;86(11):2426-35.

PMID:
10590387
11.

Comparison of first-opinion and second-opinion histopathology from dogs and cats with cancer: 430 cases (2001-2008).

Regan RC, Rassnick KM, Balkman CE, Bailey DB, McDonough SP.

Vet Comp Oncol. 2010 Mar;8(1):1-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2009.00203.x.

PMID:
20230576
12.

Discrepancies in dermatopathology diagnoses: the role of second review policies and dermatopathology fellowship training.

Gaudi S, Zarandona JM, Raab SS, English JC 3rd, Jukic DM.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013 Jan;68(1):119-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.06.034. Epub 2012 Aug 11.

PMID:
22892284
13.

[Impact of pathological review by an expert on the diagnosis and management of patients with cancer in Aquitania].

Lapeyrere N, Parrens M, Coindre JM, Soubeyran I, de Mascarel A, Merlio JP, Lebail B, Lepreux S, Jaffre A, Gilleron V, Mathoulin-PĂ©lissier S, Vergier B; le Groupe des anatomopathologistes Aquitains.

Ann Pathol. 2008 Dec;28(6):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.annpat.2008.09.044. Epub 2008 Nov 17. French.

PMID:
19084716
15.

Institutional review of outside cytology materials: a retrospective analysis of two institutions' experiences.

Layfield LJ, Jones C, Rowe L, Gopez EV.

Diagn Cytopathol. 2002 Jan;26(1):45-8.

PMID:
11782087
17.

The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care.

Abt AB, Abt LG, Olt GJ.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995 Jun;119(6):514-7.

PMID:
7605166
18.

Pathology slide review in gynecologic oncology: routine or selective?

Chan YM, Cheung AN, Cheng DK, Ng TY, Ngan HY, Wong LC.

Gynecol Oncol. 1999 Nov;75(2):267-71.

PMID:
10525384
19.

Should pathologists send all or only selected slides for patient-requested interlaboratory second opinion?

Renshaw MA, Renshaw AA, Gould EW.

Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Nov;132(5):763-6. doi: 10.1309/AJCP55VZZLQEHPPS.

PMID:
19846819

Supplemental Content

Support Center