Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 239

1.
2.

Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography.

Hua P, Woo EJ, Webster JG, Tompkins WJ.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993 Apr;40(4):335-43.

PMID:
8375870
3.

Electrical impedance tomography problem with inaccurately known boundary and contact impedances.

Kolehmainen V, Lassas M, Ola P.

IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Oct;27(10):1404-14. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2008.920600.

PMID:
18815092
4.

Using compound electrodes in electrical impedance tomography.

Hua P, Woo EJ, Webster JG, Tompkins WJ.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993 Jan;40(1):29-34.

PMID:
8468073
5.
6.

Numerical modelling errors in electrical impedance tomography.

Dehghani H, Soleimani M.

Physiol Meas. 2007 Jul;28(7):S45-55. Epub 2007 Jun 26.

PMID:
17664647
7.

Assessment of errors in static electrical impedance tomography with adjacent and trigonometric current patterns.

Kolehmainen V, Vauhkonen M, Karjalainen PA, Kaipio JP.

Physiol Meas. 1997 Nov;18(4):289-303.

PMID:
9413863
8.

Current approaches to analogue instrumentation design in electrical impedance tomography.

Boone KG, Holder DS.

Physiol Meas. 1996 Nov;17(4):229-47. Review.

PMID:
8953622
9.

Electrical impedance tomography of complex conductivity distributions with noncircular boundary.

Jain H, Isaacson D, Edic PM, Newell JC.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997 Nov;44(11):1051-60.

PMID:
9353984
10.

Accounting for hardware imperfections in EIT image reconstruction algorithms.

Hartinger AE, Gagnon H, Guardo R.

Physiol Meas. 2007 Jul;28(7):S13-27. Epub 2007 Jun 26.

PMID:
17664631
11.

The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images.

Boyle A, Adler A.

Physiol Meas. 2011 Jul;32(7):745-54. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/32/7/S02. Epub 2011 Jun 7.

PMID:
21646710
12.

Transthoracic impedance study with large self-adhesive electrodes in two conventional positions for defibrillation.

Krasteva V, Matveev M, Mudrov N, Prokopova R.

Physiol Meas. 2006 Oct;27(10):1009-22. Epub 2006 Aug 25.

PMID:
16951460
13.

Induced current electrical impedance tomography system: experimental results and numerical simulations.

Zlochiver S, Radai MM, Abboud S, Rosenfeld M, Dong XZ, Liu RG, You FS, Xiang HY, Shi XT.

Physiol Meas. 2004 Feb;25(1):239-55.

PMID:
15005319
14.

An improved data acquisition method for electrical impedance tomography.

Kerner TE, Harto A, Osterman KS, DeLorenzo C, Paulsen KD.

Physiol Meas. 2001 Feb;22(1):31-8.

PMID:
11236887
15.

Extraction of electrical characteristics from pixels of multifrequency EIT images.

Fitzgerald AJ, Thomas BJ, Cornish BH, Michael GJ, Ward LC.

Physiol Meas. 1997 May;18(2):107-18.

PMID:
9183805
16.

Electrical impedance tomography with compensation for electrode positioning variations.

Blott BH, Daniell GJ, Meeson S.

Phys Med Biol. 1998 Jun;43(6):1731-9.

PMID:
9651036
17.

A comparison study of electrodes for neonate electrical impedance tomography.

Rahal M, Khor JM, Demosthenous A, Tizzard A, Bayford R.

Physiol Meas. 2009 Jun;30(6):S73-84. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/30/6/S05. Epub 2009 Jun 2.

PMID:
19491443
18.

Newly explored electrical properties of normal skin and special skin sites.

Mayer-Gindner A, Lek-Uthai A, Abdallah O, Bolz A.

Biomed Tech (Berl). 2004 May;49(5):117-24.

PMID:
15212196
19.

Tissue spectroscopy with electrical impedance tomography: computer simulations.

Griffiths H.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1995 Sep;42(9):948-54.

PMID:
7558071
20.

Common-mode feedback in electrical impedance tomography.

Rosell J, Riu P.

Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1992;13 Suppl A:11-4.

PMID:
1587082

Supplemental Content

Support Center