Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 370

1.

Likelihood ratios for modern screening mammography. Risk of breast cancer based on age and mammographic interpretation.

Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V.

JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):39-43.

PMID:
8667537
2.

Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography.

Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V.

JAMA. 1996 Jul 3;276(1):33-8.

PMID:
8667536
3.

Comparison of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer.

Kerlikowske K, Barclay J, Grady D, Sickles EA, Ernster V.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Jan 1;89(1):76-82.

4.

Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.

Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V.

JAMA. 1993 Nov 24;270(20):2444-50.

PMID:
8230621
5.

Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer.

Kerlikowske K, Carney PA, Geller B, Mandelson MT, Taplin SH, Malvin K, Ernster V, Urban N, Cutter G, Rosenberg R, Ballard-Barbash R.

Ann Intern Med. 2000 Dec 5;133(11):855-63.

PMID:
11103055
6.
8.
9.

Differences in screening mammography outcomes among White, Chinese, and Filipino women.

Kerlikowske K, Creasman J, Leung JW, Smith-Bindman R, Ernster VL.

Arch Intern Med. 2005 Sep 12;165(16):1862-8.

PMID:
16157830
10.

Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population.

Tice JA, Cummings SR, Ziv E, Kerlikowske K.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005 Nov;94(2):115-22.

PMID:
16261410
11.

Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.

Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Frankel SD, Ominsky SH, Sickles EA, Ernster V.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Dec 2;90(23):1801-9.

12.

Positive predictive value of specific mammographic findings according to reader and patient variables.

Venkatesan A, Chu P, Kerlikowske K, Sickles EA, Smith-Bindman R.

Radiology. 2009 Mar;250(3):648-57. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2503080541.

13.

Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography.

Laya MB, Larson EB, Taplin SH, White E.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 May 15;88(10):643-9.

14.

Responding to the challenges of breast cancer in egypt and other arab countries.

El Saghir NS.

J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2008 Dec;20(4):309-12.

15.

Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.

Kerlikowske K, Smith-Bindman R, Abraham LA, Lehman CD, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Voeks JH, Geller BM, Carney PA, Sickles EA.

Radiology. 2005 Mar;234(3):684-92.

PMID:
15734926
16.

Outcomes of modern screening mammography.

Kerlikowske K, Barclay J.

J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):105-11. Review.

PMID:
9709285
17.

Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.

Kerlikowske K, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Vacek PM, Smith-Bindman R, Yankaskas B, Carney PA, Ballard-Barbash R; National Institutes of Health Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium..

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Mar 7;99(5):386-95.

18.
19.

Factors associated with imaging and procedural events used to detect breast cancer after screening mammography.

Carney PA, Abraham LA, Miglioretti DL, Yabroff KR, Sickles EA, Buist DS, Kasales CJ, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Dignan MB, Weaver DL, Kerlikowske K; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium..

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):385-92.

PMID:
17242246
20.

Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.

Morimoto T, Sasa M, Yamaguchi T, Kondo H, Akaiwa H, Sagara Y.

Anticancer Res. 2000 Sep-Oct;20(5C):3689-94.

PMID:
11268440
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center