Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 110

1.

Ultrasonically determined elasticity and cortical density in canine femora after hip arthroplasty.

Kohles SS, Vanderby R Jr, Ashman RB, Manley PA, Markel MD, Heiner JP.

J Biomech. 1994 Feb;27(2):137-44.

PMID:
8132681
2.
3.

Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses.

Engh CA, O'Connor D, Jasty M, McGovern TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Dec;(285):13-29.

PMID:
1446429
4.

Effect of flexibility of the femoral stem on bone-remodeling and fixation of the stem in a canine total hip arthroplasty model without cement.

Harvey EJ, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M, Stackpool GJ, Krygier JJ, Hacking SA.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jan;81(1):93-107.

PMID:
9973059
6.

Producing and avoiding stress shielding. Laboratory and clinical observations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, Engh CA, Miller JE, Brooks CE.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jan;(274):79-96.

PMID:
1729025
7.

ESB Research Award 1992. The mechanism of bone remodeling and resorption around press-fitted THA stems.

Van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R, Weinans H, Sumner DR, Turner TM, Galante JO.

J Biomech. 1993 Apr-May;26(4-5):369-82.

PMID:
8478342
8.

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry of implanted femora after cemented and press-fit total hip arthroplasty in a canine model.

Markel MD, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Bogdanske JJ, Wahner HW, Chao EY.

J Orthop Res. 1993 May;11(3):452-6.

PMID:
8326453
9.

A Madreporic-surfaced femoral component in a canine total hip arthroplasty model: bone remodelling response at 6 and 24 months.

Finkelstein JA, Anderson GI, Waddell JP, Richards RR, Humeniuk B.

Can J Surg. 1995 Dec;38(6):501-6.

PMID:
7497364
10.

The effect of stem stiffness on femoral bone resorption after canine porous-coated total hip arthroplasty.

Bobyn JD, Glassman AH, Goto H, Krygier JJ, Miller JE, Brooks CE.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990 Dec;(261):196-213.

PMID:
2245546
11.

The effect of hip stem material modulus on surface strain in human femora.

Vail TP, Glisson RR, Koukoubis TD, Guilak F.

J Biomech. 1998 Jul;31(7):619-28.

PMID:
9796684
12.

Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.

Bolognesi MP, Pietrobon R, Clifford PE, Vail TP.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Dec;86-A(12):2720-5.

PMID:
15590859
13.

Biomechanical evaluation of screw-in femoral implant in cementless total hip system.

Kim JY, Hayashi K, Garcia TC, Kim SY, Entwistle R, Kapatkin AS, Stover SM.

Vet Surg. 2012 Jan;41(1):94-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00890.x. Epub 2011 Sep 28.

PMID:
22092256
14.

Use of an Electron Beam Melting Manufactured Titanium Collared Cementless Femoral Stem to Resist Subsidence After Canine Total Hip Replacement.

Liska WD, Doyle ND.

Vet Surg. 2015 Oct;44(7):883-94. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12353. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

PMID:
26138323
15.

Correlation of computed finite element stresses to bone density after remodeling around cementless femoral implants.

Skinner HB, Kilgus DJ, Keyak J, Shimaoka EE, Kim AS, Tipton JS.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Aug;(305):178-89.

PMID:
8050227
16.
17.

The effect of the medial collar in total hip arthroplasty with porous-coated components inserted without cement. An in vivo canine study.

Cheng SL, Davey JR, Inman RD, Binnington AG, Smith TJ.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jan;77(1):118-23.

PMID:
7822343
18.
19.

The influence of design parameters on calcar stresses following femoral head arthroplasty.

Cook SD, Klawitter JJ, Weinstein AM.

J Biomed Mater Res. 1980 Mar;14(2):133-44.

PMID:
7358741
20.

Mechanical properties of femoral trabecular bone in dogs.

Pressel T, Bouguecha A, Vogt U, Meyer-Lindenberg A, Behrens BA, Nolte I, Windhagen H.

Biomed Eng Online. 2005 Mar 17;4:17.

Supplemental Content

Support Center