Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 171

1.

Re: "A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods".

Olkin I.

Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Aug 1;140(3):297-9; discussion 300-1. No abstract available.

PMID:
8048979
2.

Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods.

Greenland S.

Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Aug 1;140(3):290-6.

PMID:
8030632
3.

Re: "Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods".

Vandenbroucke JP.

Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Nov 1;142(9):1007-9. No abstract available.

PMID:
7572968
4.
5.

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.

Ioannidis JP.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x. Review.

PMID:
19018930
6.

Statistical and theoretical considerations in meta-analysis.

Olkin I.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):133-46; discussion 147. Review.

PMID:
7853039
7.

Meta-analytic methods for diagnostic test accuracy.

Irwig L, Macaskill P, Glasziou P, Fahey M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jan;48(1):119-30; discussion 131-2. Review.

PMID:
7853038
8.

Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.

Sterne JA, J√ľni P, Schulz KF, Altman DG, Bartlett C, Egger M.

Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1513-24.

PMID:
12111917
9.

Bias in meta-analytic research.

Felson DT.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Aug;45(8):885-92.

PMID:
1624971
10.

What have we learned from meta-analysis?

Stockler M, Coates A.

Med J Aust. 1993 Sep 6;159(5):291-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
8361419
11.

The meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies.

Boissel J, Cucherat M.

Eur Radiol. 1998;8(3):484-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
9510593
12.

Modelling study quality in meta-analysis.

Tritchler D.

Stat Med. 1999 Aug 30;18(16):2135-45.

PMID:
10441769
13.

Meta-analysis: reconciling the results of independent studies.

Olkin I.

Stat Med. 1995 Mar 15-Apr 15;14(5-7):457-72. No abstract available.

PMID:
7792440
14.

Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.

Keus F, Wetterslev J, Gluud C, Gooszen HG, van Laarhoven CJ.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):546-51. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.22.

PMID:
19262513
15.

Statistical analysis of complex health and social data.

Kreiner S.

Soc Sci Med. 1989;29(2):253-8. Review.

PMID:
2665111
16.
17.

Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.

Peters JL, Mengersen KL.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):941-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01010.x. Review.

PMID:
19018929
18.

Effect of formal statistical significance on the credibility of observational associations.

Ioannidis JP.

Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Aug 15;168(4):374-83; discussion 384-90. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn156. Review.

PMID:
18611956
19.

Selective reporting of adjusted estimates in observational epidemiology studies: reasons and implications for meta-analyses.

Peters J, Mengersen K.

Eval Health Prof. 2008 Dec;31(4):370-89. doi: 10.1177/0163278708324438. Review.

PMID:
19000980
20.

Meta-analysis: an update.

Sacks HS, Reitman D, Pagano D, Kupelnick B.

Mt Sinai J Med. 1996 May-Sep;63(3-4):216-24. Review.

PMID:
8692168

Supplemental Content

Support Center