Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 98

1.

The use of family health services authority registers as a sampling frame in the UK: a review of theory and practice.

Roberts HR, Rushton L, Muir KR, Dengler R, Coupland CA, Jenkinson CM, Ruffell A, Chilvers CE.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49(4):344-7. No abstract available.

2.

Population estimates from patient registers held by British family health services authorities.

Haynes RM, Lovett AA, Bentham G, Brainard JS, Gale SH.

J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Aug;49(4):440. No abstract available.

3.

Survey of UK computerised special needs registers.

Hutchison T, Harpin V.

Arch Dis Child. 1998 Apr;78(4):312-5.

4.

Screening: completeness of population registers a problem for some sub-groups.

Lowry RJ, Harvey J.

J Public Health Med. 1999 Sep;21(3):360-1. No abstract available.

5.

Computerised age/sex registers.

Kljakovic M, Moodie PJ.

N Z Med J. 1993 May 12;106(955):186-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
8502450
6.

Use of registers and population censuses as sampling frames in Great Britain.

Barnes R.

Stat J UN Econ Comm Eur. 1986 May;4(1):81-92.

PMID:
12268279
7.
8.

Randomized trials in perinatology: major achievements and future potential.

Grant A.

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:107-17; discussion 117-8. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
8192288
9.

Quantitative and qualitative verification of data quality in the childbirth registers of two rural district hospitals in Western Kenya.

Chiba Y, Oguttu MA, Nakayama T.

Midwifery. 2012 Jun;28(3):329-39. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.05.005.

PMID:
21684639
10.

Pediatric CT--the challenge of dose records.

Applegate KE, Thomas K.

Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Sep;41 Suppl 2:523-7. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2161-9. Review.

PMID:
21847734
11.

Huge Biobank project launches despite critics.

Giles J.

Nature. 2006 Mar 16;440(7082):263. No abstract available.

PMID:
16541039
12.

The distribution of medical X-ray doses amongst individuals in the British population.

Hart D, Le Heron JC.

Br J Radiol. 1992 Nov;65(779):996-1002.

PMID:
1450838
13.

UKCCCR Register of U.K. Cancer Trials.

Fayers P, Gibson D, Mossman J.

Control Clin Trials. 1995 Jun;16(3):172-81.

PMID:
7796599
14.
15.

The Italian Network of Cancer Registries (AIRT).

Guzzinati S, Spitale A.

Epidemiol Prev. 2004 Mar-Apr;28(2 Suppl):7-11. English, Italian.

16.

Child health records as a database for clinical practice, research and community planning.

Hagelin E, Lagerberg D, Sundelin C.

J Adv Nurs. 1991 Jan;16(1):15-23.

PMID:
2005285
17.

Cancer information under threat: the case for legislation.

Brewster DH, Coleman MP, Forman D, Roche M.

Ann Oncol. 2001 Feb;12(2):145-7. No abstract available.

18.

Computerized health information in The Netherlands: a registration network of family practices.

Metsemakers JF, Höppener P, Knottnerus JA, Kocken RJ, Limonard CB.

Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Mar;42(356):102-6.

19.

Clinical research databases--a historical review.

Collen MF.

J Med Syst. 1990 Dec;14(6):323-44. Review.

PMID:
2132040
20.

Alternative population sampling frames produced important differences in estimates of association: a case-control study of vasculitis.

Macfarlane GJ, Jones GT, Swafe L, Reid DM, Basu N.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;66(6):675-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.009.

PMID:
23313107
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center