Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 79

1.

Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model.

Eriksen CW, St James JD.

Percept Psychophys. 1986 Oct;40(4):225-40. No abstract available.

PMID:
3786090
2.

A physiological correlate of the "Zoom Lens" of visual attention.

Müller NG, Bartelt OA, Donner TH, Villringer A, Brandt SA.

J Neurosci. 2003 May 1;23(9):3561-5.

3.
4.

New evidence for the zoom lens model using the RSVP technique.

Barriopedro MI, Botella J.

Percept Psychophys. 1998 Nov;60(8):1406-14.

PMID:
9865080
5.

An element in the visual field is just a conjunction of attributes: a critique of Bundesen (1991)

van der Velde F, van der Heijden AH.

Percept Psychophys. 1993 Mar;53(3):345-9; discussion 350-2.

PMID:
8483698
6.

Visual processing capacity and attentional control.

Shiffrin RM, Gardner GT.

J Exp Psychol. 1972 Apr;93(1):72-82. No abstract available.

PMID:
5013342
7.

Perception of signals presented in the periphery of the visual field.

Houtmans MJ, Sanders AF.

Acta Psychol (Amst). 1984 Mar;55(2):143-55. No abstract available.

PMID:
6731002
8.

Invariant visual responses from attentional gain fields.

Salinas E, Abbott LF.

J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jun;77(6):3267-72.

9.

The "zoom lens" of focal attention in visual search: changes in aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Rösler A, Mapstone M, Hays-Wicklund A, Gitelman DR, Weintraub S.

Cortex. 2005 Aug;41(4):512-9.

PMID:
16042027
10.

Directing attention in the visual field.

Duncan J.

Percept Psychophys. 1981 Jul;30(1):90-3. No abstract available.

PMID:
7290900
11.

Hemispheric asymmetry: verbal and spatial encoding of visual stimuli.

Geffen G, Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC.

J Exp Psychol. 1972 Sep;95(1):25-31. No abstract available.

PMID:
5070292
12.

What determines sustained visual attention? The impact of distracter positions, task difficulty and visual fields compared.

Kraft A, Pape N, Hagendorf H, Schmidt S, Naito A, Brandt SA.

Brain Res. 2007 Feb 16;1133(1):123-35. Epub 2006 Dec 15.

PMID:
17174284
13.

Multiple parallel access in visual attention.

Pylyshyn Z, Burkell J, Fisher B, Sears C, Schmidt W, Trick L.

Can J Exp Psychol. 1994 Jun;48(2):260-83.

PMID:
8069285
14.

Relation between similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability.

Beck J.

J Exp Psychol. 1974 Jun;102(6):1145-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
4841326
15.
16.

Similarity grouping and peripheral discriminability under uncertainty.

Beck J.

Am J Psychol. 1972 Mar;85(1):1-19. No abstract available.

PMID:
5019427
17.

Attentional bias and visual field asymmetry.

Beaumont JG, Colley M.

Cortex. 1980 Oct;16(3):391-6.

PMID:
7214924
18.

Visual form perception: tachistoscopic experiment.

Welman AJ, van der Maaten HJ.

Psychiatr Neurol Neurochir. 1972 Sep-Oct;75(5):351-7. No abstract available.

PMID:
4644037
19.

The visual response of the human newborn to linear contour.

Kessen W, Salapatek P, Haith M.

J Exp Child Psychol. 1972 Feb;13(1):9-20. No abstract available.

PMID:
5059962
20.

Directed attention and maladaptive "adaptation" to displacement of the visual field.

Canon LK.

J Exp Psychol. 1971 Jun;88(3):403-8. No abstract available.

PMID:
5090930

Supplemental Content

Support Center