Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Viscoelastic characterization of injured brain tissue after controlled cortical impact (CCI) using a mouse model.

Qiu S, Jiang W, Alam MS, Chen S, Lai C, Wang T, Li X, Liu J, Gao M, Tang Y, Li X, Zeng J, Feng Y.

J Neurosci Methods. 2019 Nov 4;330:108463. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108463. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31698000
2.

A longitudinal study of the mechanical properties of injured brain tissue in a mouse model.

Feng Y, Gao Y, Wang T, Tao L, Qiu S, Zhao X.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Jul;71:407-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

PMID:
28412646
3.

A viscoelastic analysis of the P56 mouse brain under large-deformation dynamic indentation.

MacManus DB, Pierrat B, Murphy JG, Gilchrist MD.

Acta Biomater. 2017 Jan 15;48:309-318. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.029. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

PMID:
27777117
4.

Characterizing viscoelastic mechanical properties of highly compliant polymers and biological tissues using impact indentation.

Mijailovic AS, Qing B, Fortunato D, Van Vliet KJ.

Acta Biomater. 2018 Apr 15;71:388-397. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.02.017. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

PMID:
29477455
5.

Regional mechanical properties of human brain tissue for computational models of traumatic brain injury.

Finan JD, Sundaresh SN, Elkin BS, McKhann GM 2nd, Morrison B 3rd.

Acta Biomater. 2017 Jun;55:333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.03.037. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

PMID:
28351681
6.

Long-term in vivo imaging of viscoelastic properties of the mouse brain after controlled cortical impact.

Boulet T, Kelso ML, Othman SF.

J Neurotrauma. 2013 Sep 1;30(17):1512-20. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2788. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

7.

Why is CA3 more vulnerable than CA1 in experimental models of controlled cortical impact-induced brain injury?

Mao H, Elkin BS, Genthikatti VV, Morrison B 3rd, Yang KH.

J Neurotrauma. 2013 Sep 1;30(17):1521-30. doi: 10.1089/neu.2012.2520. Epub 2013 Aug 3.

8.

Measurement of viscoelastic properties in multiple anatomical regions of acute rat brain tissue slices.

Lee SJ, King MA, Sun J, Xie HK, Subhash G, Sarntinoranont M.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan;29:213-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.026. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

PMID:
24099950
9.

The Controlled Cortical Impact Model: Applications, Considerations for Researchers, and Future Directions.

Osier ND, Dixon CE.

Front Neurol. 2016 Aug 17;7:134. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00134. eCollection 2016. Review.

10.

Controlled Cortical Impact Model.

Osier ND, Korpon JR, Dixon CE.

In: Kobeissy FH, editor. Brain Neurotrauma: Molecular, Neuropsychological, and Rehabilitation Aspects. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2015. Chapter 16.

11.

Changes to the viscoelastic properties of brain tissue after traumatic axonal injury.

Shafieian M, Darvish KK, Stone JR.

J Biomech. 2009 Sep 18;42(13):2136-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.041. Epub 2009 Aug 20.

PMID:
19698945
12.

Shear elastic modulus estimation from indentation and SDUV on gelatin phantoms.

Amador C, Urban MW, Chen S, Chen Q, An KN, Greenleaf JF.

IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Jun;58(6):1706-14. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2111419. Epub 2011 Feb 10.

13.

Imaging and serum biomarkers reflecting the functional efficacy of extended erythropoietin treatment in rats following infantile traumatic brain injury.

Robinson S, Winer JL, Berkner J, Chan LA, Denson JL, Maxwell JR, Yang Y, Sillerud LO, Tasker RC, Meehan WP 3rd, Mannix R, Jantzie LL.

J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Jun;17(6):739-55. doi: 10.3171/2015.10.PEDS15554. Epub 2016 Feb 19.

14.

Characterizing viscoelastic properties of breast cancer tissue in a mouse model using indentation.

Qiu S, Zhao X, Chen J, Zeng J, Chen S, Chen L, Meng Y, Liu B, Shan H, Gao M, Feng Y.

J Biomech. 2018 Mar 1;69:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.007. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

PMID:
29361276
15.

Administration of S-nitrosoglutathione after traumatic brain injury protects the neurovascular unit and reduces secondary injury in a rat model of controlled cortical impact.

Khan M, Im YB, Shunmugavel A, Gilg AG, Dhindsa RK, Singh AK, Singh I.

J Neuroinflammation. 2009 Nov 4;6:32. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-6-32.

16.

Mechanical characterisation of brain tissue up to 35% strain at 1, 10, and 100/s using a custom-built micro-indentation apparatus.

MacManus DB, Murphy JG, Gilchrist MD.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Nov;87:256-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.025. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

PMID:
30096513
17.

Cerebral blood flow at one year after controlled cortical impact in rats: assessment by magnetic resonance imaging.

Kochanek PM, Hendrich KS, Dixon CE, Schiding JK, Williams DS, Ho C.

J Neurotrauma. 2002 Sep;19(9):1029-37.

PMID:
12482116
18.

A detailed viscoelastic characterization of the P17 and adult rat brain.

Elkin BS, Ilankovan AI, Morrison B 3rd.

J Neurotrauma. 2011 Nov;28(11):2235-44. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1604. Epub 2011 May 25.

PMID:
21341982
19.

Brain Region-Specific Histopathological Effects of Varying Trajectories of Controlled Cortical Impact Injury Model of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Pabón MM, Acosta S, Guedes VA, Tajiri N, Kaneko Y, Borlongan CV.

CNS Neurosci Ther. 2016 Mar;22(3):200-11. doi: 10.1111/cns.12485. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

20.

A modified controlled cortical impact technique to model mild traumatic brain injury mechanics in mice.

Chen Y, Mao H, Yang KH, Abel T, Meaney DF.

Front Neurol. 2014 Jun 18;5:100. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00100. eCollection 2014.

Supplemental Content

Support Center