Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.
2.

The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.

Fabiani A, Principi E, Filosa A, Servi L.

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017 Oct 3;89(3):245-246. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2017.3.245.

3.

A retrospective comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.

Di Franco CA, Jallous H, Porru D, Giliberto GL, Cebrelli T, Tinelli C, Rovereto B.

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2017 Mar 31;89(1):55-59. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2017.1.55.

4.

The results of transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shen PF, Zhu YC, Wei WR, Li YZ, Yang J, Li YT, Li DM, Wang J, Zeng H.

Asian J Androl. 2012 Mar;14(2):310-5. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.130. Epub 2011 Nov 21. Review.

5.

Comparison between transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy for detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Xue J, Qin Z, Cai H, Zhang C, Li X, Xu W, Wang J, Xu Z, Yu B, Xu T, Zou Q.

Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 4;8(14):23322-23336. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15056.

6.

Direct comparison between transrectal and transperineal extended prostate biopsy for the detection of cancer.

Kawakami S, Yamamoto S, Numao N, Ishikawa Y, Kihara K, Fukui I.

Int J Urol. 2007 Aug;14(8):719-24.

7.

Transrectal versus transperineal 14-core prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a comparative evaluation at the same institution.

Cerruto MA, Vianello F, D'Elia C, Artibani W, Novella G.

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014 Dec 30;86(4):284-7. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2014.4.284.

8.

Comparison Between a Combined Transrectal and Transperineal Approach and a Transrectal Approach for Prostate Rebiopsy.

Shida Y, Hakariya T, Takehara K, Onita T, Miyata Y, Sakai H.

Anticancer Res. 2016 Sep;36(9):4685-90.

PMID:
27630313
9.
10.

Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Pepe P, Garufi A, Priolo G, Pennisi M.

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Feb;15(1):e33-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

PMID:
27530436
11.

Feasibility of freehand MRI/US cognitive fusion transperineal biopsy of the prostate in local anaesthesia as in-office procedure-experience with 400 patients.

Wetterauer C, Shahin O, Federer-Gsponer JR, Keller N, Wyler S, Seifert HH, Kwiatkowski M.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jan 2. doi: 10.1038/s41391-019-0201-y. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31896767
12.

A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.

Ber Y, Segal N, Tamir S, Benjaminov O, Yakimov M, Sela S, Halstauch D, Baniel J, Kedar D, Margel D.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jan 17. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0205-7. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31953483
13.

A Retrospective Comparison of Transrectal and Transperineal Prostate Biopsies: Experience of a Single Surgeon.

Young R, Norris B, Reeves F, Peters JS.

J Endourol. 2019 Jun;33(6):498-502. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0170.

PMID:
30990058
14.

Extensive biopsy using a combined transperineal and transrectal approach to improve prostate cancer detection.

Watanabe M, Hayashi T, Tsushima T, Irie S, Kaneshige T, Kumon H.

Int J Urol. 2005 Nov;12(11):959-63.

15.

Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Local Anesthesia: Experience with 1,287 Patients. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate, Complications and Patient Tolerability.

Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, Spevack L, Hajek D, Tunis A, Lai E, Loblaw A; Collaborators.

J Urol. 2019 Jun;201(6):1121-1126. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000156.

PMID:
30835607
16.

Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Tu X, Liu Z, Chang T, Qiu S, Xu H, Bao Y, Yang L, Wei Q.

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):e860-e870. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 21. Review.

PMID:
31281065
17.

[Questionnaire based evaluation of prostate biopsy complication comparing different bioptic schemes].

Damiano R, Oliva A, Cantiello F, Esposito C, PerdonĂ  S, De Sio M, Bitonti M, Sacco R, D'Armiento M.

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2003 Mar;75(1):40-5. Italian.

PMID:
12741345
18.

Transperineal prostate biopsy detects significant cancer in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous negative transrectal biopsies.

Dimmen M, Vlatkovic L, Hole KH, Nesland JM, Brennhovd B, Axcrona K.

BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2 Pt 2):E69-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10759.x. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

19.

Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy for predicting the final laterality of prostate cancer: are they reliable enough to select patients for focal therapy? Results from a multicenter international study.

Miano R, De Nunzio C, Kim FJ, Rocco B, Gontero P, Vicentini C, Micali S, Oderda M, Masciovecchio S, Asimakopoulos AD.

Int Braz J Urol. 2014 Jan-Feb;40(1):16-22. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.01.03.

20.

Optimal approach for prostate cancer detection as initial biopsy: prospective randomized study comparing transperineal versus transrectal systematic 12-core biopsy.

Hara R, Jo Y, Fujii T, Kondo N, Yokoyoma T, Miyaji Y, Nagai A.

Urology. 2008 Feb;71(2):191-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.029.

PMID:
18308081

Supplemental Content

Support Center