Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

The value of transperineal apical prostate biopsy in predicting urethral/apical margin status after radical prostatectomy.

Dai J, Zhang X, Zhao J, Sun G, Chen J, Liu J, Tao R, Zeng H, Shen P.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Oct;98(43):e17633. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017633.

2.

Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

3.

Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.

Chalfin HJ, Dinizo M, Trock BJ, Feng Z, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Humphreys E, Han M.

BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1684-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11371.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

4.

Predictors of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy at a single institution: preoperative and pathologic factors, and the impact of surgeon variability and technique on incidence and location.

Lallas CD, Fashola Y, Den RB, Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F, Calvaresi AE, McCue P, Birbe R, Gomella LG, Trabulsi EJ.

Can J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(5):7479-86.

PMID:
25347375
5.

Perineural invasion status, Gleason score and number of positive cores in biopsy pathology are predictors of positive surgical margin following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Yang R, Cao K, Han T, Zhang YF, Zhang GT, Xu LF, Lian HB, Li XG, Guo HQ.

Asian J Androl. 2017 Jul-Aug;19(4):468-472. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.173444.

6.

Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics.

Tsivian M, Zilberman DE, Ferrandino MN, Madden JF, Mouraviev V, Albala DM.

J Endourol. 2012 Apr;26(4):361-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0336. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

PMID:
22192106
7.

Impact of Variations in Prostatic Apex Shape on Apical Margin Positive Rate After Radical Prostatectomy: Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy vs Open Radical Prostatectomy.

Yu YD, Lee M, Hong SK, Byun SS, Lee SE, Lee S.

J Endourol. 2018 Jan;32(1):46-53. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0693. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

PMID:
29212368
8.

Predictors of adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer.

Park JW, Koh DH, Jang WS, Cho KS, Ham WS, Rha KH, Hong SJ, Choi YD.

BMC Cancer. 2018 May 9;18(1):545. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4416-4.

9.

Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.

Gallina A, Maccagnano C, Suardi N, Capitanio U, Abdollah F, Raber M, Salonia A, Scattoni V, Rigatti P, Montorsi F, Briganti A.

BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10762.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

10.

Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Tuliao PH, Koo KC, Komninos C, Chang CH, Choi YD, Chung BH, Hong SJ, Rha KH.

BJU Int. 2015 Dec;116(6):897-904. doi: 10.1111/bju.12888. Epub 2015 Jun 2.

11.

Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence.

Jo JK, Hong SK, Byun SS, Zargar H, Autorino R, Lee SE.

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Oct;69(5):493-500. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02707-2. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

12.

Percentage of cancer on biopsy cores accurately predicts extracapsular extension and biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy for T1-T2 prostate cancer.

Ravery V, Chastang C, Toublanc M, Boccon-Gibod L, Delmas V, Boccon-Gibod L.

Eur Urol. 2000 Apr;37(4):449-55.

PMID:
10765076
13.

Role of intraoperative biopsies during radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Lepor H, Kaci L.

Urology. 2004 Mar;63(3):499-502.

PMID:
15028445
14.

The impact of prior TURP on radical prostatectomy surgical margins: a multicenter analysis.

Gacci M, Simonato A, Lanciotti M, Ennas M, Varca V, Maffezzini M, Imbimbo C, Gontero P, Schiavina R, Carini M, Martorana G, Nicita G, Mirone V, Carmignani G.

Urol Int. 2013;91(1):62-8. doi: 10.1159/000346748. Epub 2013 May 28.

PMID:
23735440
15.

Prediction of pathological and oncological outcomes based on extended prostate biopsy results in patients with prostate cancer receiving radical prostatectomy: a single institution study.

Ishizaki F, Hara N, Koike H, Kawaguchi M, Tadokoro A, Takizawa I, Nishiyama T, Takahashi K, Hohenfellner R.

Diagn Pathol. 2012 Jun 14;7:68.

16.

Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Harty NJ, Kozinn SI, Canes D, Sorcini A, Moinzadeh A.

Int Braz J Urol. 2013 Sep-Oct;39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.05.05.

17.

Predictors of positive surgical margins and their location in Korean men undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Choo MS, Cho SY, Jeong CW, Lee SB, Ku JH, Hong SK, Byun SS, Kwak C, Kim HH, Lee SE, Jeong H.

Int J Urol. 2014 Sep;21(9):894-8. doi: 10.1111/iju.12465. Epub 2014 May 8.

18.

Rates of Positive Surgical Margins and Their Effect on Cancer-specific Mortality at Radical Prostatectomy for Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer.

Preisser F, Mazzone E, Knipper S, Nazzani S, Bandini M, Shariat SF, Tian Z, Saad F, Montorsi F, Zorn KC, Graefen M, Tilki D, Karakiewicz PI.

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e130-e139. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.09.024. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

PMID:
30366880
19.

[Peroperative biopsy of the sub-apical urethra during prostatectomy for cancer].

Ponthieu A, Delgrande J, Ivaldi A.

Prog Urol. 1996 Apr;6(2):250-5; discussion 255-6. French.

PMID:
8777418
20.

Non-apical positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer is associated with the highest risk of recurrence.

Røder MA, Kawa S, Scheike T, Toft BG, Hansen JB, Brasso K, Vainer B, Iversen P.

J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;109(8):818-22. doi: 10.1002/jso.23573. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

PMID:
24522971

Supplemental Content

Support Center