Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with nerve sparing vs. non-nerve sparing for high-risk prostate cancer cases.

Takahara K, Sumitomo M, Fukaya K, Jyoudai T, Nishino M, Hikichi M, Zennami K, Nukaya T, Ichino M, Fukami N, Sasaki H, Kusaka M, Shiroki R.

Oncol Lett. 2019 Oct;18(4):3896-3902. doi: 10.3892/ol.2019.10692. Epub 2019 Jul 31.

2.

Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Kumar A, Samavedi S, Bates AS, Mouraviev V, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel VR.

J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

PMID:
27435701
3.

Salvage robot assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity matched study of perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes.

Bates AS, Samavedi S, Kumar A, Mouraviev V, Rocco B, Coelho R, Palmer K, Patel VR.

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;41(11):1540-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 27.

PMID:
26163049
4.

Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.

de Carvalho PA, Barbosa JABA, Guglielmetti GB, Cordeiro MD, Rocco B, Nahas WC, Patel V, Coelho RF.

Eur Urol. 2018 Jul 21. pii: S0302-2838(18)30481-0. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.003. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30041833
5.

Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution.

Bonet X, Ogaya-Pinies G, Woodlief T, Hernandez-Cardona E, Ganapathi H, Rogers T, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Vigués F, Patel V.

BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):837-844. doi: 10.1111/bju.14517. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

6.

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of the Retzius-sparing Approach on Early Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Dalela D, Jeong W, Prasad MA, Sood A, Abdollah F, Diaz M, Karabon P, Sammon J, Jamil M, Baize B, Simone A, Menon M.

Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):677-685. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.029. Epub 2017 May 6.

PMID:
28483330
7.

Early biochemical recurrence, urinary continence and potency outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Berg KD, Thomsen FB, Hvarness H, Christensen IJ, Iversen P.

Scand J Urol. 2014 Aug;48(4):356-66. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.893534. Epub 2014 Mar 3.

PMID:
24579803
8.

Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Ko WJ, Hruby GW, Turk AT, Landman J, Badani KK.

BJU Int. 2013 Mar;111(3):451-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11393.x. Epub 2012 Aug 20.

9.

RARP in high-risk prostate cancer: use of multi-parametric MRI and nerve sparing techniques.

Wang JG, Huang J, Chin AI.

Asian J Androl. 2014 Sep-Oct;16(5):715-9. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.129942.

10.

How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer?

Punnen S, Meng MV, Cooperberg MR, Greene KL, Cowan JE, Carroll PR.

BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(4):E314-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11493.x. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

11.

A comparative study of robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy in 10 790 men treated by highly trained surgeons for both procedures.

Haese A, Knipper S, Isbarn H, Heinzer H, Tilki D, Salomon G, Michl U, Steuber T, Budäus L, Maurer T, Tennstedt P, Huland H, Graefen M.

BJU Int. 2019 Jun;123(6):1031-1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14760. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

PMID:
30927303
12.

The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich A, Kimm S, Menon M, Novara G, Tewari A, Touijer K, Wilson T, Zorn KC, Eggener SE.

Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):918-27. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.026. Epub 2013 May 18. Review.

PMID:
23721959
13.

The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting - a prospective observational comparative study.

Mirmilstein G, Rai BP, Gbolahan O, Srirangam V, Narula A, Agarwal S, Lane TM, Vasdev N, Adshead J.

BJU Int. 2018 Jun;121(6):854-862. doi: 10.1111/bju.14078. Epub 2017 Nov 30.

14.

Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence.

Kadono Y, Ueno S, Kadomoto S, Iwamoto H, Takezawa Y, Nakashima K, Nohara T, Izumi K, Mizokami A, Gabata T, Namiki M.

Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Nov;35(8):1034-1039. doi: 10.1002/nau.22877. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

PMID:
26352154
15.

Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Kowalczyk KJ, Huang AC, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Yu HY, Ulmer WD, Kaplan JR, Patel S, Nguyen PL, Hu JC.

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):536-47. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21620561
16.

The impact of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy on lower urinary tract function: Prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes and frequency volume charts.

Haga N, Hata J, Matsuoka K, Koguchi T, Akaihata H, Kataoka M, Sato Y, Ogawa S, Ishibashi K, Kojima Y.

Neurourol Urodyn. 2018 Jan;37(1):322-330. doi: 10.1002/nau.23297. Epub 2017 Apr 28.

PMID:
28452451
17.

Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Kumar A, Samavedi S, Mouraviev V, Bates AS, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel VR.

J Robot Surg. 2017 Mar;11(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0606-8. Epub 2016 May 31.

PMID:
27245233
18.

Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy After Previous Prostate Surgery.

Tugcu V, Atar A, Sahin S, Kargi T, Gokhan Seker K, IlkerComez Y, IhsanTasci A.

JSLS. 2015 Sep-Dec;19(4). pii: e2015.00080. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00080.

19.

Neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy followed by robot-assisted and minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: comparison of perioperative and oncological outcomes at single institution.

Fujita N, Koie T, Hashimoto Y, Narita T, Tobisawa Y, Tanaka T, Noro D, Oikawa M, Hagiwara K, Yoneyama T, Imai A, Yamamoto H, Hatakeyama S, Yoneyama T, Ohyama C.

Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Nov;50(11):1999-2005. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1985-8. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

PMID:
30229466
20.

Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Kumar A, Tandon S, Samavedi S, Mouraviev V, Bates AS, Patel VR.

J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):187-200. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0607-7. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
27251473

Supplemental Content

Support Center