Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 111

1.

Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on biochemical recurrence in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.

Preisser F, Coxilha G, Heinze A, Oh S, Chun FK, Sauter G, Pompe RS, Huland H, Graefen M, Tilki D.

Prostate. 2019 Sep 25. doi: 10.1002/pros.23908. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31553506
2.

Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.

Chapin BF, Nguyen JN, Achim MF, Navai N, Williams SB, Prokhorova IN, Wang X, Tapia EMLN, Davis JW, Troncoso P.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Jun;21(2):221-227. doi: 10.1038/s41391-017-0019-4. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

PMID:
29230008
3.

Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.

Chalfin HJ, Dinizo M, Trock BJ, Feng Z, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Humphreys E, Han M.

BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1684-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11371.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

4.

Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Viers BR, Sukov WR, Gettman MT, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Frank I, Tollefson MK, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ.

Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

PMID:
25052213
5.

Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.

O'Neil LM, Walsh S, Cohen RJ, Lee S.

BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116 Suppl 3:42-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13173. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

6.

High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.

Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP, Rasiah KK, Haynes AM, Chatfield M, Stricker PD, Turner JJ, Delprado W, Henshall SM, Sutherland RL, Kench JG.

BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(12):1794-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10572.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

7.

Prognostic significance of a positive surgical margin in pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer.

Ahyai SA, Zacharias M, Isbarn H, Steuber T, Eichelberg C, Köllermann J, Fisch M, Karakiewicz PI, Huland H, Graefen M, Chun FK.

BJU Int. 2010 Aug;106(4):478-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09162.x. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

8.

Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.

Maxeiner A, Magheli A, Jöhrens K, Kilic E, Braun TL, Kempkensteffen C, Hinz S, Stephan C, Miller K, Busch J.

BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):750-757. doi: 10.1111/bju.13451. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

9.

Short (≤ 1 mm) positive surgical margin and risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Shikanov S, Marchetti P, Desai V, Razmaria A, Antic T, Al-Ahmadie H, Zagaja G, Eggener S, Brendler C, Shalhav A.

BJU Int. 2013 Apr;111(4):559-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11340.x. Epub 2012 Jul 3.

10.

Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?

Pettenati C, Neuzillet Y, Radulescu C, Hervé JM, Molinié V, Lebret T.

World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):1973-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1580-x. Epub 2015 May 5.

PMID:
25939539
11.

Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.

Song W, Lee DH, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Lee HM, Choi HY, Kim JW, Lee S, Byun SS, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Cho JS, Ahn H, Jeon SS.

J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov;143(11):2393-2400. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2502-7. Epub 2017 Aug 19.

PMID:
28823006
12.

Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.

Martini A, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Scarcella S, Robesti D, Barletta F, Cucchiara V, Mirone V, Montorsi F, Briganti A.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Apr 4. pii: S2588-9311(19)30039-2. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.03.006. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31411971
13.
14.

Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.

Dev HS, Wiklund P, Patel V, Parashar D, Palmer K, Nyberg T, Skarecky D, Neal DE, Ahlering T, Sooriakumaran P.

Urol Oncol. 2015 Mar;33(3):109.e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

PMID:
25512161
15.

The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.

Evren I, Hacıislamoğlu A, Ekşi M, Yavuzsan AH, Baytekin F, Çolakoğlu Y, Canoğlu D, Tugcu V.

Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jan-Feb;45(1):45-53. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0702.

16.

Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ha YS, Kang DI, Kim JH, Joung JY, Yu J, Parihar JS, Salmasi AH, Horie S, Kim WJ, Yi Kim I.

Can J Urol. 2014 Jun;21(3):7290-7.

PMID:
24978359
17.

Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

18.

Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.

Wadhwa H, Terris MK, Aronson WJ, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Cooperberg MR, Freedland SJ, Abern MR.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Dec;19(4):423-428. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.45. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

PMID:
27698440
19.

Predictors of biochemical recurrence in pT3b prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy.

Pagano MJ, Whalen MJ, Paulucci DJ, Reddy BN, Matulay JT, Rothberg M, Scarberry K, Patel T, Shapiro EY, RoyChoudhury A, McKiernan J, Benson MC, Badani KK.

Prostate. 2016 Feb;76(2):226-34. doi: 10.1002/pros.23114. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

PMID:
26481325
20.

Percentage of high-grade tumour volume does not meaningfully improve prediction of early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared with Gleason score.

Hansen J, Bianchi M, Sun M, Rink M, Castiglione F, Abdollah F, Steuber T, Ahyai SA, Steurer S, Göbel C, Freschi M, Montorsi F, Shariat SF, Fisch M, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Chun FK.

BJU Int. 2014 Mar;113(3):399-407. doi: 10.1111/bju.12424. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

Supplemental Content

Support Center