Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Physician Beliefs About Online Reporting of Quality and Experience Data.

Lagu T, Haskell J, Cooper E, Harris DA, Murray A, Gardner RL.

J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug 28. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05267-1. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31463685
2.

Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses.

McCleery E, Christensen V, Peterson K, Humphrey L, Helfand M.

VA Evidence Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011-.
2014 Sep.

3.

Public Awareness, Usage, and Predictors for the Use of Doctor Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study in England.

Patel S, Cain R, Neailey K, Hooberman L.

J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 25;20(7):e243. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9523.

4.

Sources of traffic and visitors' preferences regarding online public reports of quality: web analytics and online survey results.

Bardach NS, Hibbard JH, Greaves F, Dudley RA.

J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 1;17(5):e102. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3637.

5.

Physician and Patient Views on Public Physician Rating Websites: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Holliday AM, Kachalia A, Meyer GS, Sequist TD.

J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):626-631. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-3982-5. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

6.

Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.

Kadry B, Chu LF, Kadry B, Gammas D, Macario A.

J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 16;13(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1960.

7.

Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study.

Emmert M, Meier F, Pisch F, Sander U.

J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 28;15(8):e187. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2702.

8.

Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.

McLennan S, Strech D, Meyer A, Kahrass H.

J Med Internet Res. 2017 Nov 9;19(11):e387. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7581.

9.

Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?

Hageman MG, Ring DC, Gregory PJ, Rubash HE, Harmon L.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.

10.

The present and future of quality measures and public reporting in neurosurgery.

Bekelis K, McGirt MJ, Parker SL, Holland CM, Davies J, Devin CJ, Atkins T, Knightly J, Groman R, Zyung I, Asher AL.

Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Dec;39(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.FOCUS15354.

PMID:
26621417
11.

A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period.

Gao GG, McCullough JS, Agarwal R, Jha AK.

J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 24;14(1):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2003.

12.

Parental awareness and use of online physician rating sites.

Hanauer DA, Zheng K, Singer DC, Gebremariam A, Davis MM.

Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):e966-75. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0681. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

PMID:
25246629
13.

Primary care physicians' use of publicly reported quality data in hospital referral decisions.

Morsi E, Lindenauer PK, Rothberg MB.

J Hosp Med. 2012 May-Jun;7(5):370-5. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1931. Epub 2012 Feb 29.

PMID:
22378738
14.

Physician rating websites: do radiologists have an online presence?

Gilbert K, Hawkins CM, Hughes DR, Patel K, Gogia N, Sekhar A, Duszak R Jr.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Aug;12(8):867-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.039.

PMID:
26250980
15.

Reporting of Patient Experience Data on Health Systems' Websites and Commercial Physician-Rating Websites: Mixed-Methods Analysis.

Lagu T, Norton CM, Russo LM, Priya A, Goff SL, Lindenauer PK.

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 27;21(3):e12007. doi: 10.2196/12007.

16.

Evidence Brief: Effectiveness of Intensive Primary Care Programs.

Peterson K, Helfand M, Humphrey L, Christensen V, Carson S.

VA Evidence Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011-.
2013 Feb.

17.

Do German public reporting websites provide information that office-based physicians consider before referring patients to hospital? A four-step analysis.

Kolb B, Emmert M, Sander U, Patzelt C, Schöffski O.

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Nov;137-138:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Sep 3. Review.

PMID:
30190204
18.

[Do online ratings reflect structural differences in healthcare? The example of German physician-rating websites].

Meszmer N, Jaegers L, Schöffski O, Emmert M.

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Apr;131-132:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.11.007. Epub 2018 Jan 10. German.

PMID:
29331281
19.

Association Between Physician Online Rating and Quality of Care.

Okike K, Peter-Bibb TK, Xie KC, Okike ON.

J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 13;18(12):e324.

20.

Digital Footprint of Neurological Surgeons.

Kim C, Gupta R, Shah A, Madill E, Prabhu AV, Agarwal N.

World Neurosurg. 2018 May;113:e172-e178. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.210. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

PMID:
29427816

Supplemental Content

Support Center