Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: the role of prognostic grade group and index tumor nodule.

Vau N, Henriques V, Cheng L, Blanca A, Fonseca J, Montironi R, Cimadamore A, Lopez-Beltran A.

Hum Pathol. 2019 Aug 20. pii: S0046-8177(19)30151-0. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2019.08.012. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31442520
2.

High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.

Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP, Rasiah KK, Haynes AM, Chatfield M, Stricker PD, Turner JJ, Delprado W, Henshall SM, Sutherland RL, Kench JG.

BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(12):1794-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10572.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

3.

Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Cheng L, Jones TD, Lin H, Eble JN, Zeng G, Carr MD, Koch MO.

J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2181-5.

PMID:
16280760
4.
5.

Significance of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason score 7 radical prostatectomy specimens.

Whittemore DE, Hick EJ, Carter MR, Moul JW, Miranda-Sousa AJ, Sexton WJ.

J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):516-22; discussion 522.

PMID:
18076949
6.

Lack of association of prostate carcinoma nuclear grading with prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Zhou M, Hayasaka S, Taylor JM, Shah R, Proverbs-Singh T, Manley S, Rubin MA.

J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2193-7.

PMID:
11696734
8.

Gleason Pattern 5 is a Possible Pathologic Predictor for Biochemical Recurrence after Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy

Ikeda M, Amano N, Sakata Y, Honda T, Tachibana T, Hirano S, Yamashita H, Ishii J, Irie A.

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Mar 26;20(3):783-788.

9.

Prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in Japanese men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.

Miyake H, Muramaki M, Furukawa J, Tanaka H, Inoue TA, Fujisawa M.

Urol Oncol. 2013 Nov;31(8):1511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 May 31.

PMID:
22658882
10.

[Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence free survival after radical prostatectomy with positive surgical margins].

Roux V, Eyraud R, Brureau L, Gourtaud G, Senechal C, Fofana M, Blanchet P.

Prog Urol. 2017 Jun - Jul;27(8-9):467-473. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 30. French.

PMID:
28576421
11.

[Perioperative parameters and prognosis analysis of patients aged 80 years or older treated with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer].

Zhang F, Zhang SD, Xiao CL, Huang Y, Ma LL.

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Oct 18;50(5):822-827. Chinese.

12.

Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Hattab EM, Koch MO, Eble JN, Lin H, Cheng L.

J Urol. 2006 May;175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699.

PMID:
16600733
13.

Early prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction on the basis of preoperative and postoperative tumor characteristics.

Graefen M, Noldus J, Pichlmeier U, Haese A, Hammerer P, Fernandez S, Conrad S, Henke R, Huland E, Huland H.

Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):21-30.

PMID:
10364651
14.

Seminal vesicle involvement after radical prostatectomy: predicting risk factors for progression.

Salomon L, Anastasiadis AG, Johnson CW, McKiernan JM, Goluboff ET, Abbou CC, Olsson CA, Benson MC.

Urology. 2003 Aug;62(2):304-9.

PMID:
12893340
15.

Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrence.

Capitanio U, Scattoni V, Freschi M, Briganti A, Salonia A, Gallina A, Colombo R, Karakiewicz PI, Rigatti P, Montorsi F.

Eur Urol. 2008 Jul;54(1):118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.018. Epub 2008 Feb 26.

PMID:
18314255
16.

Integrating tertiary Gleason pattern 5 into the ISUP grading system improves prediction of biochemical recurrence in radical prostatectomy patients.

Kato M, Hirakawa A, Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto A, Ishida R, Kamihira O, Kimura T, Majima T, Ishida S, Funahashi Y, Sassa N, Fujita T, Matsukawa Y, Yamamoto T, Hattori R, Gotoh M, Tsuzuki T.

Mod Pathol. 2019 Jan;32(1):122-127. doi: 10.1038/s41379-018-0121-8. Epub 2018 Sep 4.

PMID:
30181565
17.

Prediction of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: analysis of 784 Japanese patients.

Hashimoto T, Yoshioka K, Nagao G, Nakagami Y, Ohno Y, Horiguchi Y, Namiki K, Nakashima J, Tachibana M.

Int J Urol. 2015 Feb;22(2):188-93. doi: 10.1111/iju.12624. Epub 2014 Oct 22.

18.

Predictive factors for short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients.

Kanehira M, Takata R, Ishii S, Ito A, Ikarashi D, Matsuura T, Kato Y, Obara W.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2019 Sep;24(9):1099-1104. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01445-7. Epub 2019 Apr 10.

PMID:
30972506
19.

Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.

Kupelian PA, Katcher J, Levin HS, Klein EA.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997 Mar 15;37(5):1043-52.

PMID:
9169811
20.

Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in Gleason 7 prostate cancer predicts pathological stage and biochemical recurrence.

Sim HG, Telesca D, Culp SH, Ellis WJ, Lange PH, True LD, Lin DW.

J Urol. 2008 May;179(5):1775-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.016. Epub 2008 Mar 17.

PMID:
18343432

Supplemental Content

Support Center