Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Defining Clinically Meaningful Positive Surgical Margins in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy for Localised Prostate Cancer.

Martini A, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Scuderi S, Bravi CA, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Scarcella S, Robesti D, Barletta F, Cucchiara V, Mirone V, Montorsi F, Briganti A.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Apr 4. pii: S2588-9311(19)30039-2. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.03.006. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31411971
2.

Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.

Wadhwa H, Terris MK, Aronson WJ, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Cooperberg MR, Freedland SJ, Abern MR.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Dec;19(4):423-428. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.45. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

PMID:
27698440
3.

Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.

Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.

BJU Int. 2011 Jun;107(11):1748-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09728.x. Epub 2010 Sep 30.

4.

The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Sooriakumaran P, Ploumidis A, Nyberg T, Olsson M, Akre O, Haendler L, Egevad L, Nilsson A, Carlsson S, Jonsson M, Adding C, Hosseini A, Steineck G, Wiklund P.

BJU Int. 2015 Jan;115(1):106-13. doi: 10.1111/bju.12483.

5.

Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.

Maxeiner A, Magheli A, Jöhrens K, Kilic E, Braun TL, Kempkensteffen C, Hinz S, Stephan C, Miller K, Busch J.

BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):750-757. doi: 10.1111/bju.13451. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

6.

High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.

Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP, Rasiah KK, Haynes AM, Chatfield M, Stricker PD, Turner JJ, Delprado W, Henshall SM, Sutherland RL, Kench JG.

BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(12):1794-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10572.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

7.

Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.

Fossati N, Karnes RJ, Cozzarini C, Fiorino C, Gandaglia G, Joniau S, Boorjian SA, Goldner G, Hinkelbein W, Haustermans K, Tombal B, Shariat S, Karakiewicz PI, Montorsi F, Van Poppel H, Wiegel T, Briganti A.

Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):728-733. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

PMID:
26497924
8.

Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.

De La Roca RL, Da Cunha IW, Bezerra SM, Da Fonseca FP.

Int Braz J Urol. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):306-15. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.03.

9.

Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality.

Chalfin HJ, Dinizo M, Trock BJ, Feng Z, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Humphreys E, Han M.

BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11):1684-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11371.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

10.

Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.

Dev HS, Wiklund P, Patel V, Parashar D, Palmer K, Nyberg T, Skarecky D, Neal DE, Ahlering T, Sooriakumaran P.

Urol Oncol. 2015 Mar;33(3):109.e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

PMID:
25512161
11.

Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging.

Ouzzane A, Rozet F, Salas RS, Galiano M, Barret E, Prapotnich D, Cathelineau X.

BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):586-91. doi: 10.1111/bju.12249. Epub 2013 Jul 26.

12.

Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Viers BR, Sukov WR, Gettman MT, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Frank I, Tollefson MK, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ.

Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.004. Epub 2014 Jul 19.

PMID:
25052213
13.

Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer Registry.

Evans SM, Millar JL, Frydenberg M, Murphy DG, Davis ID, Spelman T, Bolton DM, Giles GG, Dean J, Costello AJ, Frauman AG, Kearns PA, Day L, Daniels C, McNeill JJ.

BJU Int. 2014 Nov;114(5):680-90. doi: 10.1111/bju.12509. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

14.

Long-term impact of positive surgical margins on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: ten years of follow-up.

Rouanne M, Rode J, Campeggi A, Allory Y, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, De La Taille A, Salomon L.

Scand J Urol. 2014 Apr;48(2):131-7. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2013.813067. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

PMID:
23883410
15.

Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer.

Oh JJ, Hong SK, Byun SS, Choe G, Lee SE.

Urol Oncol. 2013 Jul;31(5):595-600. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.05.003. Epub 2011 Jun 11.

PMID:
21658977
16.

Impact of Multifocality and Multilocation of Positive Surgical Margin After Radical Prostatectomy on Predicting Oncological Outcome.

Wu S, Lin SX, Wirth GJ, Lu M, Lu J, Subtelny AO, Wang Z, Dahl DM, Olumi AF, Wu CL.

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e44-e52. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

PMID:
30287224
17.

Association of Anterior and Lateral Extraprostatic Extensions with Base-Positive Resection Margins in Prostate Cancer.

Kang YJ, Abalajon MJ, Jang WS, Kwon JK, Yoon CY, Lee JY, Cho KS, Ham WS, Choi YD.

PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158922. eCollection 2016.

18.

Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.

Sachdeva A, Veeratterapillay R, Voysey A, Kelly K, Johnson MI, Aning J, Soomro NA.

BMC Urol. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0262-y.

19.

Radical prostatectomy: positive surgical margins matter.

Meeks JJ, Eastham JA.

Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):974-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.12.011. Epub 2012 Jan 11. Review.

PMID:
22244265
20.

Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?

Pfitzenmaier J, Pahernik S, Tremmel T, Haferkamp A, Buse S, Hohenfellner M.

BJU Int. 2008 Nov;102(10):1413-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07791.x. Epub 2008 Jun 4.

Supplemental Content

Support Center