Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 126

1.

A Multicentre Analysis of the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Following Transperineal Image-fusion Targeted and Nontargeted Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men at Risk.

Miah S, Hosking-Jervis F, Connor MJ, Eldred-Evans D, Shah TT, Arya M, Barber N, Bhardwa J, Bott S, Burke D, Doherty A, Foster C, Freeman A, Hindley R, Jameson C, Karim O, Laniado M, Montgomery B, Nigam R, Punwani S, Sinclair A, Winkler M, Allen C, Ahmed HU.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Mar 29. pii: S2588-9311(19)30038-0. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.03.005. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31411968
2.

Accuracy of Transperineal Targeted Prostate Biopsies, Visual Estimation and Image Fusion in Men Needing Repeat Biopsy in the PICTURE Trial.

Simmons LAM, Kanthabalan A, Arya M, Briggs T, Barratt D, Charman SC, Freeman A, Hawkes D, Hu Y, Jameson C, McCartan N, Moore CM, Punwani S, van der Muelen J, Emberton M, Ahmed HU.

J Urol. 2018 Dec;200(6):1227-1234. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 11.

PMID:
30017964
3.

Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.

Kuru TH, Roethke MC, Seidenader J, Simpfendörfer T, Boxler S, Alammar K, Rieker P, Popeneciu VI, Roth W, Pahernik S, Schlemmer HP, Hohenfellner M, Hadaschik BA.

J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4):1380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.043. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

PMID:
23608676
4.

Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy.

Hansen NL, Kesch C, Barrett T, Koo B, Radtke JP, Bonekamp D, Schlemmer HP, Warren AY, Wieczorek K, Hohenfellner M, Kastner C, Hadaschik B.

BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):631-638. doi: 10.1111/bju.13711. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

5.

Multicentre evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging supported transperineal prostate biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with suspicion of prostate cancer.

Hansen NL, Barrett T, Kesch C, Pepdjonovic L, Bonekamp D, O'Sullivan R, Distler F, Warren A, Samel C, Hadaschik B, Grummet J, Kastner C.

BJU Int. 2018 Jul;122(1):40-49. doi: 10.1111/bju.14049. Epub 2017 Nov 15.

6.

Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Kasivisvanathan V, Dufour R, Moore CM, Ahmed HU, Abd-Alazeez M, Charman SC, Freeman A, Allen C, Kirkham A, van der Meulen J, Emberton M.

J Urol. 2013 Mar;189(3):860-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

PMID:
23063807
7.

Magnetic Resonance and Ultrasound Image Fusion Supported Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Using the Ginsburg Protocol: Technique, Learning Points, and Biopsy Results.

Hansen N, Patruno G, Wadhwa K, Gaziev G, Miano R, Barrett T, Gnanapragasam V, Doble A, Warren A, Bratt O, Kastner C.

Eur Urol. 2016 Aug;70(2):332-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.064. Epub 2016 Mar 16.

PMID:
26995327
8.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsy Evaluated by Transperineal Template Saturation Prostate Biopsy for the Detection and Characterization of Prostate Cancer.

Mortezavi A, Märzendorfer O, Donati OF, Rizzi G, Rupp NJ, Wettstein MS, Gross O, Sulser T, Hermanns T, Eberli D.

J Urol. 2018 Aug;200(2):309-318. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.067. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

PMID:
29474846
9.

The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.

Patel N, Cricco-Lizza E, Kasabwala K, Xu C, Robinson BD, Khani F, Wang Y, Margolis D, Hu JC.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Sep;1(4):263-267. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 May 15. Erratum in: Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Aug 1;:.

10.

The SmartTarget Biopsy Trial: A Prospective, Within-person Randomised, Blinded Trial Comparing the Accuracy of Visual-registration and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Image-fusion Targeted Biopsies for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification.

Hamid S, Donaldson IA, Hu Y, Rodell R, Villarini B, Bonmati E, Tranter P, Punwani S, Sidhu HS, Willis S, van der Meulen J, Hawkes D, McCartan N, Potyka I, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Freeman A, Moore CM, Barratt D, Emberton M, Ahmed HU.

Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):733-740. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

11.

Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.

van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israël B, Hendriks R, Padhani AR, Hoogenboom M, Zamecnik P, Bakker D, Setiasti AY, Veltman J, van den Hout H, van der Lelij H, van Oort I, Klaver S, Debruyne F, Sedelaar M, Hannink G, Rovers M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Barentsz JO.

Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

12.

Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.

Radtke JP, Kuru TH, Boxler S, Alt CD, Popeneciu IV, Huettenbrink C, Klein T, Steinemann S, Bergstraesser C, Roethke M, Roth W, Schlemmer HP, Hohenfellner M, Hadaschik BA.

J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):87-94. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.098. Epub 2014 Jul 28.

PMID:
25079939
13.

Accuracy of real-time magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion image-guided transperineal target biopsy with needle tracking with a mechanical position-encoded stepper in detecting significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men.

Shoji S, Hiraiwa S, Ogawa T, Kawakami M, Nakano M, Hashida K, Sato Y, Hasebe T, Uchida T, Tajiri T.

Int J Urol. 2017 Apr;24(4):288-294. doi: 10.1111/iju.13306. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

14.

Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Borkowetz A, Platzek I, Toma M, Laniado M, Baretton G, Froehner M, Koch R, Wirth M, Zastrow S.

BJU Int. 2015 Dec;116(6):873-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13023. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

15.

Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Stabile A, Dell'Oglio P, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Brembilla G, Cristel G, Dehò F, Scattoni V, Maga T, Losa A, Gaboardi F, Cardone G, Esposito A, De Cobelli F, Del Maschio A, Montorsi F, Briganti A.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;1(2):120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 May 15.

PMID:
31100235
16.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided In-bore and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsies: An Adjusted Comparison of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate.

Costa DN, Goldberg K, Leon AD, Lotan Y, Xi Y, Aziz M, Freifeld Y, Margulis V, Raj G, Roehrborn CG, Hornberger B, Desai N, Bagrodia A, Francis F, Pedrosa I, Cadeddu JA.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Jul;2(4):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.08.022. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

PMID:
31277776
17.

Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Pepe P, Garufi A, Priolo G, Pennisi M.

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Feb;15(1):e33-e36. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 21.

PMID:
27530436
18.

Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, Ehdaie B, Hadaschik BA, Marks LS, Mozer P, Rastinehad AR, Ahmed HU.

Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.026. Epub 2014 Nov 1. Review.

PMID:
25454618
19.

First report of robot-assisted transperineal fusion versus off-target biopsy in patients undergoing repeat prostate biopsy.

Kaufmann S, Mischinger J, Amend B, Rausch S, Adam M, Scharpf M, Fend F, Kramer U, Notohamiprodjo M, Nikolaou K, Stenzl A, Bedke J, Kruck S.

World J Urol. 2017 Jul;35(7):1023-1029. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1970-8. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

PMID:
27847972
20.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Micro-ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Lughezzani G, Saita A, Lazzeri M, Paciotti M, Maffei D, Lista G, Hurle R, Buffi NM, Guazzoni G, Casale P.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 May;2(3):329-332. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

PMID:
31200848

Supplemental Content

Support Center