Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 113

1.

Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy With Systematic Biopsy Alone for the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Elwenspoek MMC, Sheppard AL, McInnes MDF, Merriel SWD, Rowe EWJ, Bryant RJ, Donovan JL, Whiting P.

JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198427. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8427.

2.

Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.

Tonttila PP, Lantto J, Pääkkö E, Piippo U, Kauppila S, Lammentausta E, Ohtonen P, Vaarala MH.

Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 29.

PMID:
26033153
3.

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-stratified Clinical Pathways and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Biopsy Pathway for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Woo S, Suh CH, Eastham JA, Zelefsky MJ, Morris MJ, Abida W, Scher HI, Sidlow R, Becker AS, Wibmer AG, Hricak H, Vargas HA.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Jun 13. pii: S2588-9311(19)30071-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.05.004. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

PMID:
31204311
4.

Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.

Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4:CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.

PMID:
31022301
5.

Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Bangma CH, Steyerberg EW, Hunink MG.

Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):438-50. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.037. Epub 2014 Dec 3. Review.

PMID:
25480312
6.

Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.

van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israël B, Hendriks R, Padhani AR, Hoogenboom M, Zamecnik P, Bakker D, Setiasti AY, Veltman J, van den Hout H, van der Lelij H, van Oort I, Klaver S, Debruyne F, Sedelaar M, Hannink G, Rovers M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Barentsz JO.

Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):570-578. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

7.

Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.

Arsov C, Rabenalt R, Blondin D, Quentin M, Hiester A, Godehardt E, Gabbert HE, Becker N, Antoch G, Albers P, Schimmöller L.

Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):713-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

PMID:
26116294
8.

Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes.

Meng X, Rosenkrantz AB, Mendhiratta N, Fenstermaker M, Huang R, Wysock JS, Bjurlin MA, Marshall S, Deng FM, Zhou M, Melamed J, Huang WC, Lepor H, Taneja SS.

Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):512-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 22.

9.

What Is the Negative Predictive Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Excluding Prostate Cancer at Biopsy? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis from the European Association of Urology Prostate Cancer Guidelines Panel.

Moldovan PC, Van den Broeck T, Sylvester R, Marconi L, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, Briers E, Cumberbatch MG, Fossati N, Gross T, Henry AM, Joniau S, van der Kwast TH, Matveev VB, van der Poel HG, De Santis M, Schoots IG, Wiegel T, Yuan CY, Cornford P, Mottet N, Lam TB, Rouvière O.

Eur Urol. 2017 Aug;72(2):250-266. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 21. Review.

PMID:
28336078
10.

Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Schoots IG, Nieboer D, Giganti F, Moore CM, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ.

BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):946-958. doi: 10.1111/bju.14358. Epub 2018 Jun 6.

PMID:
29679430
11.

Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review.

Valerio M, Donaldson I, Emberton M, Ehdaie B, Hadaschik BA, Marks LS, Mozer P, Rastinehad AR, Ahmed HU.

Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):8-19. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.026. Epub 2014 Nov 1. Review.

PMID:
25454618
12.

High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.

van der Leest M, Israël B, Cornel EB, Zámecnik P, Schoots IG, van der Lelij H, Padhani AR, Rovers M, van Oort I, Sedelaar M, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Hannink G, Veltman J, Barentsz J.

Eur Urol. 2019 Jun 2. pii: S0302-2838(19)30436-1. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.05.029. [Epub ahead of print]

13.

Comparison of Prostate Biopsy with or without Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection: An Observational Cohort Study.

Bryant RJ, Hobbs CP, Eyre KS, Davies LC, Sullivan ME, Shields W, Sooriakumaran P, Verrill CL, Gleeson FV, MacPherson RE, Hamdy FC, Brewster SF.

J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):510-519. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.09.049.

PMID:
30266332
14.

Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging, with or Without Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy, and Systematic Biopsy for Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Drost FH, Osses D, Nieboer D, Bangma CH, Steyerberg EW, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG.

Eur Urol. 2019 Jul 17. pii: S0302-2838(19)30513-5. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.023. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

PMID:
31326219
15.

The prostate cancer detection rates of CEUS-targeted versus MRI-targeted versus systematic TRUS-guided biopsies in biopsy-naïve men: a prospective, comparative clinical trial using the same patients.

Postema AW, Scheltema MJ, Mannaerts CK, Van Sloun RJ, Idzenga T, Mischi M, Engelbrecht MR, De la Rosette JJ, Wijkstra H.

BMC Urol. 2017 Apr 5;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0213-7.

16.

Comparing Three Different Techniques for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsies: A Systematic Review of In-bore versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound fusion versus Cognitive Registration. Is There a Preferred Technique?

Wegelin O, van Melick HHE, Hooft L, Bosch JLHR, Reitsma HB, Barentsz JO, Somford DM.

Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):517-531. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.07.041. Epub 2016 Aug 25. Review.

PMID:
27568655
17.

Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.

Alberts AR, Schoots IG, Bokhorst LP, van Leenders GJ, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ.

Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.018. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

PMID:
26651990
18.

The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Mowatt G, Scotland G, Boachie C, Cruickshank M, Ford JA, Fraser C, Kurban L, Lam TB, Padhani AR, Royle J, Scheenen TW, Tassie E.

Health Technol Assess. 2013 May;17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. doi: 10.3310/hta17200. Review.

19.

Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.

Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmöller L, Albers P, Arsov C.

Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

PMID:
30082150
20.

Magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer detection and management: a systematic review.

Monni F, Fontanella P, Grasso A, Wiklund P, Ou YC, Randazzo M, Rocco B, Montanari E, Bianchi G.

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Dec;69(6):567-578. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02819-3. Epub 2017 May 8. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center