Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 106

1.

Keratinocytes protect soft-tissue integration of dental implant materials against bacterial challenges in a 3D-tissue infection model.

Ren X, van der Mei HC, Ren Y, Busscher HJ.

Acta Biomater. 2019 Sep 15;96:237-246. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.015. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

PMID:
31302293
2.

Soft tissue integration versus early biofilm formation on different dental implant materials.

Zhao B, van der Mei HC, Subbiahdoss G, de Vries J, Rustema-Abbing M, Kuijer R, Busscher HJ, Ren Y.

Dent Mater. 2014 Jul;30(7):716-27. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

PMID:
24793200
3.

Osteoblast integration of dental implant materials after challenge by sub-gingival pathogens: a co-culture study in vitro.

Zhao B, van der Mei HC, Rustema-Abbing M, Busscher HJ, Ren Y.

Int J Oral Sci. 2015 Dec 18;7(4):250-8. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2015.45.

4.

Adherence of human oral keratinocytes and gingival fibroblasts to nano-structured titanium surfaces.

Dorkhan M, Yücel-Lindberg T, Hall J, Svensäter G, Davies JR.

BMC Oral Health. 2014 Jun 21;14:75. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-75.

5.

Co-culturing epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts on nano-structured titanium surfaces.

Tan J, Zhao C, Zhou J, Duan K, Wang J, Lu X, Weng J, Feng B.

Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017 Sep 1;78:288-295. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.036. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

PMID:
28575986
6.

Development of a novel model for the investigation of implant-soft tissue interface.

Chai WL, Moharamzadeh K, Brook IM, Emanuelsson L, Palmquist A, van Noort R.

J Periodontol. 2010 Aug;81(8):1187-95. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.090648.

PMID:
20450401
7.
8.

Contour analysis of an implant--soft tissue interface.

Chai WL, Moharamzadeh K, van Noort R, Emanuelsson L, Palmquist A, Brook IM.

J Periodontal Res. 2013 Oct;48(5):663-70. doi: 10.1111/jre.12062. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

PMID:
23442017
9.

Comparative adsorption profiles of basal lamina proteome and gingival cells onto dental and titanium surfaces.

Abdallah MN, Abughanam G, Tran SD, Sheikh Z, Mezour MA, Basiri T, Xiao Y, Cerruti M, Siqueira WL, Tamimi F.

Acta Biomater. 2018 Jun;73:547-558. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.017. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

PMID:
29660511
10.

Macrophage behavior and interplay with gingival fibroblasts cultured on six commercially available titanium, zirconium, and titanium-zirconium dental implants.

Wang Y, Zhang Y, Sculean A, Bosshardt DD, Miron RJ.

Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Aug;23(8):3219-3227. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2736-z. Epub 2018 Nov 10.

PMID:
30415441
11.

Initial attachment, subsequent cell proliferation/viability and gene expression of epithelial cells related to attachment and wound healing in response to different titanium surfaces.

An N, Rausch-fan X, Wieland M, Matejka M, Andrukhov O, Schedle A.

Dent Mater. 2012 Dec;28(12):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.007. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

PMID:
23083807
12.

Intraosseous transcutaneous amputation prostheses versus dental implants: a comparison between keratinocyte and gingival epithelial cell adhesion in vitro.

Pendegrass CJ, Lancashire HT, Fontaine C, Chan G, Hosseini P, Blunn GW.

Eur Cell Mater. 2015 Apr 19;29:237-49.

13.

Histatin 1 Enhances Cell Adhesion to Titanium in an Implant Integration Model.

van Dijk IA, Beker AF, Jellema W, Nazmi K, Wu G, Wismeijer D, Krawczyk PM, Bolscher JG, Veerman EC, Stap J.

J Dent Res. 2017 Apr;96(4):430-436. doi: 10.1177/0022034516681761. Epub 2017 Jan 3.

PMID:
27941125
14.

Biological basis for soft tissue management in implant dentistry.

Yeung SC.

Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53 Suppl 1:S39-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00040.x. Review.

15.

Selective responses of human gingival fibroblasts and bacteria on carbon fiber reinforced polyetheretherketone with multilevel nanostructured TiO2.

Wang X, Lu T, Wen J, Xu L, Zeng D, Wu Q, Cao L, Lin S, Liu X, Jiang X.

Biomaterials. 2016 Mar;83:207-18. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

PMID:
26774566
16.

Strategies for Optimizing the Soft Tissue Seal around Osseointegrated Implants.

Abdallah MN, Badran Z, Ciobanu O, Hamdan N, Tamimi F.

Adv Healthc Mater. 2017 Oct;6(20). doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700549. Epub 2017 Sep 27. Review.

PMID:
28960892
17.

Surface modification of zirconia with polydopamine to enhance fibroblast response and decrease bacterial activity in vitro: A potential technique for soft tissue engineering applications.

Liu M, Zhou J, Yang Y, Zheng M, Yang J, Tan J.

Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015 Dec 1;136:74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.06.047. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

PMID:
26363269
18.

Response of soft tissue to different abutment materials with different surface topographies: a review of the literature.

Al Rezk F, Trimpou G, Lauer HC, Weigl P, Krockow N.

Gen Dent. 2018 Jan-Feb;66(1):18-25. Review.

PMID:
29303758
19.

Healing after standardized clinical probing of the perlimplant soft tissue seal: a histomorphometric study in dogs.

Etter TH, Håkanson I, Lang NP, Trejo PM, Caffesse RG.

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002 Dec;13(6):571-80.

PMID:
12519330
20.

Evaluation of a novel oral mucosa in vitro implantation model for analysis of molecular interactions with dental abutment surfaces.

Roffel S, Wu G, Nedeljkovic I, Meyer M, Razafiarison T, Gibbs S.

Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Mar;21 Suppl 1:25-33. doi: 10.1111/cid.12750. Epub 2019 Mar 12.

Supplemental Content

Support Center