Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 107

1.

Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.

Srigley JR, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Billis A, Cheng L, Clouston D, Evans A, Furusato B, Kench J, Leite K, MacLennan G, Moch H, Pan CC, Rioux-Leclercq N, Ro J, Shanks J, Shen S, Tsuzuki T, Varma M, Wheeler T, Yaxley J, Egevad L.

Pathology. 2019 Aug;51(5):463-473. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 Jul 3. Review.

PMID:
31279442
3.

SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.

Pierconti F, Martini M, Cenci T, Petrone GL, Ricci R, Sacco E, Bassi PF, Larocca LM.

Prostate. 2017 May;77(6):597-603. doi: 10.1002/pros.23299. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

PMID:
28144985
4.

The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.

Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA; Grading Committee.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530. Review.

PMID:
26492179
5.

From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.

Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Yaxley J, Srigley JR, Egevad L.

Scand J Urol. 2016 Oct;50(5):325-9. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1201858. Epub 2016 Jul 14. Review.

PMID:
27415753
6.

International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.

Egevad L, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Samaratunga H.

APMIS. 2016 Jun;124(6):433-5. doi: 10.1111/apm.12533.

PMID:
27150257
7.

Evolution, controversies and the future of prostate cancer grading.

Egevad L, Delahunt B, Yaxley J, Samaratunga H.

Pathol Int. 2019 Feb;69(2):55-66. doi: 10.1111/pin.12761. Epub 2019 Jan 29. Review.

PMID:
30694570
8.

Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.

Gottipati S, Warncke J, Vollmer R, Humphrey PA.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Jun;36(6):900-7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182495dee.

PMID:
22367295
9.

An update of the Gleason grading system.

Epstein JI.

J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.046. Epub 2009 Dec 14. Review.

PMID:
20006878
10.

Prognostic Value of the New Prostate Cancer International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups.

Offermann A, Hohensteiner S, Kuempers C, Ribbat-Idel J, Schneider F, Becker F, Hupe MC, Duensing S, Merseburger AS, Kirfel J, Reischl M, Lubczyk V, Kuefer R, Perner S.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Sep 29;4:157. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00157. eCollection 2017.

11.

Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.

Pierorazio PM, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Epstein JI.

BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):753-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

12.

The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus guidelines on Gleason grading - a matched-pair analysis.

Berg KD, Thomsen FB, Nerstrøm C, Røder MA, Iversen P, Toft BG, Vainer B, Brasso K.

BJU Int. 2016 Jun;117(6):883-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13439. Epub 2016 Feb 22.

13.

Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens: nationwide trends 2000-2012.

Danneman D, Drevin L, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Robinson D, Bratt O, Loeb S, Stattin P, Egevad L.

BJU Int. 2017 Jan;119(1):50-56. doi: 10.1111/bju.13458. Epub 2016 Mar 24.

14.

Implications of the International Society of Urological Pathology modified Gleason grading system.

Egevad L, Mazzucchelli R, Montironi R.

Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2012 Apr;136(4):426-34. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2011-0495-RA. Review.

PMID:
22458905
15.

Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy.

Choy B, Pearce SM, Anderson BB, Shalhav AL, Zagaja G, Eggener SE, Paner GP.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Oct;40(10):1400-6. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000691.

PMID:
27379821
16.

[The 2014 consensus conference of the ISUP on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma].

Kristiansen G, Egevad L, Amin M, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA, Epstein JI; Graduierungskommittee.

Pathologe. 2016 Feb;37(1):17-26. doi: 10.1007/s00292-015-0136-6. German.

PMID:
26809207
17.

Contemporary Gleason grading and novel Grade Groups in clinical practice.

Magi-Galluzzi C, Montironi R, Epstein JI.

Curr Opin Urol. 2016 Sep;26(5):488-92. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000320. Review.

PMID:
27308734
18.

The prognostic significance of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading system for prostate cancer.

Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Gianduzzo T, Coughlin G, Duffy D, LeFevre I, Johannsen S, Egevad L, Yaxley J.

Pathology. 2015 Oct;47(6):515-9. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000315.

PMID:
26325670
19.

The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice.

Zareba P, Zhang J, Yilmaz A, Trpkov K.

Histopathology. 2009 Oct;55(4):384-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03405.x.

PMID:
19817888
20.

Impact on the clinical outcome of prostate cancer by the 2005 international society of urological pathology modified Gleason grading system.

Dong F, Wang C, Farris AB, Wu S, Lee H, Olumi AF, McDougal WS, Young RH, Wu CL.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Jun;36(6):838-43. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182486faf.

PMID:
22592143

Supplemental Content

Support Center