Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 104

1.

Performance and Reading Time of Automated Breast US with or without Computer-aided Detection.

Yang S, Gao X, Liu L, Shu R, Yan J, Zhang G, Xiao Y, Ju Y, Zhao N, Song H.

Radiology. 2019 Jun 18:181816. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181816. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31210612
2.

Decrease in interpretation time for both novice and experienced readers using a concurrent computer-aided detection system for digital breast tomosynthesis.

Chae EY, Kim HH, Jeong JW, Chae SH, Lee S, Choi YW.

Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2518-2525. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5886-0. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

PMID:
30547203
3.

Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).

Balleyguier C, Arfi-Rouche J, Levy L, Toubiana PR, Cohen-Scali F, Toledano AY, Boyer B.

Eur J Radiol. 2017 Dec;97:83-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

PMID:
29153373
4.

Investigation of optimal use of computer-aided detection systems: the role of the "machine" in decision making process.

Paquerault S, Hardy PT, Wersto N, Chen J, Smith RC.

Acad Radiol. 2010 Sep;17(9):1112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 Jun 3.

PMID:
20605489
5.

Accuracy and interpretation time of computer-aided detection among novice and experienced breast MRI readers.

Lehman CD, Blume JD, DeMartini WB, Hylton NM, Herman B, Schnall MD.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jun;200(6):W683-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.11.8394.

6.

Computer-aided detection of lung nodules on multidetector CT in concurrent-reader and second-reader modes: a comparative study.

Matsumoto S, Ohno Y, Aoki T, Yamagata H, Nogami M, Matsumoto K, Yamashita Y, Sugimura K.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Aug;82(8):1332-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.02.005. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

PMID:
23480965
7.

CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.

Taylor SA, Charman SC, Lefere P, McFarland EG, Paulson EK, Yee J, Aslam R, Barlow JM, Gupta A, Kim DH, Miller CM, Halligan S.

Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):463-71. Epub 2007 Dec 19.

PMID:
18094263
8.

1000-Case Reader Study of Radiologists' Performance in Interpretation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images with a Computer-Aided Detection System.

Xu X, Bao L, Tan Y, Zhu L, Kong F, Wang W.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Aug;44(8):1694-1702. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.04.020. Epub 2018 May 28.

PMID:
29853222
9.

Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study.

Halligan S, Mallett S, Altman DG, McQuillan J, Proud M, Beddoe G, Honeyfield L, Taylor SA.

Radiology. 2011 Feb;258(2):469-76. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100354. Epub 2010 Nov 17.

PMID:
21084409
10.

Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.

van Zelst JCM, Tan T, Clauser P, Domingo A, Dorrius MD, Drieling D, Golatta M, Gras F, de Jong M, Pijnappel R, Rutten MJCM, Karssemeijer N, Mann RM.

Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):2996-3006. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5280-3. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

11.

CT colonography: effect of computer-aided detection of colonic polyps as a second and concurrent reader for general radiologists with moderate experience in CT colonography.

Mang T, Bogoni L, Anand VX, Chandra D, Curtin AJ, Lev-Toaff AS, Hermosillo G, Noah R, Raykar V, Salganicoff M, Shaw R, Summerton S, Tappouni RF, Ringel H, Weber M, Wolf M, Obuchowski NA.

Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul;24(7):1466-76. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3158-1. Epub 2014 May 10.

PMID:
24816931
12.

Investigation of reading mode and relative sensitivity as factors that influence reader performance when using computer-aided detection software.

Paquerault S, Samuelson FW, Petrick N, Myers KJ, Smith RC.

Acad Radiol. 2009 Sep;16(9):1095-107. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.03.024. Epub 2009 Jun 11.

PMID:
19523855
13.

Evaluation of the effect of computer-aided classification of benign and malignant lesions on reader performance in automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound.

Tan T, Platel B, Twellmann T, van Schie G, Mus R, Grivegnée A, Mann RM, Karssemeijer N.

Acad Radiol. 2013 Nov;20(11):1381-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.013.

PMID:
24119350
14.

Focal Liver Lesions: Computer-aided Diagnosis by Using Contrast-enhanced US Cine Recordings.

Ta CN, Kono Y, Eghtedari M, Oh YT, Robbin ML, Barr RG, Kummel AC, Mattrey RF.

Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):1062-1071. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170365. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

15.

Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.

Hock D, Ouhadi R, Materne R, Aouchria AS, Mancini I, Broussaud T, Magotteaux P, Nchimi A.

Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):860-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482070895.

PMID:
18710980
16.

Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection.

Rubin GD, Lyo JK, Paik DS, Sherbondy AJ, Chow LC, Leung AN, Mindelzun R, Schraedley-Desmond PK, Zinck SE, Naidich DP, Napel S.

Radiology. 2005 Jan;234(1):274-83. Epub 2004 Nov 10.

PMID:
15537839
17.

Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.

Iussich G, Correale L, Senore C, Hassan C, Segnan N, Campanella D, Bert A, Galatola G, Laudi C, Regge D.

Invest Radiol. 2014 Mar;49(3):173-82. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000009.

18.

Interpretation Time Using a Concurrent-Read Computer-Aided Detection System for Automated Breast Ultrasound in Breast Cancer Screening of Women With Dense Breast Tissue.

Jiang Y, Inciardi MF, Edwards AV, Papaioannou J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Aug;211(2):452-461. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19516. Epub 2018 May 24.

PMID:
29792747
19.

Application of computer-aided diagnosis in breast ultrasound interpretation: improvements in diagnostic performance according to reader experience.

Choi JH, Kang BJ, Baek JE, Lee HS, Kim SH.

Ultrasonography. 2018 Jul;37(3):217-225. doi: 10.14366/usg.17046. Epub 2017 Aug 14.

20.

CT colonography: preliminary assessment of a double-read paradigm that uses computer-aided detection as the first reader.

Iussich G, Correale L, Senore C, Segnan N, Laghi A, Iafrate F, Campanella D, Neri E, Cerri F, Hassan C, Regge D.

Radiology. 2013 Sep;268(3):743-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121192. Epub 2013 Apr 29.

Supplemental Content

Support Center