Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Are Sex Differences in Preferences for Physical Attractiveness and Good Earning Capacity in Potential Mates Smaller in Countries With Greater Gender Equality?

Zhang L, Lee AJ, DeBruine LM, Jones BC.

Evol Psychol. 2019 Apr-Jun;17(2):1474704919852921. doi: 10.1177/1474704919852921.

PMID:
31146580
2.

Mate choice trade-offs and women's preference for physically attractive men.

Waynforth D.

Hum Nat. 2001 Sep;12(3):207-19. doi: 10.1007/s12110-001-1007-9.

PMID:
26192277
3.

Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample.

Sprecher S, Sullivan Q, Hatfield E.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Jun;66(6):1074-80.

PMID:
8046577
4.

Mate preferences do predict attraction and choices in the early stages of mate selection.

Li NP, Yong JC, Tov W, Sng O, Fletcher GJ, Valentine KA, Jiang YF, Balliet D.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Nov;105(5):757-76. doi: 10.1037/a0033777. Epub 2013 Aug 5.

PMID:
23915041
5.

Sex similarities and differences in preferences for short-term mates: what, whether, and why.

Li NP, Kenrick DT.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;90(3):468-89.

PMID:
16594832
7.

Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?

Arnocky S.

Evol Psychol. 2018 Jan-Mar;16(1):1474704918763271. doi: 10.1177/1474704918763271.

PMID:
29534596
8.

Assessment of Long-Term Mate Preferences in Iran.

Atari M.

Evol Psychol. 2017 Apr-Jun;15(2):1474704917702459. doi: 10.1177/1474704917702459.

PMID:
28401792
9.

Which is Better in Fat Times and in Lean Times: the Macho Man vs. the Nice Guy? Priming Effects on Polish and Norwegian Students' Mate Preferences.

Kosakowska-Berezecka N, Besta T.

Curr Psychol. 2018;37(3):568-573. doi: 10.1007/s12144-016-9530-3. Epub 2016 Dec 14.

10.

Individual differences in valuing mates' physical attractiveness.

Mathes EW, Bielser A, Cassell T, Summers S, Witowski A.

Psychol Rep. 2006 Oct;99(2):502-11.

PMID:
17153821
11.

Sex differences in short-term mate preferences and behavioral mimicry: a semi-naturalistic experiment.

van Straaten I, Engels RC, Finkenauer C, Holland RW.

Arch Sex Behav. 2008 Dec;37(6):902-11. Epub 2007 Aug 8.

PMID:
17682936
13.

Effects of partner beauty on opposite-sex attractiveness judgments.

Little AC, Caldwell CA, Jones BC, DeBruine LM.

Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Dec;40(6):1119-27. doi: 10.1007/s10508-011-9806-5.

PMID:
21901646
14.

Sex Differences in Facial and Vocal Attractiveness Among College Students in China.

Hou J, Ye Z.

Front Psychol. 2019 May 22;10:1166. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01166. eCollection 2019.

15.

Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality.

Falk A, Hermle J.

Science. 2018 Oct 19;362(6412). pii: eaas9899. doi: 10.1126/science.aas9899.

PMID:
30337384
16.

Comprehensive view of the human mating process among young couples in isfahan-iran: an explanatory mixed-method study.

Merghati Khoei E, Ziaei T, Salehi M, Farajzadegan Z.

Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Dec;15(12):e10445. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.10445. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

17.

More than just a pretty face and a hot body: multiple cues in mate-choice.

Jonason PK, Raulston T, Rotolo A.

J Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar-Apr;152(2):174-84.

PMID:
22468419
18.

The effects of control of resources on magnitudes of sex differences in human mate preferences.

Moore F, Cassidy C, Perrett DI.

Evol Psychol. 2010 Dec 3;8(4):720-35.

PMID:
22947829
19.

Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?

Eastwick PW, Finkel EJ.

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):245-64. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245.

PMID:
18211175
20.

Big two personality and big three mate preferences: similarity attracts, but country-level mate preferences crucially matter.

Gebauer JE, Leary MR, Neberich W.

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Dec;38(12):1579-93. doi: 10.1177/0146167212456300. Epub 2012 Sep 5.

PMID:
22956293

Supplemental Content

Support Center