Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 103

1.

Prediction of image noise contributions in proton computed tomography and comparison to measurements.

Dickmann J, Wesp P, Rädler M, Rit S, Pankuch M, Johnson RP, Bashkirov V, Schulte RW, Parodi K, Landry G, Dedes G.

Phys Med Biol. 2019 Jul 16;64(14):145016. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2474.

PMID:
31125986
2.

Experimental fluence-modulated proton computed tomography by pencil beam scanning.

Dedes G, Johnson RP, Pankuch M, Detrich N, Pols WMA, Rit S, Schulte RW, Parodi K, Landry G.

Med Phys. 2018 Jul;45(7):3287-3296. doi: 10.1002/mp.12989. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

3.

Application of fluence field modulation to proton computed tomography for proton therapy imaging.

Dedes G, De Angelis L, Rit S, Hansen D, Belka C, Bashkirov V, Johnson RP, Coutrakon G, Schubert KE, Schulte RW, Parodi K, Landry G.

Phys Med Biol. 2017 Jul 12;62(15):6026-6043. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa7734.

4.

The effect of beam purity and scanner complexity on proton CT accuracy.

Piersimoni P, Ramos-Méndez J, Geoghegan T, Bashkirov VA, Schulte RW, Faddegon BA.

Med Phys. 2017 Jan;44(1):284-298. doi: 10.1002/mp.12013. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

5.

Helium CT: Monte Carlo simulation results for an ideal source and detector with comparison to proton CT.

Piersimoni P, Faddegon BA, Méndez JR, Schulte RW, Volz L, Seco J.

Med Phys. 2018 Jul;45(7):3264-3274. doi: 10.1002/mp.12942. Epub 2018 May 20.

PMID:
29727481
6.

Two-dimensional noise reconstruction in proton computed tomography using distance-driven filtered back-projection of simulated projections.

Rädler M, Landry G, Rit S, Schulte RW, Parodi K, Dedes G.

Phys Med Biol. 2018 Oct 24;63(21):215009. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae5c9.

PMID:
30277469
7.

Fluence field optimization for noise and dose objectives in CT.

Bartolac S, Graham S, Siewerdsen J, Jaffray D.

Med Phys. 2011 Jul;38 Suppl 1:S2. doi: 10.1118/1.3574885.

PMID:
21978114
8.

A two-step algorithm for predicting portal dose images in arbitrary detectors.

McCurdy BM, Pistorius S.

Med Phys. 2000 Sep;27(9):2109-16.

PMID:
11011740
9.

Validation of a Monte Carlo model used for simulating tube current modulation in computed tomography over a wide range of phantom conditions/challenges.

Bostani M, McMillan K, DeMarco JJ, Cagnon CH, McNitt-Gray MF.

Med Phys. 2014 Nov;41(11):112101. doi: 10.1118/1.4887807.

PMID:
25370652
10.

Experimental realization of fluence field modulated CT using digital beam attenuation.

Szczykutowicz TP, Mistretta CA.

Phys Med Biol. 2014 Mar 7;59(5):1305-26. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/5/1305. Epub 2014 Feb 20.

11.

Evaluation of detector readout gain mode and bowtie filters for cone-beam CT imaging of the head.

Xu J, Sisniega A, Zbijewski W, Dang H, Stayman JW, Wang X, Foos DH, Aygun N, Koliatsos VE, Siewerdsen JH.

Phys Med Biol. 2016 Aug 21;61(16):5973-92. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/16/5973. Epub 2016 Jul 20.

PMID:
27435162
12.

An evaluation of spatial resolution of a prototype proton CT scanner.

Plautz TE, Bashkirov V, Giacometti V, Hurley RF, Johnson RP, Piersimoni P, Sadrozinski HF, Schulte RW, Zatserklyaniy A.

Med Phys. 2016 Dec;43(12):6291.

13.

Software platform for simulation of a prototype proton CT scanner.

Giacometti V, Bashkirov VA, Piersimoni P, Guatelli S, Plautz TE, Sadrozinski HF, Johnson RP, Zatserklyaniy A, Tessonnier T, Parodi K, Rosenfeld AB, Schulte RW.

Med Phys. 2017 Mar;44(3):1002-1016. doi: 10.1002/mp.12107.

PMID:
28094862
14.

Rapid Monte Carlo simulation of detector DQE(f).

Star-Lack J, Sun M, Meyer A, Morf D, Constantin D, Fahrig R, Abel E.

Med Phys. 2014 Mar;41(3):031916. doi: 10.1118/1.4865761.

15.

Simulated scatter performance of an inverse-geometry dedicated breast CT system.

Bhagtani R, Schmidt TG.

Med Phys. 2009 Mar;36(3):788-96.

PMID:
19378739
16.

SU-F-BRCD-07: Experimental Validation of Fluence Field Modulation for Noise and Dose Management in CT.

Bartolac S, Jaffray D.

Med Phys. 2012 Jun;39(6Part20):3857. doi: 10.1118/1.4735745.

PMID:
28517545
17.

Monte Carlo implementation, validation, and characterization of a 120 leaf MLC.

Fix MK, Volken W, Frei D, Frauchiger D, Born EJ, Manser P.

Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5311-20. doi: 10.1118/1.3626485.

PMID:
21992349
18.

A measurement-based X-ray source model characterization for CT dosimetry computations.

Sommerville M, Poirier Y, Tambasco M.

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Nov 8;16(6):386-400. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5231.

19.

Compensator models for fluence field modulated computed tomography.

Bartolac S, Jaffray D.

Med Phys. 2013 Dec;40(12):121909. doi: 10.1118/1.4829513.

PMID:
24320520
20.

Experimental comparison of proton CT and dual energy x-ray CT for relative stopping power estimation in proton therapy.

Dedes G, Dickmann J, Niepel K, Wesp P, Johnson RP, Pankuch M, Bashkirov V, Rit S, Volz L, Schulte RW, Landry G, Parodi K.

Phys Med Biol. 2019 Aug 14;64(16):165002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab2b72.

PMID:
31220814

Supplemental Content

Support Center