Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Establishment of Novel Intraoperative Monitoring and Mapping Method for the Cavernous Nerve During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results of the Phase I/II, First-in-human, Feasibility Study.

Song WH, Park JH, Tae BS, Kim SM, Hur M, Seo JH, Ku JH, Kwak C, Kim HH, Kim K, Jeong CW.

Eur Urol. 2019 May 15. pii: S0302-2838(19)30359-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.042. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31103393
2.

Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.

de Carvalho PA, Barbosa JABA, Guglielmetti GB, Cordeiro MD, Rocco B, Nahas WC, Patel V, Coelho RF.

Eur Urol. 2018 Jul 21. pii: S0302-2838(18)30481-0. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.003. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30041833
3.

Exploratory Decision-Tree Modeling of Data from the Randomized REACTT Trial of Tadalafil Versus Placebo to Predict Recovery of Erectile Function After Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.

Montorsi F, Oelke M, Henneges C, Brock G, Salonia A, d'Anzeo G, Rossi A, Mulhall JP, Büttner H.

Eur Urol. 2016 Sep;70(3):529-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.036. Epub 2016 Mar 3.

4.

Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.

Kowalczyk KJ, Huang AC, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Yu HY, Ulmer WD, Kaplan JR, Patel S, Nguyen PL, Hu JC.

Eur Urol. 2011 Sep;60(3):536-47. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 May 17.

PMID:
21620561
5.

Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Miyake H, Miyazaki A, Yao A, Hinata N, Fujisawa M.

J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):221-6. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0571-2. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

PMID:
26994775
6.

Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.

Sooriakumaran P, Pini G, Nyberg T, Derogar M, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, Steineck G, Wiklund PN.

Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):618-627. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

PMID:
28882327
7.

Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial.

Student V Jr, Vidlar A, Grepl M, Hartmann I, Buresova E, Student V.

Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):822-830. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

PMID:
27283216
8.

A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

KleinJan GH, Sikorska K, Korne CM, Brouwer OR, Buckle T, Tillier C, van der Roest RCM, de Jong J, van Leeuwen FWB, van der Poel HG.

J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):455-462. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0867-5. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

PMID:
30178300
9.

Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Huang MW, Robinson BD, Shevchuk MM, Durand M, Sooriakumaran P, Grover S, Yadav R, Mishra N, Mohan S, Brooks DC, Shaikh N, Khanna A, Leung R.

BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(6 Pt 2):984-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10565.x.

10.

Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with ≥ 1 year of follow-up.

Galfano A, Di Trapani D, Sozzi F, Strada E, Petralia G, Bramerio M, Ascione A, Gambacorta M, Bocciardi AM.

Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):974-80. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.06.046. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

PMID:
23856036
11.

A randomized phase 3 study of intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation with penile tumescence monitoring to improve nerve sparing during radical prostatectomy.

Klotz L, Heaton J, Jewett M, Chin J, Fleshner N, Goldenberg L, Gleave M.

J Urol. 2000 Nov;164(5):1573-8.

PMID:
11025707
12.

Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Herlemann A, Cowan JE, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR.

Eur Urol. 2018 Feb;73(2):215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.027. Epub 2017 May 9.

PMID:
28499617
13.

Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.

Ludovico GM, Dachille G, Pagliarulo G, D'Elia C, Mondaini N, Gacci M, Detti B, Malossini G, Bartoletti R, Cai T.

Oncol Rep. 2013 Jun;29(6):2445-50. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2365. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

PMID:
23545628
14.

Five-year Outcomes for a Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Bertolo R, Manfredi M, Mele F, Checcucci E, De Luca S, Passera R, Scarpa RM.

Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Jan;4(1):80-86. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

PMID:
28753822
15.

Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Kumar A, Tandon S, Samavedi S, Mouraviev V, Bates AS, Patel VR.

J Robot Surg. 2016 Sep;10(3):187-200. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0607-7. Epub 2016 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
27251473
16.

Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Kumar A, Samavedi S, Bates AS, Mouraviev V, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel VR.

J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):129-138. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0627-3. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

PMID:
27435701
17.

Recovery of erectile function after radical prostatectomy is quantitatively related to the response to intraoperative cavernous nerve stimulation.

Rabbani F, Patel M, Cozzi P, Mulhall JP, Scardino PT.

BJU Int. 2009 Nov;104(9):1252-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08519.x. Epub 2009 Mar 30.

18.

Early Catheter Removal after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Outcomes for the Aalst Technique (ECaRemA Study).

Gratzke C, Dovey Z, Novara G, Geurts N, De Groote R, Schatteman P, de Naeyer G, Gandaglia G, Mottrie A.

Eur Urol. 2016 May;69(5):917-23. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.052. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

PMID:
26578444
19.

Total Anatomical Reconstruction During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications on Early Recovery of Urinary Continence.

Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Manfredi M, De Luca S, Checcucci E, Morra I, Passera R, Fiori C.

Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):485-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Aug 19.

20.

Use of a hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier on the neurovascular bundle and prostatic bed to facilitate earlier recovery of erectile function after robot-assisted prostatectomy: an initial experience.

Joung JY, Ha YS, Singer EA, Ercolani MC, Favaretto RL, Lee DH, Kim WJ, Lee KH, Kim IY.

J Endourol. 2013 Oct;27(10):1230-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0345. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

Supplemental Content

Support Center