Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 96

1.

Stability After Initial Decline in Coronary Revascularization Rates in the United States.

Raza S, Deo SV, Kalra A, Zia A, Altarabsheh SE, Deo VS, Mustafa RR, Younes A, Rao SV, Markowitz AH, Park SJ, Costa MA, Simon DI, Bhatt DL, Sabik JF 3rd.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Apr 27. pii: S0003-4975(19)30596-X. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.080. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31039350
2.

Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008.

Epstein AJ, Polsky D, Yang F, Yang L, Groeneveld PW.

JAMA. 2011 May 4;305(17):1769-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.551.

3.

Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.

Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J, Ahn JM, Boersma E, Christiansen EH, Domanski MJ, Farkouh ME, Flather M, Fuster V, Hlatky MA, Holm NR, Hueb WA, Kamalesh M, Kim YH, Mäkikallio T, Mohr FW, Papageorgiou G, Park SJ, Rodriguez AE, Sabik JF 3rd, Stables RH, Stone GW, Serruys PW, Kappetein AP.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.

4.

Current status and outcomes of coronary revascularization 1999 to 2002: 148,396 surgical and percutaneous procedures.

Mack MJ, Brown PP, Kugelmass AD, Battaglia SL, Tarkington LG, Simon AW, Culler SD, Becker ER.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Mar;77(3):761-6; discussion 766-8.

PMID:
14992867
5.

Trends in the use of diagnostic coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass graft surgery across North Carolina.

Jones WS, Patel MR, Holleran SA, Harrison JK, O'Connor CM, Phillips HR 3rd.

Am Heart J. 2011 Nov;162(5):932-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.08.015. Epub 2011 Oct 6.

PMID:
22093211
6.

Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial.

Head SJ, Davierwala PM, Serruys PW, Redwood SR, Colombo A, Mack MJ, Morice MC, Holmes DR Jr, Feldman TE, Ståhle E, Underwood P, Dawkins KD, Kappetein AP, Mohr FW.

Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 21;35(40):2821-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213. Epub 2014 May 21.

PMID:
24849105
7.

A comparison of outcomes between percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass surgery in octogenarian patients.

Wongcharoenkiat N, Tresukosol D, Laksanabunsong P, Udompunturak S.

J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Feb;95 Suppl 2:S154-64.

PMID:
22574545
8.

Incidence, Characteristics, Predictors, and Outcomes of Repeat Revascularization After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: The SYNTAX Trial at 5 Years.

Parasca CA, Head SJ, Milojevic M, Mack MJ, Serruys PW, Morice MC, Mohr FW, Feldman TE, Colombo A, Dawkins KD, Holmes DR Jr, Kappetein PA; SYNTAX Investigators.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Dec 26;9(24):2493-2507. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.044.

9.

Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting for left main revascularization: an updated meta-analysis.

Bajaj NS, Patel N, Kalra R, Marogil P, Bhardwaj A, Arora G, Arora P.

Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2017 Jul 1;3(3):173-182. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx008. Review.

10.

[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].

Yang BG, Yu XP, Chen F, Lyu SZ, Li Q, He JQ, Yuan F.

Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005. Chinese.

PMID:
28100341
11.

Revascularization Trends in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get with the Guidelines (NCDR ACTION Registry-GWTG).

Pandey A, McGuire DK, de Lemos JA, Das SR, Berry JD, Brilakis ES, Banerjee S, Marso SP, Barsness GW, Simon DN, Roe M, Goyal A, Kosiborod M, Amsterdam EA, Kumbhani DJ.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):197-205. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002084. Epub 2016 May 10.

PMID:
27166210
12.

Treatment Strategies for Women With Coronary Artery Disease [Internet].

Dolor RJ, Melloni C, Chatterjee R, Allen LaPointe NM, Williams JB Jr, Coeytaux RR, McBroom AJ, Musty MD, Wing L, Samsa GP, Patel MR.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Aug.

13.

Incidence and outcome of surgical procedures after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with those after percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Coronary Revascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2.

Tokushige A, Shiomi H, Morimoto T, Ono K, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Kadota K, Ando K, Shizuta S, Tada T, Tazaki J, Kato Y, Hayano M, Abe M, Hamasaki S, Ohishi M, Nakashima H, Mitsudo K, Nobuyoshi M, Kita T, Imoto Y, Sakata R, Okabayashi H, Hanyu M, Shimamoto M, Nishiwaki N, Komiya T, Kimura T; CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort-2 Investigators.

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Aug;7(4):482-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.001056. Epub 2014 Jul 29.

PMID:
25074253
14.

Coronary revascularization in Japan. Part 1: survey of facilities during 1997.

Shihara M, Tsutsui H, Tsuchihashi M, Shigematsu H, Yamamoto S, Koike G, Kono S, Takeshita A; Japanese Coronary Intervention Study (JCIS) Group.

Jpn Circ J. 2001 Dec;65(12):1005-10.

16.

[Efficacy comparison of 3 strategies for real-world stable coronary artery disease patients with three-vessel disease].

Liu R, Jiang L, Xu LJ, Tian J, Zhao XY, Zhang Y, Xu JJ, Song Y, Wang HH, Gao Z, Song L, Yuan JQ.

Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 24;45(12):1049-1057. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.12.009. Chinese.

PMID:
29325365
17.

Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with 3-vessel or left main coronary artery disease: final results from the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial.

Cohen DJ, Osnabrugge RL, Magnuson EA, Wang K, Li H, Chinnakondepalli K, Pinto D, Abdallah MS, Vilain KA, Morice MC, Dawkins KD, Kappetein AP, Mohr FW, Serruys PW; SYNTAX Trial Investigators.

Circulation. 2014 Sep 30;130(14):1146-57. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009985. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

PMID:
25085960
18.

The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Study: 5-year follow-up of revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease.

Kapur A, Bartolini D, Finlay MC, Qureshi AC, Flather M, Strange JW, Hall RJ.

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010 Jan;11(1):26-33. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e328330ea32.

PMID:
19797974
19.

Comparison of coronary revascularization procedures in octogenarians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

McKellar SH, Brown ML, Frye RL, Schaff HV, Sundt TM 3rd.

Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Nov;5(11):738-46. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1348. Epub 2008 Sep 30. Review.

PMID:
18825133
20.

National trends in utilization and outcomes of coronary revascularization procedures among people with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain (2001-2011).

Lopez-de-Andres A, Jimenez-García R, Hernandez-Barrera V, Perez-Farinos N, de Miguel-Yanes JM, Mendez-Bailon M, Jimenez-Trujillo I, de Miguel AG, Pino CG, Carrasco-Garrido P.

Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Jan 3;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-3.

Supplemental Content

Support Center