Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

A motor-driven adjustable prosthetic socket operated using a mobile phone app: A technical note.

Sanders JE, Garbini JL, McLean JB, Hinrichs P, Predmore TJ, Brzostowski JT, Redd CB, Cagle JC.

Med Eng Phys. 2019 Jun;68:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

PMID:
31028009
2.

Socket size adjustments in people with transtibial amputation: Effects on residual limb fluid volume and limb-socket distance.

McLean JB, Redd CB, Larsen BG, Garbini JL, Brzostowski JT, Hafner BJ, Sanders JE.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2019 Mar;63:161-171. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.02.022. Epub 2019 Mar 2.

PMID:
30901641
3.

How do transtibial residual limbs adjust to intermittent incremental socket volume changes?

Larsen BG, McLean JB, Allyn KJ, Brzostowski JT, Garbini JL, Sanders JE.

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Oct;43(5):528-539. doi: 10.1177/0309364619864771. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

PMID:
31339448
4.

Adjustable sockets may improve residual limb fluid volume retention in transtibial prosthesis users.

Brzostowski JT, Larsen BG, Youngblood RT, Ciol MA, Hafner BJ, Gurrey CJ, McLean JB, Allyn KJ, Sanders JE.

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Jun;43(3):250-256. doi: 10.1177/0309364618820140. Epub 2019 Jan 10.

PMID:
30628522
5.

Effects of socket size on metrics of socket fit in trans-tibial prosthesis users.

Sanders JE, Youngblood RT, Hafner BJ, Cagle JC, McLean JB, Redd CB, Dietrich CR, Ciol MA, Allyn KJ.

Med Eng Phys. 2017 Jun;44:32-43. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.03.003. Epub 2017 Apr 1.

6.

Development and acceptability testing of decision trees for self-management of prosthetic socket fit in adults with lower limb amputation.

Lee DJ, Veneri DA.

Disabil Rehabil. 2018 May;40(9):1066-1071. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1286694. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

PMID:
28637137
7.

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN ADJUSTABLE TRANSFEMORAL PROSTHETIC INTERFACE ACCOMMODATING VOLUME FLUCTUATION: CASE STUDY.

Kahle JT, Klenow TD, Highsmith MJ.

Technol Innov. 2016 Sep;18(2-3):175-183. doi: 10.21300/18.2-3.2016.175.

8.

Effects of long-distance walking on socket-limb interface pressure, tactile sensitivity and subjective perceptions of trans-tibial amputees.

Yeung LF, Leung AK, Zhang M, Lee WC.

Disabil Rehabil. 2013 Jun;35(11):888-93. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.712197. Epub 2012 Sep 20.

PMID:
22992201
9.

Designing an Adaptive Prosthetic Socket Controller Using H-Infinity Loop Shaping Synthesis.

Nguyen H, Shallal C, Thakor N.

IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2019 Jun;2019:1266-1271. doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2019.8779413.

PMID:
31374803
10.

Engineering a trans-tibial prosthetic socket for the lower limb amputee.

Laing S, Lee PV, Goh JCh.

Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2011 May;40(5):252-9. Review.

11.

An Inductive Sensing System to Measure In-Socket Residual Limb Displacements for People Using Lower-Limb Prostheses.

Henrikson KM, Weathersby EJ, Larsen BG, Cagle JC, McLean JB, Sanders JE.

Sensors (Basel). 2018 Nov 9;18(11). pii: E3840. doi: 10.3390/s18113840.

12.

Static and dynamic pressure prediction for prosthetic socket fitting assessment utilising an inverse problem approach.

Sewell P, Noroozi S, Vinney J, Amali R, Andrews S.

Artif Intell Med. 2012 Jan;54(1):29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

PMID:
21963113
13.

A new method to quantify liner deformation within a prosthetic socket for below knee amputees.

Lenz AL, Johnson KA, Bush TR.

J Biomech. 2018 Jun 6;74:213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 13.

PMID:
29678418
14.

Computer-socket manufacturing error: how much before it is clinically apparent?

Sanders JE, Severance MR, Allyn KJ.

J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(4):567-82.

15.

Effect of alignment perturbations in a trans-tibial prosthesis user: A pilot study.

Courtney A, Orendurff MS, Buis A.

J Rehabil Med. 2016 Apr;48(4):396-401. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2075.

16.

Fabrication and application of an adjustable myoelectric transhumeral prosthetic socket.

Schofield JS, Schoepp KR, Stobbe M, Marasco PD, Hebert JS.

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2019 Oct;43(5):564-567. doi: 10.1177/0309364619836353. Epub 2019 Mar 29.

PMID:
30922181
17.

Laboratory and clinical tests of a prototype pressure sensor for clincial assessment of prosthetic socket fit.

Polliack AA, Craig DD, Sieh RC, Landsberger S, Mcneal DR.

Prosthet Orthot Int. 2002 Apr;26(1):23-34.

PMID:
12043923
18.

Progress Toward Optimizing Prosthetic Socket Fit and Suspension Using Elevated Vacuum to Promote Residual Limb Health.

Wernke MM, Schroeder RM, Haynes ML, Nolt LL, Albury AW, Colvin JM.

Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2017 Jul 1;6(7):233-239. doi: 10.1089/wound.2016.0719.

19.

Instrumented socket inserts for sensing interaction at the limb-socket interface.

Swanson EC, McLean JB, Allyn KJ, Redd CB, Sanders JE.

Med Eng Phys. 2018 Jan;51:111-118. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 8.

20.

Development of a residuum/socket interface simulator for lower limb prosthetics.

McGrath MP, Gao J, Tang J, Laszczak P, Jiang L, Bader D, Moser D, Zahedi S.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2017 Mar;231(3):235-242. doi: 10.1177/0954411917690764. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

PMID:
28164748

Supplemental Content

Support Center