Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Use of the Corail stem for revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of clinical outcomes and cost

Wood TJ, Alzahrani M, Marsh JD, Somerville LE, Vasarhelyi EM, Lanting BA.

Can J Surg. 2019 Apr 1;62(2):78-82.

2.

Use of the Corail stem for revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of clinical outcomes and cost

Wood TJ, Alzahrani M, Marsh `D, Somerville LE, Vasarhelyi EM, Lanting BA.

Can J Surg. 2019 Apr 1;62(2):78-82.

3.

Comparative outcomes between collared versus collarless and short versus long stem of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and indirect meta-analysis.

Panichkul P, Bavonratanavech S, Arirachakaran A, Kongtharvonskul J.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jul 30. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02516-1. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31363848
4.

Comparative outcomes and cost-utility following surgical treatment of focal lumbar spinal stenosis compared with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: part 2--estimated lifetime incremental cost-utility ratios.

Rampersaud YR, Tso P, Walker KR, Lewis SJ, Davey JR, Mahomed NN, Coyte PC.

Spine J. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Nov 12.

PMID:
24239803
5.

Long-term survivorship of the Corail™ standard stem.

Louboutin L, Viste A, Desmarchelier R, Fessy MH.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Nov;103(7):987-992. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Aug 1.

6.

Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.

Ancelin D, Reina N, Cavaignac E, Delclaux S, Chiron P.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Dec;102(8):1029-1034. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

7.

Comparison of periprosthetic bone remodeling after implantation of anatomic and tapered cementless femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective cohort study protocol.

Wu XD, Chen Y, Wang ZY, Li YJ, Zhu ZL, Tao YZ, Chen H, Cheng Q, Huang W.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12560. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012560.

8.

Revision Hip Arthroscopy After Labral Reconstruction Using Iliotibial Band Autograft: Surgical Findings and Comparison of Outcomes With Labral Reconstructions Not Requiring Revision.

Locks R, Bolia IK, Utsunomiya H, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ.

Arthroscopy. 2018 Apr;34(4):1244-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.054. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

PMID:
29456067
9.

Outcomes of Nonoperative Management, Iliopsoas Tenotomy, and Revision Arthroplasty for Iliopsoas Impingement after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Shapira J, Chen SL, Wojnowski NM, Lall AC, Rosinsky PJ, Maldonado DR, Domb BG.

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Sep;34(9):2184-2191. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.067. Epub 2019 May 8.

PMID:
31147246
10.

Advantages in Using Cemented Polished Tapered Stems When Performing Total Hip Arthroplasty in Very Young Patients.

Costi K, Solomon LB, McGee MA, Rickman MS, Howie DW.

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1227-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.031. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

PMID:
28082045
11.

What Is the Risk of Revision Surgery in Hydroxyapatite-coated Femoral Hip Stems? Findings From a Large National Registry.

Inacio MC, Lorimer M, Davidson DC, De Steiger RN, Lewis PL, Graves SE.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Dec;476(12):2353-2366. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000513.

PMID:
30303878
12.

Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity.

Lübbeke A, Katz JN, Perneger TV, Hoffmeyer P.

J Rheumatol. 2007 Feb;34(2):394-400. Epub 2006 Nov 15.

PMID:
17143967
13.

Clinical Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Prospective Survival Analysis of Primary and Revision Surgeries in a Large Mixed Cohort.

Domb BG, Gui C, Hutchinson MR, Nho SJ, Terry MA, Lodhia P.

Am J Sports Med. 2016 Oct;44(10):2505-2517. Epub 2016 Sep 2.

PMID:
27590174
14.
15.

Short-Term Outcomes and Complications After Rejuvenate Modular Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision.

Barlow BT, Boles JW, Lee YY, Ortiz PA, Westrich GH.

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Apr;31(4):857-62. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.041. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

PMID:
26777570
16.

Acetabular Labral Reconstruction: Development of a Tool to Predict Outcomes.

Lebus GF, Briggs KK, Dornan GJ, McNamara S, Philippon MJ.

Am J Sports Med. 2018 Nov;46(13):3119-3126. doi: 10.1177/0363546518796838. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

PMID:
30285463
17.

Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.

Tanzer M, Graves SE, Peng A, Shimmin AJ.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jul;476(7):1428-1437. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000533621.57561.a4.

18.

Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Contemporary Triple-Tapered Titanium Stem.

Carlson SW, Goetz DD, Liu SS, Greiner JJ, Callaghan JJ.

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Oct;31(10):2231-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.037. Epub 2016 May 11. Erratum in: J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1408.

PMID:
27339824
19.

Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Hailer NP, Garellick G, Kärrholm J.

Acta Orthop. 2010 Feb;81(1):34-41. doi: 10.3109/17453671003685400.

20.

Midterm results of surgical hip dislocation for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.

Naal FD, Miozzari HH, Schär M, Hesper T, Nötzli HP.

Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1501-10. doi: 10.1177/0363546512445884. Epub 2012 May 3.

PMID:
22556199

Supplemental Content

Support Center