Similar articles for PMID: 30887204

Year	Number of Results
1990	1
1991	1
1992	1
1995	1
1996	2
1999	2
2000	1
2002	2
2003	5
2004	1
2005	4
2006	2
2007	3
2008	4
2009	2
2010	3
2011	11
2012	4
2013	6
2014	6
2015	9
2016	9
2017	6
2018	9
2019	11
2020	7
2021	11
2022	9
2023	1
2024	0

1

Annual mammography at age 45-49 years and biennial mammography at age 50-69 years: comparing performance measures in an organised screening setting.

Bucchi L, Ravaioli A, Baldacchini F, Giuliani O, Mancini S, Vattiato R, Falcini F, Giorgi Rossi P, Campari C, Canuti D, Di Felice E, Sassoli de Bianchi P, Ferretti S, Bertozzi N; Emilia-Romagna Region Workgroup for Mammography Screening Evaluation. Bucchi L, et al. Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5517-5527. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06050-w. Epub 2019 Mar 18. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30887204

2

Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.

van Luijt PA, Fracheboud J, Heijnsdijk EA, den Heeten GJ, de Koning HJ; National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening in Netherlands Study Group (NETB). van Luijt PA, et al. Eur J Cancer. 2013 Nov;49(16):3517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 17. Eur J Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23871248 Free article.

3

Breast Tumor Prognostic Characteristics and Biennial vs Annual Mammography, Age, and Menopausal Status.

Miglioretti DL, Zhu W, Kerlikowske K, Sprague BL, Onega T, Buist DS, Henderson LM, Smith RA; Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Miglioretti DL, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1069-77. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3084. JAMA Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26501844 Free PMC article.

4

Breast Cancer Screening With Mammography Plus Ultrasonography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women 50 Years or Younger at Diagnosis and Treated With Breast Conservation Therapy.

Cho N, Han W, Han BK, Bae MS, Ko ES, Nam SJ, Chae EY, Lee JW, Kim SH, Kang BJ, Song BJ, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Kim SI, Kim SM, Kang E, Choi Y, Kim HH, Moon WK. Cho N, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2017 Nov 1;3(11):1495-1502. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1256. JAMA Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28655029 Free PMC article.

5

Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.

Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, Caumo F, Pellegrini M, Brunelli S, Tuttobene P, Bricolo P, Fantò C, Valentini M, Montemezzi S, Macaskill P. Ciatto S, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):583-9. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70134-7. Epub 2013 Apr 25. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23623721

6

Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study.

Bernardi D, Macaskill P, Pellegrini M, Valentini M, Fantò C, Ostillio L, Tuttobene P, Luparia A, Houssami N. Bernardi D, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1105-1113. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30101-2. Epub 2016 Jun 23. Lancet Oncol. 2016. PMID: 27345635

7

Screening outcome and surgical treatment during and after the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography in the south of The Netherlands.

Weber RJ, Nederend J, Voogd AC, Strobbe LJ, Duijm LE. Weber RJ, et al. Int J Cancer. 2015 Jul 1;137(1):135-43. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29354. Epub 2014 Dec 10. Int J Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25418512 Free article.

8

Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Results After 10 Years of Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography.

Ho TH, Bissell MCS, Kerlikowske K, Hubbard RA, Sprague BL, Lee CI, Tice JA, Tosteson ANA, Miglioretti DL. Ho TH, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222440. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2440. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35333365 Free PMC article.

9

Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI, Yankaskas BC, Zhu W, Miglioretti DL. Hubbard RA, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):481-92. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00004. Ann Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 22007042 Free PMC article.

10

Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom.

Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Blanks R, Ballard-Barbash R, Bobo JK, Lee NC, Wallis MG, Patnick J, Kerlikowske K. Smith-Bindman R, et al. JAMA. 2003 Oct 22;290(16):2129-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.16.2129. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 14570948

Save citations to file

Email citations

Send citations to clipboard

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Create a file for external citation management software

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

117 results

Results by year