Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention following Placement of Sutureless Aortic Bioprostheses.

Kaur K, Cisneros M, Nathan S, Blair JEA, Balkhy HH.

Innovations (Phila). 2019 Apr;14(2):177-182. doi: 10.1177/1556984519836841. Epub 2019 Mar 18.

PMID:
30885090
2.

Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Single Technology Assessment of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve [Internet].

Desser AS, Arentz-Hansen H, Fagerlund BF, Harboe I, Lauvrak V.

Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25.

3.

Concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve replacement: safe and feasible replacement alternative approaches in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease.

Salhab KF, Al Kindi AH, Lane JH, Knudson KE, Kapadia S, Roselli EE, Tuzcu ME, Svensson LG.

J Card Surg. 2013 Sep;28(5):481-3. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12176. Epub 2013 Jul 21.

PMID:
23869423
4.

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with a sutureless valve through a right anterior mini-thoracotomy versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation in high-risk patients.

Miceli A, Gilmanov D, Murzi M, Marchi F, Ferrarini M, Cerillo AG, Quaini E, Solinas M, Berti S, Glauber M.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;49(3):960-5. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv210. Epub 2015 Jun 25.

PMID:
26113005
5.

Aortic Valve Replacement with a Conventional Stented Bioprosthesis versus Sutureless Bioprosthesis: a Study of 763 Patients.

Mujtaba SS, Ledingham SM, Shah AR, Pillay T, Schueler S, Clark S.

Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Mar-Apr;33(2):122-128. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0088.

6.

Sutureless replacement versus transcatheter valve implantation in aortic valve stenosis: a propensity-matched analysis of 2 strategies in high-risk patients.

Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Jessl J, Dell'Aquila AM, Pollari F, Pauschinger M, Fischlein T.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Feb;147(2):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.10.025. Epub 2013 Nov 23.

7.

Sutureless Valve Implantation via Mini J-Sternotomy: A Single Center Experience with 2 Years Mean Follow-up.

Fischlein T, Pfeiffer S, Pollari F, Sirch J, Vogt F, Santarpino G.

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;63(6):467-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1554043. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

PMID:
26177222
8.

Outcomes of a hybrid approach of percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement.

Santana O, Xydas S, Williams RF, LaPietra A, Mawad M, Rosen GP, Beohar N, Mihos CG.

J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jun;9(Suppl 7):S569-S574. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.04.28.

9.
10.

Sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Di Eusanio M, Phan K.

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;4(2):123-30. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.02.06. Review.

11.

Sutureless versus Stented Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The Randomized PERSIST-AVR Study Design.

Lorusso R, Folliguet T, Shrestha M, Meuris B, Kappetein AP, Roselli E, Klersy C, Nozza M, Verhees L, Larracas C, Goisis G, Fischlein T.

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov 29. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675847. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30497085
12.

Feasibility of hybrid off pump artery bypass grafting and transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A case series.

Manoly I, Hasan R, Brazier A, Farooq V, Thompson T, Karunaratne D, Naylor H, Fraser D.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 1;89(7):1273-1279. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26610. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

PMID:
27404373
13.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in degenerative sutureless perceval aortic bioprosthesis.

Landes U, Sagie A, Kornowski R.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 1;91(5):1000-1004. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26576. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

PMID:
27696650
14.

Treatment of a degenerated sutureless Sorin Perceval® valve using an Edwards SAPIEN 3.

Mangner N, Holzhey D, Misfeld M, Linke A.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018 Feb 1;26(2):364-366. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx338.

PMID:
29049819
15.

Effectiveness of same day percutaneous coronary intervention followed by minimally invasive aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis and moderate coronary disease ("hybrid approach").

Brinster DR, Byrne M, Rogers CD, Baim DS, Simon DI, Couper GS, Cohn LH.

Am J Cardiol. 2006 Dec 1;98(11):1501-3. Epub 2006 Oct 13.

PMID:
17126658
16.
17.

Treating the patients in the 'grey-zone' with aortic valve disease: a comparison among conventional surgery, sutureless valves and transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Muneretto C, Bisleri G, Moggi A, Di Bacco L, Tespili M, Repossini A, Rambaldini M.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;20(1):90-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu340. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

PMID:
25320140
18.

Early and intermediate outcome after aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: Results of a multicenter study.

Rubino AS, Santarpino G, De Praetere H, Kasama K, Dalén M, Sartipy U, Lahtinen J, Heikkinen J, Deste W, Pollari F, Svenarud P, Meuris B, Fischlein T, Mignosa C, Biancari F.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;148(3):865-71; discussion 871. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.052. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

19.

A comparison of conventional surgery, transcatheter aortic valve replacement, and sutureless valves in "real-world" patients with aortic stenosis and intermediate- to high-risk profile.

Muneretto C, Alfieri O, Cesana BM, Bisleri G, De Bonis M, Di Bartolomeo R, Savini C, Folesani G, Di Bacco L, Rambaldini M, Maureira JP, Laborde F, Tespili M, Repossini A, Folliguet T.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;150(6):1570-7; discussion 1577-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Aug 24.

20.

Staged High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Impella Support after On-Pump Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Arora S, Bahekar AA.

Tex Heart Inst J. 2016 Oct 1;43(5):423-427. eCollection 2016 Oct. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center