Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 92

1.

Breaking voice identity perception: Expressive voices are more confusable for listeners.

Lavan N, Burston LF, Ladwa P, Merriman SE, Knight S, McGettigan C.

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Sep;72(9):2240-2248. doi: 10.1177/1747021819836890. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

PMID:
30808271
2.

'Please sort these voice recordings into 2 identities': Effects of task instructions on performance in voice sorting studies.

Lavan N, Merriman SE, Ladwa P, Burston LFK, Knight S, McGettigan C.

Br J Psychol. 2019 Jul 22. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12416. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
31328792
3.

How many voices did you hear? Natural variability disrupts identity perception from unfamiliar voices.

Lavan N, Burston LFK, Garrido L.

Br J Psychol. 2019 Aug;110(3):576-593. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12348. Epub 2018 Sep 16.

4.

Flexible voices: Identity perception from variable vocal signals.

Lavan N, Burton AM, Scott SK, McGettigan C.

Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):90-102. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1497-7. Review.

5.

Impaired generalization of speaker identity in the perception of familiar and unfamiliar voices.

Lavan N, Scott SK, McGettigan C.

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Dec;145(12):1604-1614. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

PMID:
27632378
6.

The advantage of knowing the talker.

Souza P, Gehani N, Wright R, McCloy D.

J Am Acad Audiol. 2013 Sep;24(8):689-700. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.24.8.6.

7.

Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?

Levi SV, Winters SJ, Pisoni DB.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Dec;130(6):4053-62. doi: 10.1121/1.3651816.

8.

Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment.

Kreiman J, Gerratt BR.

J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Oct;108(4):1867-76.

9.

Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.

Kreitewolf J, Mathias SR, von Kriegstein K.

Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 14;8:1584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01584. eCollection 2017.

10.

Individual differences in voice quality perception.

Kreiman J, Gerratt BR, Precoda K, Berke GS.

J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Jun;35(3):512-20.

PMID:
1608242
11.

Familiarity and Voice Representation: From Acoustic-Based Representation to Voice Averages.

Fontaine M, Love SA, Latinus M.

Front Psychol. 2017 Jul 14;8:1180. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01180. eCollection 2017.

12.

Learning-induced changes in the cerebral processing of voice identity.

Latinus M, Crabbe F, Belin P.

Cereb Cortex. 2011 Dec;21(12):2820-8. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr077. Epub 2011 Apr 29.

PMID:
21531779
13.

Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.

Case J, Seyfarth S, Levi SV.

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 May 17;61(5):1251-1260. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0298.

14.

It doesn't matter what you say: FMRI correlates of voice learning and recognition independent of speech content.

Zäske R, Awwad Shiekh Hasan B, Belin P.

Cortex. 2017 Sep;94:100-112. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

15.

Can Listeners Hear Who Is Singing? The Development of Voice Category Perception.

Erickson ML, Burchard J, Phillips P.

J Voice. 2018 Jul;32(4):459-465. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.06.016. Epub 2018 Mar 2.

PMID:
29503102
16.

Understanding the mechanisms of familiar voice-identity recognition in the human brain.

Maguinness C, Roswandowitz C, von Kriegstein K.

Neuropsychologia. 2018 Jul 31;116(Pt B):179-193. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.03.039. Epub 2018 Mar 31. Review.

PMID:
29614253
17.

The Impact of Dysphonic Voices on Healthy Listeners: Listener Reaction Times, Speech Intelligibility, and Listener Comprehension.

Evitts PM, Starmer H, Teets K, Montgomery C, Calhoun L, Schulze A, MacKenzie J, Adams L.

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016 Nov 1;25(4):561-575. doi: 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-14-0183.

PMID:
27784031
18.

Inexperienced Listeners' Perception of Timbre Dissimilarity Within and Between Voice Categories.

Erickson ML.

J Voice. 2018 Oct 10. pii: S0892-1997(18)30307-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.012. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30316552
19.

Comparative findings of voice and speech: language processing at an early ontogenetic age in quantitative EEG mapping.

Radicevic Z, Vujovic M, Jelicic L, Sovilj M.

Exp Brain Res. 2008 Feb;184(4):529-32. Epub 2007 Oct 13.

PMID:
17934726
20.

Fertility-Dependent Acoustic Variation in Women's Voices Previously Shown to Affect Listener Physiology and Perception.

Shoup-Knox ML, Ostrander GM, Reimann GE, Pipitone RN.

Evol Psychol. 2019 Apr-Jun;17(2):1474704919843103. doi: 10.1177/1474704919843103.

PMID:
31023082

Supplemental Content

Support Center