Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 132

1.

The Accuracy of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Interpretation: Impact of the Individual Radiologist and Clinical Factors.

Pickersgill NA, Vetter JM, Raval NS, Andriole GL, Shetty AS, Ippolito JE, Kim EH.

Urology. 2019 May;127:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.035. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

PMID:
30807773
2.

Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Stabile A, Dell'Oglio P, De Cobelli F, Esposito A, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Brembilla G, Cristel G, Cardone G, Deho' F, Losa A, Suardi N, Gaboardi F, Del Maschio A, Montorsi F, Briganti A.

Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.

PMID:
31100225
3.

Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.

Brown LC, Ahmed HU, Faria R, El-Shater Bosaily A, Gabe R, Kaplan RS, Parmar M, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham A, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Bott S, Burns-Cox N, Dudderidge T, Ghei M, Henderson A, Persad R, Rosario DJ, Shergill I, Winkler M, Soares M, Spackman E, Sculpher M, Emberton M.

Health Technol Assess. 2018 Jul;22(39):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta22390.

4.

Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.

Radtke JP, Schwab C, Wolf MB, Freitag MT, Alt CD, Kesch C, Popeneciu IV, Huettenbrink C, Gasch C, Klein T, Bonekamp D, Duensing S, Roth W, Schueler S, Stock C, Schlemmer HP, Roethke M, Hohenfellner M, Hadaschik BA.

Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):846-853. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

PMID:
26810346
5.

Determination of the Role of Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate in Clinical Practice: Is Biopsy Still Necessary?

Wang RS, Kim EH, Vetter JM, Fowler KJ, Shetty AS, Mintz AJ, Badhiwala NG, Grubb RL 3rd, Andriole GL.

Urology. 2017 Apr;102:190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.040. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

PMID:
27845218
7.

Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy.

Hansen NL, Kesch C, Barrett T, Koo B, Radtke JP, Bonekamp D, Schlemmer HP, Warren AY, Wieczorek K, Hohenfellner M, Kastner C, Hadaschik B.

BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):631-638. doi: 10.1111/bju.13711. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

8.

MRI-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Category 5 Lesions Found False-Positive at Multiparametric Prostate MRI.

Sheridan AD, Nath SK, Aneja S, Syed JS, Pahade J, Mathur M, Sprenkle P, Weinreb JC, Spektor M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 May;210(5):W218-W225. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18680. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

PMID:
29489409
9.

PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.

Faiena I, Salmasi A, Mendhiratta N, Markovic D, Ahuja P, Hsu W, Elashoff DA, Raman SS, Reiter RE.

J Urol. 2019 Jan;201(1):91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.08.043.

PMID:
30577397
10.

The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting.

Hansen NL, Barrett T, Koo B, Doble A, Gnanapragasam V, Warren A, Kastner C, Bratt O.

BJU Int. 2017 May;119(5):724-730. doi: 10.1111/bju.13619. Epub 2016 Sep 8.

11.

Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol.

Luzzago S, Musi G, Catellani M, Russo A, Di Trapani E, Mistretta FA, Bianchi R, Cozzi G, Conti A, Pricolo P, Ferro M, Matei DV, Mirone V, Petralia G, de Cobelli O.

Urol Int. 2018;101(1):56-64. doi: 10.1159/000488772. Epub 2018 May 7.

PMID:
29734177
12.

Integration and Diagnostic Accuracy of 3T Nonendorectal coil Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Context of Active Surveillance.

Curci NE, Lane BR, Shankar PR, Noyes SL, Moriarity AK, Kubat A, Brede C, Montgomery JS, Auffenberg GB, Miller DC, Montie JE, George AK, Davenport MS.

Urology. 2018 Jun;116:137-143. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.02.043. Epub 2018 Apr 10.

PMID:
29653121
13.

Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.

Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmöller L, Albers P, Arsov C.

Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.

PMID:
30082150
14.

Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.

Pessoa RR, Viana PC, Mattedi RL, Guglielmetti GB, Cordeiro MD, Coelho RF, Nahas WC, Srougi M.

BJU Int. 2017 Apr;119(4):535-542. doi: 10.1111/bju.13624. Epub 2016 Sep 3.

15.

Prostate cancer detection on transrectal ultrasonography-guided random biopsy despite negative real-time magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided targeted biopsy: reasons for targeted biopsy failure.

Cash H, Günzel K, Maxeiner A, Stephan C, Fischer T, Durmus T, Miller K, Asbach P, Haas M, Kempkensteffen C.

BJU Int. 2016 Jul;118(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/bju.13327. Epub 2015 Oct 20.

16.

Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.

Radtke JP, Wiesenfarth M, Kesch C, Freitag MT, Alt CD, Celik K, Distler F, Roth W, Wieczorek K, Stock C, Duensing S, Roethke MC, Teber D, Schlemmer HP, Hohenfellner M, Bonekamp D, Hadaschik BA.

Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):888-896. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.039. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

PMID:
28400169
17.

Computer-aided diagnosis prior to conventional interpretation of prostate mpMRI: an international multi-reader study.

Greer MD, Lay N, Shih JH, Barrett T, Bittencourt LK, Borofsky S, Kabakus I, Law YM, Marko J, Shebel H, Mertan FV, Merino MJ, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Summers RM, Choyke PL, Turkbey B.

Eur Radiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):4407-4417. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5374-6. Epub 2018 Apr 12.

PMID:
29651763
18.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.

Thompson JE, Moses D, Shnier R, Brenner P, Delprado W, Ponsky L, Pulbrook M, Böhm M, Haynes AM, Hayen A, Stricker PD.

J Urol. 2014 Jul;192(1):67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Feb 8.

PMID:
24518762
19.

The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction.

Distler FA, Radtke JP, Bonekamp D, Kesch C, Schlemmer HP, Wieczorek K, Kirchner M, Pahernik S, Hohenfellner M, Hadaschik BA.

J Urol. 2017 Sep;198(3):575-582. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.03.130. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

PMID:
28373135
20.

Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.

Sheridan AD, Nath SK, Syed JS, Aneja S, Sprenkle PC, Weinreb JC, Spektor M.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):347-357. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18516. Epub 2017 Nov 7.

PMID:
29112469

Supplemental Content

Support Center