Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

2.

Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.

Faisal FA, Sundi D, Pierorazio PM, Ball MW, Humphreys EB, Han M, Epstein JI, Partin AW, Carter HB, Bivalacqua TJ, Schaeffer EM, Ross AE.

BJU Int. 2014 Dec;114(6b):E120-E129. doi: 10.1111/bju.12771. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

3.

Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Koie T, Mitsuzuka K, Yoneyama T, Narita S, Kawamura S, Kaiho Y, Tsuchiya N, Tochigi T, Habuchi T, Arai Y, Ohyama C, Yoneyama T, Tobisawa Y.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Feb;20(1):176-81. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0696-0. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

PMID:
24771079
4.

The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.

Corcoran NM, Casey RG, Hong MK, Pedersen J, Connolly S, Peters J, Harewood L, Gleave ME, Costello AJ, Hovens CM, Goldenberg SL.

BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10681.x. Epub 2011 Nov 15.

5.

Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy core details to predict oncological outcome in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Yashi M, Nukui A, Tokura Y, Takei K, Suzuki I, Sakamoto K, Yuki H, Kambara T, Betsunoh H, Abe H, Fukabori Y, Nakazato Y, Kaji Y, Kamai T.

BMC Urol. 2017 Jun 23;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12894-017-0238-y.

6.

Prostate-specific antigen density predicts favorable pathology and biochemical recurrence in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Kang HW, Jung HD, Lee JY, Kwon JK, Jeh SU, Cho KS, Ham WS, Choi YD.

Asian J Androl. 2016 May-Jun;18(3):480-4. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.154313.

7.

Reassessment of the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy.

Narita S, Mitsuzuka K, Tsuchiya N, Koie T, Kawamura S, Ohyama C, Tochigi T, Yamaguchi T, Arai Y, Habuchi T; Michinoku Japan Urological Cancer Study Group.

Int J Urol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/iju.12898. Epub 2015 Aug 20.

8.

Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with clinically high-risk prostate cancer treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: results from a multi-institutional study of 1100 patients.

Abdollah F, Sood A, Sammon JD, Hsu L, Beyer B, Moschini M, Gandaglia G, Rogers CG, Haese A, Montorsi F, Graefen M, Briganti A, Menon M.

Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):497-505. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.020. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

PMID:
26119559
9.

Preoperative predictive factors and further risk stratification of biochemical recurrence in clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer.

Hamada R, Nakashima J, Ohori M, Ohno Y, Komori O, Yoshioka K, Tachibana M.

Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;21(3):595-600. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0923-3. Epub 2015 Nov 19. Erratum in: Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;21(3):601.

PMID:
26585896
10.
11.

Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.

Oh JJ, Hong SK, Lee JK, Lee BK, Lee S, Kwon OS, Byun SS, Lee SE.

BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E494-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11182.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

12.

Early prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical retropubic prostatectomy: prediction on the basis of preoperative and postoperative tumor characteristics.

Graefen M, Noldus J, Pichlmeier U, Haese A, Hammerer P, Fernandez S, Conrad S, Henke R, Huland E, Huland H.

Eur Urol. 1999;36(1):21-30.

PMID:
10364651
13.

Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.

Pierorazio PM, Ross AE, Lin BM, Epstein JI, Han M, Walsh PC, Partin AW, Pavlovich CP, Schaeffer EM.

BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8):1122-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10986.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

14.

Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.

Özsoy M, D'Andrea D, Moschini M, Foerster B, Abufaraj M, Mathieu R, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI, Roupret M, Seitz C, Czech AK, Susani M, Shariat SF.

Urol Oncol. 2018 Apr;36(4):158.e1-158.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.12.003. Epub 2017 Dec 27.

PMID:
29288003
15.
16.

Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.

Lughezzani G, Gallina A, Larcher A, Briganti A, Capitanio U, Suardi N, Lista G, Abrate A, Sangalli MN, Buffi N, Cestari A, Guazzoni G, Rigatti P, Montorsi F.

BJU Int. 2013 May;111(5):723-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11114.x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.

17.

Preoperative model for predicting prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy using percent of biopsy tissue with cancer, biopsy Gleason grade and serum prostate specific antigen.

Freedland SJ, Terris MK, Csathy GS, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Presti JC Jr, Dorey F, Aronson WJ; Search Database Study Group.

J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2215-20.

PMID:
15126788
18.

Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.

Keefe DT, Schieda N, El Hallani S, Breau RH, Morash C, Robertson SJ, Mai KT, Belanger EC, Flood TA.

Virchows Arch. 2015 Oct;467(4):437-42. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1809-5. Epub 2015 Jul 31.

PMID:
26229020
19.

Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.

Brockman JA, Alanee S, Vickers AJ, Scardino PT, Wood DP, Kibel AS, Lin DW, Bianco FJ Jr, Rabah DM, Klein EA, Ciezki JP, Gao T, Kattan MW, Stephenson AJ.

Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1160-1167. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.019. Epub 2014 Oct 6.

20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center