Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 95

1.

The opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of non-responsiveness to pesticides, sterility inducers and contraceptives.

Shuster SM, Pyzyna B, Mayer LP, Dyer CA.

Heliyon. 2018 Nov 29;4(11):e00943. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00943. eCollection 2018 Nov.

2.

Insect pathogens as biological control agents: Back to the future.

Lacey LA, Grzywacz D, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Frutos R, Brownbridge M, Goettel MS.

J Invertebr Pathol. 2015 Nov;132:1-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.07.009. Epub 2015 Jul 27. Review.

PMID:
26225455
3.

Sexual selection expedites the evolution of pesticide resistance.

Jacomb F, Marsh J, Holman L.

Evolution. 2016 Dec;70(12):2746-2751. doi: 10.1111/evo.13074. Epub 2016 Oct 19.

PMID:
27677862
4.
5.

Modeling effects of ecological factors on evolution of polygenic pesticide resistance.

Haridas CV, Tenhumberg B.

J Theor Biol. 2018 Nov 7;456:224-232. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.07.034. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

PMID:
30075171
6.

Sexual selection in relation to pest-management strategies.

Boake CR, Shelly TE, Kaneshiro KY.

Annu Rev Entomol. 1996;41:211-29.

PMID:
15012328
7.

Evolution of divergent female mating preference in response to experimental sexual selection.

Debelle A, Ritchie MG, Snook RR.

Evolution. 2014 Sep;68(9):2524-33. doi: 10.1111/evo.12473. Epub 2014 Jul 21.

8.
10.

The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Bonduriansky R.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Aug;76(3):305-39. Review.

PMID:
11569787
11.

Myths, models and mitigation of resistance to pesticides.

Hoy MA.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Oct 29;353(1376):1787-95. Review.

12.

Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.

Gosden TP, Reddiex AJ, Chenoweth SF.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 May 22;115(21):5498-5503. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720368115. Epub 2018 May 7.

13.

Conceptual framework and rationale.

Robinson AS, Knols BG, Voigt G, Hendrichs J.

Malar J. 2009 Nov 16;8 Suppl 2:S1. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-S2-S1. Review.

14.

Operational sex ratio predicts the opportunity and direction of sexual selection across animals.

Janicke T, Morrow EH.

Ecol Lett. 2018 Mar;21(3):384-391. doi: 10.1111/ele.12907. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

PMID:
29341415
15.

The Opportunity for Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection in the Ectoparasitic Pea Crab, Dissodactylus primitivus (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae).

Prather RB Jr, Shuster SM.

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 23;10(12):e0145681. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145681. eCollection 2015.

16.

Sexual selection on spontaneous mutations strengthens the between-sex genetic correlation for fitness.

Allen SL, McGuigan K, Connallon T, Blows MW, Chenoweth SF.

Evolution. 2017 Oct;71(10):2398-2409. doi: 10.1111/evo.13310. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

PMID:
28722119
17.

Sexual selection and the risk of extinction in birds.

Morrow EH, Pitcher TE.

Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 7;270(1526):1793-9.

18.

The evolution and maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae).

Dorken ME, Friedman J, Barrett SC.

Evolution. 2002 Jan;56(1):31-41.

PMID:
11915852
19.

Ecology and management of arthropod pests of poultry.

Axtell RC, Arends JJ.

Annu Rev Entomol. 1990;35:101-26. Review.

PMID:
2405769
20.

Lineages evolved under stronger sexual selection show superior ability to invade conspecific competitor populations.

Godwin JL, Spurgin LG, Michalczyk Ł, Martin OY, Lumley AJ, Chapman T, Gage MJG.

Evol Lett. 2018 Aug 16;2(5):511-523. doi: 10.1002/evl3.80. eCollection 2018 Oct.

Supplemental Content

Support Center