Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

The Impact Of Experience On The Risk Of Surgical Margins And Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Learning-Curve Study.

Bravi CA, Tin A, Vertosick E, Mazzone E, Martini A, Dell'Oglio P, Stabile A, Gandaglia G, Fossati N, Suardi N, Gallina A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Vickers A.

J Urol. 2019 Feb 7. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000147. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30747873
2.

Reality of nerve sparing and surgical margins in surgeons' early experience with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in Japan.

Tatsugami K, Yoshioka K, Shiroki R, Eto M, Yoshino Y, Tozawa K, Fukasawa S, Fujisawa M, Takenaka A, Nasu Y, Kashiwagi A, Gotoh M, Terachi T; Japanese Society of Endourology.

Int J Urol. 2017 Mar;24(3):191-196. doi: 10.1111/iju.13281. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

3.

The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy.

Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, Eastham JA, Schrag D, Klein EA, Reuther AM, Kattan MW, Pontes JE, Scardino PT.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Aug 1;99(15):1171-7. Epub 2007 Jul 24.

PMID:
17652279
4.

Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.

Medical Advisory Secretariat.

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.

5.

A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS.

J Urol. 2007 Dec;178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. Epub 2007 Oct 22.

PMID:
17936849
6.

Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.

Albadine R, Hyndman ME, Chaux A, Jeong JY, Saab S, Tavora F, Epstein JI, Gonzalgo ML, Pavlovich CP, Netto GJ.

Hum Pathol. 2012 Feb;43(2):254-60. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.04.029. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

PMID:
21820147
7.

Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.

Sooriakumaran P, Pini G, Nyberg T, Derogar M, Carlsson S, Stranne J, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, Steineck G, Wiklund PN.

Eur Urol. 2018 Apr;73(4):618-627. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.08.015. Epub 2017 Sep 4.

PMID:
28882327
8.

Incidence of positive surgical margins after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: Does the surgeon's experience have an influence on all pathological stages?

Villamil AW, Costabel JI, Billordo Peres N, Martínez PF, Giudice CR, Damia OH.

Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Mar;38(2):84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Oct 9. English, Spanish.

PMID:
24119633
9.

Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.

Koutlidis N, Mourey E, Champigneulle J, Mangin P, Cormier L.

Int J Urol. 2012 Dec;19(12):1076-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03102.x. Epub 2012 Jul 31.

10.

A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients.

Sooriakumaran P, Srivastava A, Shariat SF, Stricker PD, Ahlering T, Eden CG, Wiklund PN, Sanchez-Salas R, Mottrie A, Lee D, Neal DE, Ghavamian R, Nyirady P, Nilsson A, Carlsson S, Xylinas E, Loidl W, Seitz C, Schramek P, Roehrborn C, Cathelineau X, Skarecky D, Shaw G, Warren A, Delprado WJ, Haynes AM, Steyerberg E, Roobol MJ, Tewari AK.

Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):450-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.018. Epub 2013 Nov 24.

PMID:
24290695
11.

The learning curve for surgical margins after open radical prostatectomy: implications for margin status as an oncological end point.

Vickers A, Bianco F, Cronin A, Eastham J, Klein E, Kattan M, Scardino P.

J Urol. 2010 Apr;183(4):1360-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.015. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

12.

Predictors for positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon's series in Japan.

Hashimoto T, Yoshioka K, Gondo T, Takeuchi H, Nakagami Y, Nakashima J, Tachibana M.

Int J Urol. 2013 Sep;20(9):873-8. doi: 10.1111/iju.12081. Epub 2013 Feb 19.

13.

Incidence and location of positive surgical margin among open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: a single institutional analysis.

Koizumi A, Narita S, Nara T, Takayama K, Kanda S, Numakura K, Tsuruta H, Maeno A, Huang M, Saito M, Inoue T, Tsuchiya N, Satoh S, Nanjo H, Habuchi T.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 1;48(8):765-770. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyy092.

PMID:
29931077
14.

The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, Tuerk I, Koenig P, Martínez-Piñeiro L, Janetschek G, Guillonneau B.

Lancet Oncol. 2009 May;10(5):475-80. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70079-8. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

15.

Learning curve of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: Comprehensive evaluation and cumulative summation analysis of oncological outcomes.

Sivaraman A, Sanchez-Salas R, Prapotnich D, Yu K, Olivier F, Secin FP, Barret E, Galiano M, Rozet F, Cathelineau X.

Urol Oncol. 2017 Apr;35(4):149.e1-149.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.10.015. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

PMID:
28117215
16.

Pitfalls of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a comparison of positive surgical margins between robotic and laparoscopic surgery.

Tozawa K, Yasui T, Umemoto Y, Mizuno K, Okada A, Kawai N, Takahashi S, Kohri K.

Int J Urol. 2014 Oct;21(10):976-9. doi: 10.1111/iju.12492. Epub 2014 Jun 10.

17.

The learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an international multicenter study.

Secin FP, Savage C, Abbou C, de La Taille A, Salomon L, Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Rozet F, Cathelineau X, Janetschek G, Nassar F, Turk I, Vanni AJ, Gill IS, Koenig P, Kaouk JH, Martinez Pineiro L, Pansadoro V, Emiliozzi P, Bjartell A, Jiborn T, Eden C, Richards AJ, Van Velthoven R, Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Su LM, Pavlovich CP, Levinson AW, Touijer KA, Vickers A, Guillonneau B.

J Urol. 2010 Dec;184(6):2291-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Oct 16.

18.

Robotic-assisted prostatectomy and open radical retropubic prostatectomy for locally-advanced prostate cancer: multi-institution comparison of oncologic outcomes.

Vora AA, Marchalik D, Kowalczyk KJ, Nissim H, Bandi G, McGeagh KG, Lynch JH, Ghasemian SR, Verghese M, Venkatesan K, Borges P, Uchio EM, Hwang JJ.

Prostate Int. 2013;1(1):31-6. doi: 10.12954/PI.12001. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

19.
20.

Does the experience of the bedside assistant effect the results of robotic surgeons in the learning curve of robot assisted radical prostatectomy?

Cimen HI, Atik YT, Altinova S, Adsan O, Balbay MD.

Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Jan-Feb;45(1):54-60. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0184.

Supplemental Content

Support Center