Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 99

1.

Response to Martin and colleagues: mitochondria do not boost the bioenergetic capacity of eukaryotic cells.

Lynch M, Marinov GK.

Biol Direct. 2018 Nov 29;13(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13062-018-0228-3.

2.

Membranes, energetics, and evolution across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide.

Lynch M, Marinov GK.

Elife. 2017 Mar 16;6. pii: e20437. doi: 10.7554/eLife.20437. Erratum in: Elife. 2018 Jul 05;7:.

3.

The bioenergetic costs of a gene.

Lynch M, Marinov GK.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 22;112(51):15690-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514974112. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

4.

Reply to Lane and Martin: Mitochondria do not boost the bioenergetic capacity of eukaryotic cells.

Lynch M, Marinov GK.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Feb 9;113(6):E667-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1523394113. Epub 2016 Jan 25. No abstract available.

5.

Energetics and genetics across the prokaryote-eukaryote divide.

Lane N.

Biol Direct. 2011 Jun 30;6:35. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-6-35.

6.

Some Liked It Hot: A Hypothesis Regarding Establishment of the Proto-Mitochondrial Endosymbiont During Eukaryogenesis.

Dunn CD.

J Mol Evol. 2017 Oct;85(3-4):99-106. doi: 10.1007/s00239-017-9809-5. Epub 2017 Sep 15. Review.

7.

Bioenergetic evolution in proteobacteria and mitochondria.

Degli Esposti M.

Genome Biol Evol. 2014 Nov 27;6(12):3238-51. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu257.

8.

The Bioenergetic Health Index: a new concept in mitochondrial translational research.

Chacko BK, Kramer PA, Ravi S, Benavides GA, Mitchell T, Dranka BP, Ferrick D, Singal AK, Ballinger SW, Bailey SM, Hardy RW, Zhang J, Zhi D, Darley-Usmar VM.

Clin Sci (Lond). 2014 Sep;127(6):367-73. doi: 10.1042/CS20140101. Review.

9.

Bioenergetic profile of human coronary artery smooth muscle cells and effect of metabolic intervention.

Yang M, Chadwick AE, Dart C, Kamishima T, Quayle JM.

PLoS One. 2017 May 19;12(5):e0177951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177951. eCollection 2017.

10.

Was the Mitochondrion Necessary to Start Eukaryogenesis?

Hampl V, Čepička I, Eliáš M.

Trends Microbiol. 2019 Feb;27(2):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Nov 19. Review.

PMID:
30466901
12.

The Physiology of Phagocytosis in the Context of Mitochondrial Origin.

Martin WF, Tielens AGM, Mentel M, Garg SG, Gould SB.

Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2017 Jun 14;81(3). pii: e00008-17. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00008-17. Print 2017 Sep. Review.

13.

Bioenergetic constraints on the evolution of complex life.

Lane N.

Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014 May 1;6(5):a015982. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015982. Review.

14.

Physiology, anaerobes, and the origin of mitosing cells 50 years on.

Martin WF.

J Theor Biol. 2017 Dec 7;434:2-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 11. Review.

PMID:
28087421
15.

The changing view of eukaryogenesis - fossils, cells, lineages and how they all come together.

Dacks JB, Field MC, Buick R, Eme L, Gribaldo S, Roger AJ, Brochier-Armanet C, Devos DP.

J Cell Sci. 2016 Oct 15;129(20):3695-3703. Epub 2016 Sep 26. Review.

16.

The energetics of genome complexity.

Lane N, Martin W.

Nature. 2010 Oct 21;467(7318):929-34. doi: 10.1038/nature09486.

PMID:
20962839
17.

Mitochondria, bioenergetics, and the epigenome in eukaryotic and human evolution.

Wallace DC.

Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2009;74:383-93. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2009.74.031. Epub 2009 Dec 2. Review.

18.

Eukaryogenesis, how special really?

Booth A, Doolittle WF.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):10278-85. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421376112. Epub 2015 Apr 16. Review.

19.

Eukaryotic evolution, changes and challenges.

Embley TM, Martin W.

Nature. 2006 Mar 30;440(7084):623-30. Review.

PMID:
16572163
20.

Relative timing of mitochondrial endosymbiosis and the "pre-mitochondrial symbioses" hypothesis.

Gabaldón T.

IUBMB Life. 2018 Dec;70(12):1188-1196. doi: 10.1002/iub.1950. Epub 2018 Oct 25. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center