Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 101

1.

Risk of biochemical recurrence based on extent and location of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Marcq G, Michelet A, Hannink G, Rizk J, Sauvain J, Villers A, Saffarini M, Rochat CH.

BMC Cancer. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):1291. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-5229-1. Erratum in: BMC Cancer. 2019 Feb 7;19(1):124.

2.

Significant reduction in positive surgical margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by application of the modified surgical margin recommendations of the 2009 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus.

Maxeiner A, Magheli A, Jöhrens K, Kilic E, Braun TL, Kempkensteffen C, Hinz S, Stephan C, Miller K, Busch J.

BJU Int. 2016 Nov;118(5):750-757. doi: 10.1111/bju.13451. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

3.

Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.

De La Roca RL, Da Cunha IW, Bezerra SM, Da Fonseca FP.

Int Braz J Urol. 2014 May-Jun;40(3):306-15. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.03.03.

4.

The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

Sooriakumaran P, Ploumidis A, Nyberg T, Olsson M, Akre O, Haendler L, Egevad L, Nilsson A, Carlsson S, Jonsson M, Adding C, Hosseini A, Steineck G, Wiklund P.

BJU Int. 2015 Jan;115(1):106-13. doi: 10.1111/bju.12483.

5.

First Danish single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy: impact of surgical margins on biochemical outcome.

Vrang ML, Røder MA, Vainer B, Christensen IJ, Gruschy L, Brasso K, Iversen P.

Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;46(3):172-9. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2011.644860. Epub 2012 Feb 9.

PMID:
22320899
6.

Positive surgical margin in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: correlation with pathology findings and risk of biochemical recurrence.

Jo JK, Hong SK, Byun SS, Zargar H, Autorino R, Lee SE.

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Oct;69(5):493-500. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.17.02707-2. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

7.

Association of Anterior and Lateral Extraprostatic Extensions with Base-Positive Resection Margins in Prostate Cancer.

Kang YJ, Abalajon MJ, Jang WS, Kwon JK, Yoon CY, Lee JY, Cho KS, Ham WS, Choi YD.

PLoS One. 2016 Jul 8;11(7):e0158922. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158922. eCollection 2016.

8.

Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Godoy G, Tareen BU, Lepor H.

BJU Int. 2009 Dec;104(11):1610-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08688.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.

9.

Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy.

Dev HS, Wiklund P, Patel V, Parashar D, Palmer K, Nyberg T, Skarecky D, Neal DE, Ahlering T, Sooriakumaran P.

Urol Oncol. 2015 Mar;33(3):109.e7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

PMID:
25512161
10.

Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging.

Ouzzane A, Rozet F, Salas RS, Galiano M, Barret E, Prapotnich D, Cathelineau X.

BJU Int. 2014 Apr;113(4):586-91. doi: 10.1111/bju.12249. Epub 2013 Jul 26.

11.

Long-term oncological outcomes of apical positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy in the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital cohort.

Wadhwa H, Terris MK, Aronson WJ, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Cooperberg MR, Freedland SJ, Abern MR.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2016 Dec;19(4):423-428. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2016.45. Epub 2016 Oct 4.

PMID:
27698440
12.

Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.

Ritch CR, You C, May AT, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Penson DF, Chang SS, Cookson MS, Smith JA Jr, Barocas DA.

Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.023. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

PMID:
24746665
13.

High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.

Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP, Rasiah KK, Haynes AM, Chatfield M, Stricker PD, Turner JJ, Delprado W, Henshall SM, Sutherland RL, Kench JG.

BJU Int. 2012 Jun;109(12):1794-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10572.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

14.

Comparison of the rate, location and size of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Kasraeian A, Barret E, Chan J, Sanchez-Salas R, Validire P, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Galiano M, Vallancien G.

BJU Int. 2011 Oct;108(7):1174-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.10077.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.

15.

Impact of positive surgical margins and their locations after radical prostatectomy: comparison of biochemical recurrence according to risk stratification and surgical modality.

Choo MS, Cho SY, Ko K, Jeong CW, Lee SB, Ku JH, Hong SK, Byun SS, Kwak C, Kim HH, Lee SE, Jeong H.

World J Urol. 2014 Dec;32(6):1401-9. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1230-0. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

PMID:
24362883
16.

Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.

O'Neil LM, Walsh S, Cohen RJ, Lee S.

BJU Int. 2015 Oct;116 Suppl 3:42-8. doi: 10.1111/bju.13173. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

17.

Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.

Shapiro EY, Scarberry K, Patel T, Bergman A, Ahn JJ, Sahi N, RoyChoudhury A, Deutch I, McKiernan JM, Benson MC, Badani KK.

J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):208-13. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0393. Epub 2013 Nov 9.

PMID:
24044423
18.

Risk factors for biochemical recurrence following radical perineal prostatectomy in a large contemporary series: a detailed assessment of margin extent and location.

Sammon JD, Trinh QD, Sukumar S, Ravi P, Friedman A, Sun M, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Jeong W, Mander N, Peabody JO, Karakiewicz PI, Harris M.

Urol Oncol. 2013 Nov;31(8):1470-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

PMID:
22534086
19.

Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Locally-advanced Prostate Cancer.

Gandaglia G, De Lorenzis E, Novara G, Fossati N, De Groote R, Dovey Z, Suardi N, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Rocco B, Mottrie A.

Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 18.

PMID:
27209538
20.

Impact of Multifocality and Multilocation of Positive Surgical Margin After Radical Prostatectomy on Predicting Oncological Outcome.

Wu S, Lin SX, Wirth GJ, Lu M, Lu J, Subtelny AO, Wang Z, Dahl DM, Olumi AF, Wu CL.

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Feb;17(1):e44-e52. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 30.

PMID:
30287224

Supplemental Content

Support Center