Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 93

1.

Divergent immune responses to synthetic and biological scaffolds.

Sadtler K, Wolf MT, Ganguly S, Moad CA, Chung L, Majumdar S, Housseau F, Pardoll DM, Elisseeff JH.

Biomaterials. 2019 Feb;192:405-415. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

PMID:
30500722
2.

Key players in the immune response to biomaterial scaffolds for regenerative medicine.

Chung L, Maestas DR Jr, Housseau F, Elisseeff JH.

Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2017 May 15;114:184-192. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 13. Review.

PMID:
28712923
3.

Designing biomaterials with immunomodulatory properties for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Andorko JI, Jewell CM.

Bioeng Transl Med. 2017 May 16;2(2):139-155. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10063. eCollection 2017 Jun. Review.

4.

Macrophages, Foreign Body Giant Cells and Their Response to Implantable Biomaterials.

Sheikh Z, Brooks PJ, Barzilay O, Fine N, Glogauer M.

Materials (Basel). 2015 Aug 28;8(9):5671-5701. doi: 10.3390/ma8095269. Review.

5.

Promoting tissue regeneration by modulating the immune system.

Julier Z, Park AJ, Briquez PS, Martino MM.

Acta Biomater. 2017 Apr 15;53:13-28. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.056. Epub 2017 Jan 22. Review.

6.

Foreign body reaction to biomaterials.

Anderson JM, Rodriguez A, Chang DT.

Semin Immunol. 2008 Apr;20(2):86-100. Epub 2007 Dec 26. Review.

7.

ADM Scaffolds Generate a Pro-regenerative Microenvironment During Full-Thickness Cutaneous Wound Healing Through M2 Macrophage Polarization via Lamtor1.

He C, Yang Z, Jin Y, Qi X, Chu J, Deng X.

Front Physiol. 2018 Jun 4;9:657. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00657. eCollection 2018.

8.

Developing a pro-regenerative biomaterial scaffold microenvironment requires T helper 2 cells.

Sadtler K, Estrellas K, Allen BW, Wolf MT, Fan H, Tam AJ, Patel CH, Luber BS, Wang H, Wagner KR, Powell JD, Housseau F, Pardoll DM, Elisseeff JH.

Science. 2016 Apr 15;352(6283):366-70. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9272.

9.

In vivo xenogeneic scaffold fate is determined by residual antigenicity and extracellular matrix preservation.

Wong ML, Wong JL, Vapniarsky N, Griffiths LG.

Biomaterials. 2016 Jun;92:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.024. Epub 2016 Mar 19.

10.

Monocytes and macrophages in tissue repair: Implications for immunoregenerative biomaterial design.

Ogle ME, Segar CE, Sridhar S, Botchwey EA.

Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2016 May;241(10):1084-97. doi: 10.1177/1535370216650293. Review.

11.

Bone extracts immunomodulate and enhance the regenerative performance of dicalcium phosphates bioceramics.

Mansour A, Abu-Nada L, Al-Waeli H, Mezour MA, Abdallah MN, Kinsella JM, Kort-Mascort J, Henderson JE, Ramirez-Garcialuna JL, Tran SD, Elkashty OA, Mousa A, El-Hadad AA, Taqi D, Al-Hamad F, Alageel O, Kaartinen MT, Tamimi F.

Acta Biomater. 2019 Apr 15;89:343-358. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

PMID:
30853609
12.

A biologic scaffold-associated type 2 immune microenvironment inhibits tumor formation and synergizes with checkpoint immunotherapy.

Wolf MT, Ganguly S, Wang TL, Anderson CW, Sadtler K, Narain R, Cherry C, Parrillo AJ, Park BV, Wang G, Pan F, Sukumar S, Pardoll DM, Elisseeff JH.

Sci Transl Med. 2019 Jan 30;11(477). pii: eaat7973. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat7973.

PMID:
30700576
13.

Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response.

Aamodt JM, Grainger DW.

Biomaterials. 2016 Apr;86:68-82. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.003. Epub 2016 Feb 3. Review.

14.

Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering.

Chen FM, Liu X.

Prog Polym Sci. 2016 Feb 1;53:86-168. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

15.

A new class of biological materials: Cell membrane-derived hydrogel scaffolds.

Fan Z, Deng J, Li PY, Chery DR, Su Y, Zhu P, Kambayashi T, Blankenhorn EP, Han L, Cheng H.

Biomaterials. 2019 Mar;197:244-254. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 11.

PMID:
30669015
16.

Immunomodulatory polymeric scaffold enhances extracellular matrix production in cell co-cultures under dynamic mechanical stimulation.

Battiston KG, Labow RS, Simmons CA, Santerre JP.

Acta Biomater. 2015 Sep;24:74-86. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.05.038. Epub 2015 Jun 17.

PMID:
26093069
17.

Wound Healing Versus Regeneration: Role of the Tissue Environment in Regenerative Medicine.

Atala A, Irvine DJ, Moses M, Shaunak S.

MRS Bull. 2010 Aug 1;35(8). doi: 10.1557/mrs2010.528.

18.

Chitin scaffolds in tissue engineering.

Jayakumar R, Chennazhi KP, Srinivasan S, Nair SV, Furuike T, Tamura H.

Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(3):1876-87. doi: 10.3390/ijms12031876. Epub 2011 Mar 15. Review.

19.

Inhibition of COX1/2 alters the host response and reduces ECM scaffold mediated constructive tissue remodeling in a rodent model of skeletal muscle injury.

Dearth CL, Slivka PF, Stewart SA, Keane TJ, Tay JK, Londono R, Goh Q, Pizza FX, Badylak SF.

Acta Biomater. 2016 Feb;31:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.043. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

20.

Response of human macrophages to wound matrices in vitro.

Witherel CE, Graney PL, Freytes DO, Weingarten MS, Spiller KL.

Wound Repair Regen. 2016 May;24(3):514-24. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12423. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

PMID:
26874797

Supplemental Content

Support Center