Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 136

1.

Propensity-score matching with competing risks in survival analysis.

Austin PC, Fine JP.

Stat Med. 2019 Feb 28;38(5):751-777. doi: 10.1002/sim.8008. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

PMID:
30347461
2.
3.
4.

Optimal full matching for survival outcomes: a method that merits more widespread use.

Austin PC, Stuart EA.

Stat Med. 2015 Dec 30;34(30):3949-67. doi: 10.1002/sim.6602. Epub 2015 Aug 6.

5.

Covariate-adjusted survival analyses in propensity-score matched samples: Imputing potential time-to-event outcomes.

Austin PC, Thomas N, Rubin DB.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Dec 20:962280218817926. doi: 10.1177/0962280218817926. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30569832
6.
7.

The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal hazard ratios.

Austin PC.

Stat Med. 2013 Jul 20;32(16):2837-49. doi: 10.1002/sim.5705. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

8.

Type I error rates, coverage of confidence intervals, and variance estimation in propensity-score matched analyses.

Austin PC.

Int J Biostat. 2009 Apr 14;5(1):Article 13. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1146.

10.

Double propensity-score adjustment: A solution to design bias or bias due to incomplete matching.

Austin PC.

Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Feb;26(1):201-222. doi: 10.1177/0962280214543508. Epub 2016 Sep 30.

11.

Practical recommendations for reporting Fine-Gray model analyses for competing risk data.

Austin PC, Fine JP.

Stat Med. 2017 Nov 30;36(27):4391-4400. doi: 10.1002/sim.7501. Epub 2017 Sep 15.

12.

Front-line intraperitoneal versus intravenous chemotherapy in stage III-IV epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer with minimal residual disease: a competing risk analysis.

Chang YH, Li WH, Chang Y, Peng CW, Cheng CH, Chang WP, Chuang CM.

BMC Cancer. 2016 Mar 17;16:235. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2279-0.

13.
15.

The use of bootstrapping when using propensity-score matching without replacement: a simulation study.

Austin PC, Small DS.

Stat Med. 2014 Oct 30;33(24):4306-19. doi: 10.1002/sim.6276. Epub 2014 Aug 4.

17.

Analysis and design of randomised clinical trials involving competing risks endpoints.

Tai BC, Wee J, Machin D.

Trials. 2011 May 19;12:127. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-127.

18.

Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks.

Austin PC, Lee DS, Fine JP.

Circulation. 2016 Feb 9;133(6):601-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.017719.

19.
20.

Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.

Austin PC.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1218-25. doi: 10.1002/pds.1674.

PMID:
18972455

Supplemental Content

Support Center