Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 87

1.

Feasibility Trial of the Newly Introduced Optical Enhancement Technology in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Thomaidis T, Rahman F, Thieringer F, Tontini GE, Mönkemüller K, Ishaq S, Galle PR, Neumann H.

Dig Dis. 2018;36(6):450-455. doi: 10.1159/000490761. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

2.

A feasibility trial of narrow band imaging endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Sharma P, Wani S, Bansal A, Hall S, Puli S, Mathur S, Rastogi A.

Gastroenterology. 2007 Aug;133(2):454-64; quiz 674. Epub 2007 Jun 8.

PMID:
17681166
3.

[Endoscopic examination including magnifying endoscopy for diagnosis of GERD].

Kato M, Ono S, Nakagawa M, Shimizu Y, Asaka M.

Nihon Rinsho. 2007 May;65(5):865-71. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
17511225
4.

Investigation of relationships among gastroesophageal reflux disease subtypes using narrow band imaging magnifying endoscopy.

Lv J, Liu D, Ma SY, Zhang J.

World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec 7;19(45):8391-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8391.

5.

Effect of acid-suppressive therapy on narrow band imaging findings in gastroesophageal reflux disease: a pilot study.

Lynch CR, Wani S, Rastogi A, Keighley J, Mathur S, Higbee A, Bansal A, Gaddam S, Sharma P.

Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):124-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01335.x. Epub 2012 Mar 9.

PMID:
22404535
6.

Image-enhanced endoscopy is specific for the diagnosis of non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Parikh ND, Viana AV, Shah S, Laine L.

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar;53(3):260-264. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1430847. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

7.

Correlation of narrow band imaging endoscopy and histopathology in the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease.

Arul P, Vinoth B, Alexander T, Phansalkar M, Padhi S.

Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):330-6. doi: 10.4103/1319-3767.164205.

8.

Prevalence and predictors of columnar lined esophagus in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients undergoing upper endoscopy.

Balasubramanian G, Singh M, Gupta N, Gaddam S, Giacchino M, Wani SB, Moloney B, Higbee AD, Rastogi A, Bansal A, Sharma P.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov;107(11):1655-61. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.299. Epub 2012 Oct 2.

PMID:
23032983
9.

Microalterations of esophagus in patients with non-erosive reflux disease: in-vivo diagnosis by confocal laser endomicroscopy and its relationship with gastroesophageal reflux.

Chu CL, Zhen YB, Lv GP, Li CQ, Li Z, Qi QQ, Gu XM, Yu T, Zhang TG, Zhou CJ, Rui-Ji, Li YQ.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Jun;107(6):864-74. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.44. Epub 2012 Mar 13.

PMID:
22415199
11.

Enhanced endoscopic imaging and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Banerjee R, Reddy DN.

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep;30(5):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s12664-011-0137-1. Epub 2011 Oct 19. Review.

PMID:
22009671
12.

Detection of minimal mucosal esophageal lesions in non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease using optical enhancement plus optical magnification.

Robles-Medranda C, Valero M, Soria-Alcívar M, Puga-Tejada M, Oleas R, Ospina J, Alvarado-Escobar H, Baquerizo-Burgos J, Pitanga-Lukashok H.

Endosc Int Open. 2019 Aug;7(8):E979-E986. doi: 10.1055/a-0953-1844. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

13.

Helicobacter pylori infection, not gastroesophageal reflux, is the major cause of inflammation and intestinal metaplasia of gastric cardiac mucosa.

Goldblum JR, Richter JE, Vaezi M, Falk GW, Rice TW, Peek RM.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Feb;97(2):302-11.

PMID:
11866266
14.

Esophageal intraluminal baseline impedance differentiates gastroesophageal reflux disease from functional heartburn.

Kandulski A, Weigt J, Caro C, Jechorek D, Wex T, Malfertheiner P.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jun;13(6):1075-81. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.11.033. Epub 2014 Dec 9.

PMID:
25496815
15.

Enhanced expression of interleukin-8 and activation of nuclear factor kappa-B in endoscopy-negative gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Isomoto H, Saenko VA, Kanazawa Y, Nishi Y, Ohtsuru A, Inoue K, Akazawa Y, Takeshima F, Omagari K, Miyazaki M, Mizuta Y, Murata I, Yamashita S, Kohno S.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Apr;99(4):589-97.

PMID:
15089887
16.

Reassessment of the diagnostic value of histology in patients with GERD, using multiple biopsy sites and an appropriate control group.

Zentilin P, Savarino V, Mastracci L, Spaggiari P, Dulbecco P, Ceppa P, Savarino E, Parodi A, Mansi C, Fiocca R.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Oct;100(10):2299-306.

PMID:
16181384
17.

Lugol chromoendoscopy as a diagnostic tool in so-called endoscopy-negative GERD.

Yoshikawa I, Yamasaki M, Yamasaki T, Kume K, Otsuki M.

Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Nov;62(5):698-703; quiz 752, 754.

PMID:
16246682
18.

Multilayered epithelium in mucosal biopsy specimens from the gastroesophageal junction region is a histologic marker of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Glickman JN, Spechler SJ, Souza RF, Lunsford T, Lee E, Odze RD.

Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Jun;33(6):818-25. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181984697.

PMID:
19295405
19.

The feasibility of light microscopic measurements of intercellular spaces in squamous epithelium in the lower-esophagus of GERD patients.

Cui R, Zhou L, Lin S, Xue Y, Duan L, Xia Z, Jin Z, Zhang H, Zhang J, Song Z, Yan X.

Dis Esophagus. 2011 Jan;24(1):1-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01083.x.

PMID:
20626453
20.

Endoscope versus microscope in the diagnosis of esophageal non-erosive reflux disease: a study of 71 cases.

Arul P, Phansalkar M, Alexander T, Padhi S, Vinoth B.

Malays J Pathol. 2014 Dec;36(3):181-8.

Supplemental Content

Support Center