Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 109

1.

A qualitative study of Institutional Ethics Committees: Members' understanding of research guidelines, privacy, and challenges to privacy protection.

Mishra NN, Bhatia T, Nimgaonkar VL, Deshpande SN, Parker LS.

Indian J Med Ethics. 2018 Jul 10;-(-):1-6. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2018.054. [Epub ahead of print]

2.

Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers' perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies.

Birchley G, Huxtable R, Murtagh M, Ter Meulen R, Flach P, Gooberman-Hill R.

BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0183-z.

3.
4.

Institutional review board training when patients and community members are engaged as researchers.

Westfall JM, Zittleman L, Felzien M, Ringel M, Lakin A, Nease D; High Plains Research Network Community Advisory Council.

Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):301-304. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw112.

5.

The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts.

Mittelstadt BD, Floridi L.

Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):303-41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2. Epub 2015 May 23. Review.

PMID:
26002496
6.

Security and privacy requirements for a multi-institutional cancer research data grid: an interview-based study.

Manion FJ, Robbins RJ, Weems WA, Crowley RS.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Jun 15;9:31. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-31.

7.

Too much information: visual research ethics in the age of wearable cameras.

Mok TM, Cornish F, Tarr J.

Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015 Jun;49(2):309-22. doi: 10.1007/s12124-014-9289-8. Review.

PMID:
25537955
8.

Establishing institutional ethics committees: challenges and solutions - a review of the literature.

Kuyare MS, Taur SR, Thatte UM.

Indian J Med Ethics. 2014 Jul-Sep;11(3):181-5. Review.

9.

Institutional review boards' use and understanding of certificates of confidentiality.

Beskow LM, Check DK, Namey EE, Dame LA, Lin L, Cooper A, Weinfurt KP, Wolf LE.

PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044050. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

10.

Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research.

Nebeker C, Lagare T, Takemoto M, Lewars B, Crist K, Bloss CS, Kerr J.

Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):577-586.

11.
12.
13.

Ethics in qualitative health research.

Oberle KM.

Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 2002 Dec;35(8 Suppl.):563-6.

PMID:
15015501
14.

Young people's views about the purpose and composition of research ethics committees: findings from the PEARL qualitative study.

Audrey S, Brown L, Campbell R, Boyd A, Macleod J.

BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Sep 2;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0133-1.

15.

Resolving ethical dilemmas about privacy and confidentiality. Guidelines for decision making.

Weber LJ.

Clin Lab Manage Rev. 1992 Nov-Dec;6(6):514-6, 518-20.

PMID:
10128838
16.

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice about Research Ethics among Dental Faculty in the North India.

Mallela KK, Walia R, Tm CD, Das M, Sepolia S, Sethi P.

J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(Suppl 2):52-6.

17.

Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities.

Brown MJ, Symonowicz C, Medina LV, Bratcher NA, Buckmaster CA, Klein H, Anderson LC.

In: Weichbrod RH, Thompson GAH, Norton JN, editors. Management of Animal Care and Use Programs in Research, Education, and Testing. 2nd edition. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2018. Chapter 2.

18.

Assessing Institutional Ethics Committees in India Using the IRB-RAT.

Chenneville T, Menezes L, Bylsma LM, Mann A, Kosambiya J, Baxi R.

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Oct;9(4):50-9. doi: 10.1177/1556264614544101. Epub 2014 Aug 5.

19.

Familiar ethical issues amplified: how members of research ethics committees describe ethical distinctions between disaster and non-disaster research.

Tansey CM, Anderson J, Boulanger RF, Eckenwiler L, Pringle J, Schwartz L, Hunt M.

BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jun 28;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0203-z.

20.

Ethical considerations in malaria research proposal review: empirical evidence from 114 proposals submitted to an Ethics Committee in Thailand.

Adams P, Prakobtham S, Limphattharacharoen C, Vutikes P, Khusmith S, Pengsaa K, Wilairatana P, Kaewkungwal J.

Malar J. 2015 Sep 14;14:342. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0854-5.

Supplemental Content

Support Center