Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 141

1.

Comparison of 4D Flow MRI and Particle Image Velocimetry Using an In Vitro Carotid Bifurcation Model.

Medero R, Hoffman C, Roldán-Alzate A.

Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Dec;46(12):2112-2122. doi: 10.1007/s10439-018-02109-9. Epub 2018 Aug 15.

PMID:
30112708
2.

In vitro and preliminary in vivo validation of echo particle image velocimetry in carotid vascular imaging.

Zhang F, Lanning C, Mazzaro L, Barker AJ, Gates PE, Strain WD, Fulford J, Gosling OE, Shore AC, Bellenger NG, Rech B, Chen J, Chen J, Shandas R.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Mar;37(3):450-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.11.017.

3.

Independent validation of four-dimensional flow MR velocities and vortex ring volume using particle imaging velocimetry and planar laser-Induced fluorescence.

Töger J, Bidhult S, Revstedt J, Carlsson M, Arheden H, Heiberg E.

Magn Reson Med. 2016 Mar;75(3):1064-75. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25683. Epub 2015 May 2.

PMID:
25940239
4.

Comparison of intracranial aneurysm flow quantification techniques: standard PIV vs stereoscopic PIV vs tomographic PIV vs phase-contrast MRI vs CFD.

Roloff C, Stucht D, Beuing O, Berg P.

J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Mar;11(3):275-282. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013921. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

PMID:
30061369
5.

Echo Particle Image Velocimetry for Estimation of Carotid Artery Wall Shear Stress: Repeatability, Reproducibility and Comparison with Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Gurung A, Gates PE, Mazzaro L, Fulford J, Zhang F, Barker AJ, Hertzberg J, Aizawa K, Strain WD, Elyas S, Shore AC, Shandas R.

Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017 Aug;43(8):1618-1627. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.03.020. Epub 2017 May 10.

PMID:
28501327
6.

In vitro validation of flow measurement with phase contrast MRI at 3 tesla using stereoscopic particle image velocimetry and stereoscopic particle image velocimetry-based computational fluid dynamics.

Khodarahmi I, Shakeri M, Kotys-Traughber M, Fischer S, Sharp MK, Amini AA.

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jun;39(6):1477-85. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24322. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

PMID:
24123721
7.

Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.

van Ooij P, Guédon A, Poelma C, Schneiders J, Rutten MC, Marquering HA, Majoie CB, VanBavel E, Nederveen AJ.

NMR Biomed. 2012 Jan;25(1):14-26. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1706. Epub 2011 Apr 8.

PMID:
21480417
8.

[Particle image velocimetry in measuring the flow fields distribution in carotid artery bifurcation model].

Yu F, Shi Y, Deng W, Chen H, An Q, Guo Y.

Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Feb;24(1):104-9. Chinese.

PMID:
17333901
9.

Validation and reproducibility of cardiovascular 4D-flow MRI from two vendors using 2 × 2 parallel imaging acceleration in pulsatile flow phantom and in vivo with and without respiratory gating.

Bock J, Töger J, Bidhult S, Markenroth Bloch K, Arvidsson P, Kanski M, Arheden H, Testud F, Greiser A, Heiberg E, Carlsson M.

Acta Radiol. 2019 Mar;60(3):327-337. doi: 10.1177/0284185118784981. Epub 2018 Jun 26.

10.

Comparison of blood flow velocity quantification by 4D flow MR imaging with ultrasound at the carotid bifurcation.

Harloff A, Zech T, Wegent F, Strecker C, Weiller C, Markl M.

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Jul;34(7):1407-13. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3419. Epub 2013 Feb 14.

12.
13.

Peak velocity measurements in tortuous arteries with phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging: the effect of multidirectional velocity encoding.

Schubert T, Bieri O, Pansini M, Stippich C, Santini F.

Invest Radiol. 2014 Apr;49(4):189-94. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000013.

PMID:
24300842
14.

Three-Dimensional Strain Measurements of a Tubular Elastic Model Using Tomographic Particle Image Velocimetry.

Takahashi A, Zhu X, Aoyama Y, Umezu M, Iwasaki K.

Cardiovasc Eng Technol. 2018 Sep;9(3):395-404. doi: 10.1007/s13239-018-0350-5. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

PMID:
29560585
15.

3-D flow characterization and shear stress in a stenosed carotid artery bifurcation model using stereoscopic PIV technique.

Kefayati S, Poepping TL.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:3386-9. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627933.

PMID:
21097242
16.

Accuracy and limitations of vector flow mapping: left ventricular phantom validation using stereo particle image velocimetory.

Asami R, Tanaka T, Kawabata KI, Hashiba K, Okada T, Nishiyama T.

J Echocardiogr. 2017 Jun;15(2):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s12574-016-0321-5. Epub 2016 Nov 15. Erratum in: J Echocardiogr. 2018 May 5;:.

17.

Quantification of tomographic PIV uncertainty using controlled experimental measurements.

Liu N, Wu Y, Ma L.

Appl Opt. 2018 Jan 20;57(3):420-427. doi: 10.1364/AO.57.000420. Erratum in: Appl Opt. 2018 Oct 10;57(29):8624.

PMID:
29400791
18.

Transitional flow analysis in the carotid artery bifurcation by proper orthogonal decomposition and particle image velocimetry.

Kefayati S, Poepping TL.

Med Eng Phys. 2013 Jul;35(7):898-909. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.08.020. Epub 2012 Sep 29.

PMID:
23025907
19.

High-Frame-Rate Contrast-enhanced US Particle Image Velocimetry in the Abdominal Aorta: First Human Results.

Engelhard S, Voorneveld J, Vos HJ, Westenberg JJM, Gijsen FJH, Taimr P, Versluis M, de Jong N, Bosch JG, Reijnen MMPJ, Groot Jebbink E.

Radiology. 2018 Oct;289(1):119-125. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018172979. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

PMID:
30015586
20.

Assessment of flow and hemodynamics in the carotid artery using a reduced TE 4D flow spiral phase-contrast MRI.

Kadbi M, Negahdar M, Traughber M, Martin P, Amini AA.

Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:1100-3. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609697.

PMID:
24109884

Supplemental Content

Support Center