Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 102

1.

Radiation Dose Does Matter: Mechanistic Insights into DNA Damage and Repair Support the Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks.

Duncan JR, Lieber MR, Adachi N, Wahl RL.

J Nucl Med. 2018 Jul;59(7):1014-1016. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210252. Epub 2018 May 31. No abstract available.

PMID:
29853652
2.

Reply: Radiation Dose Does Matter: Mechanistic Insights into DNA Damage and Repair Support the Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks

Duncan JR, Lieber MR, Adachi N, Wahl RL.

J Nucl Med. 2018 Nov;59(11):1780-1781. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.218321. Epub 2018 Sep 27. No abstract available.

PMID:
30262519
3.

Challenges to the Paper "Radiation Dose Does Matter: Mechanistic Insights into DNA Damage and Repair Support the Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiation Health Risks".

Bevelacqua JJ.

J Nucl Med. 2018 Nov;59(11):1777-1778. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.217604. Epub 2018 Aug 2. No abstract available.

PMID:
30072498
4.

Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.

Pollycove M, Feinendegen LE.

C R Acad Sci III. 1999 Feb-Mar;322(2-3):197-204. Review.

PMID:
10196673
5.

Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation?

Averbeck D.

Health Phys. 2009 Nov;97(5):493-504. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181b08a20. Review.

PMID:
19820459
6.

DNA damage responses at low radiation doses.

Short SC, Bourne S, Martindale C, Woodcock M, Jackson SP.

Radiat Res. 2005 Sep;164(3):292-302.

PMID:
16137202
7.

An examination of radiation hormesis mechanisms using a multistage carcinogenesis model.

Schöllnberger H, Stewart RD, Mitchel RE, Hofmann W.

Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med. 2004 Oct;2(4):317-52. doi: 10.1080/15401420490900263.

8.

Application of Bayesian inference to characterize risks associated with low doses of low-LET radiation.

Schöllnberger H, Scott BR, Hanson TE.

Bull Math Biol. 2001 Sep;63(5):865-83.

PMID:
11565407
9.

Non-problematic risks from low-dose radiation-induced DNA damage clusters.

Hayes DP.

Dose Response. 2008 Jan 16;6(1):30-52. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.07-023.Hayes.

10.

Carcinogenic effects of low-level ionizing radiation: problems and prospects.

Upton AC.

In Vivo. 2002 Nov-Dec;16(6):527-33. Review.

PMID:
12494897
11.

Damage pattern as a function of radiation quality and other factors.

Burkart W, Jung T, Frasch G.

C R Acad Sci III. 1999 Feb-Mar;322(2-3):89-101. Review.

PMID:
10196658
12.

Radiation hormesis: historical perspective and implications for low-dose cancer risk assessment.

Vaiserman AM.

Dose Response. 2010 Jan 18;8(2):172-91. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-037.Vaiserman.

13.

Do non-targeted effects increase or decrease low dose risk in relation to the linear-non-threshold (LNT) model?

Little MP.

Mutat Res. 2010 May 1;687(1-2):17-27. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2010.01.008. Epub 2010 Jan 25. Review.

14.

Risks from low dose/dose rate radiation: what an understanding of DNA damage response mechanisms can tell us.

Jeggo PA.

Health Phys. 2009 Nov;97(5):416-25. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e3181aff9c8.

PMID:
19820451
15.

[Effects of radiation exposure on human body].

Kamiya K, Sasatani M.

Nihon Rinsho. 2012 Mar;70(3):367-74. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
22514910
16.

Assessing cancer risks of low-dose radiation.

Mullenders L, Atkinson M, Paretzke H, Sabatier L, Bouffler S.

Nat Rev Cancer. 2009 Aug;9(8):596-604. doi: 10.1038/nrc2677. Review.

PMID:
19629073
17.

Compelling Issues Compounding the Understanding of Low Dose Radiation Effects: But Do They Matter?

Morgan WF.

Health Phys. 2016 Mar;110(3):291-2. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000469.

PMID:
26808886
18.

Responses to low doses of ionizing radiation in biological systems.

Feinendegen LE, Pollycove M, Sondhaus CA.

Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med. 2004 Jul;2(3):143-71. doi: 10.1080/15401420490507431.

19.

Radiation-induced versus endogenous DNA damage: possible effect of inducible protective responses in mitigating endogenous damage.

Pollycove M, Feinendegen LE.

Hum Exp Toxicol. 2003 Jun;22(6):290-306; discussion 307, 315-7, 319-23. Review. Erratum in: Hum Exp Toxicol. 2203 Sep;22(9):502.

PMID:
12856953
20.

Measuring DNA Damage and Repair in Mouse Splenocytes After Chronic In Vivo Exposure to Very Low Doses of Beta- and Gamma-Radiation.

Flegal M, Blimkie MS, Wyatt H, Bugden M, Surette J, Klokov D.

J Vis Exp. 2015 Jul 3;(101):e52912. doi: 10.3791/52912.

Supplemental Content

Support Center