Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 100

1.

Age-related Differences in Prestimulus Subsequent Memory Effects Assessed with Event-related Potentials.

Koen JD, Horne ED, Hauck N, Rugg MD.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jun;30(6):829-850. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01249. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

PMID:
29488850
2.

Voluntary control over prestimulus activity related to encoding.

Gruber MJ, Otten LJ.

J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 21;30(29):9793-800. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0915-10.2010.

3.

Individual differences in aging and cognitive control modulate the neural indexes of context updating and maintenance during task switching.

Adrover-Roig D, Barceló F.

Cortex. 2010 Apr;46(4):434-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.09.012. Epub 2009 Nov 4.

PMID:
19889406
4.

Different brain activities predict retrieval success during emotional and semantic encoding.

Padovani T, Koenig T, Brandeis D, Perrig WJ.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Dec;23(12):4008-21. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00096. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

5.

Prestimulus subsequent memory effects for auditory and visual events.

Otten LJ, Quayle AH, Puvaneswaran B.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Jun;22(6):1212-23. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21298.

6.

An ERP study of multidimensional source retrieval in depression.

Barrick EM, Dillon DG.

Biol Psychol. 2018 Feb;132:176-191. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

PMID:
29305874
7.

Electrophysiological correlates of memory encoding are task-dependent.

Otten LJ, Rugg MD.

Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Aug;12(1):11-8.

PMID:
11489604
8.

The influence of directed attention at encoding on source memory retrieval in the young and old: an ERP study.

Dulas MR, Duarte A.

Brain Res. 2013 Mar 15;1500:55-71. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.01.018. Epub 2013 Jan 21.

PMID:
23348376
9.

Electrophysiological evidence for late maturation of strategic episodic retrieval processes.

Sprondel V, Kipp KH, Mecklinger A.

Dev Sci. 2012 May;15(3):330-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01130.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28.

PMID:
22490174
10.

Age differences in the neural correlates underlying control of emotional memory: An event-related potential study.

Gallant SN, Pun C, Yang L.

Brain Res. 2018 Oct 15;1697:83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2018.06.019. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

PMID:
29920247
11.

Timing matters: age-related changes in episodic retrieval control as revealed by event-related potentials.

Sprondel V, Kipp KH, Mecklinger A.

Brain Res. 2013 Nov 6;1537:143-55. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Sep 13.

PMID:
24041773
12.

The amount of retrieval support modulates age effects on episodic memory: evidence from event-related potentials.

Angel L, Isingrini M, Bouazzaoui B, Taconnat L, Allan K, Granjon L, Fay S.

Brain Res. 2010 Jun 4;1335:41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.040. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

PMID:
20346926
13.

Preparation breeds success: Brain activity predicts remembering.

Herron JE, Evans LH.

Cortex. 2018 Sep;106:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 May 9.

14.

Perceptual priming versus explicit memory: dissociable neural correlates at encoding.

Schott B, Richardson-Klavehn A, Heinze HJ, Düzel E.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 May 15;14(4):578-92.

PMID:
12126499
15.

Pre-stimulus neural activity predicts successful encoding of inter-item associations.

Addante RJ, de Chastelaine M, Rugg MD.

Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.046. Epub 2014 Oct 23.

16.

Sustained and transient attentional processes modulate neural predictors of memory encoding in consecutive time periods.

Padovani T, Koenig T, Eckstein D, Perrig WJ.

Brain Behav. 2013 Jul;3(4):464-75. doi: 10.1002/brb3.150. Epub 2013 Jun 16.

17.

Age-related deficits in selective attention during encoding increase demands on episodic reconstruction during context retrieval: An ERP study.

James T, Strunk J, Arndt J, Duarte A.

Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jun;86:66-79. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Apr 16.

18.

Effects of age on negative subsequent memory effects associated with the encoding of item and item-context information.

Mattson JT, Wang TH, de Chastelaine M, Rugg MD.

Cereb Cortex. 2014 Dec;24(12):3322-33. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht193. Epub 2013 Jul 31.

19.

Event-related potentials associated with masked priming of test cues reveal multiple potential contributions to recognition memory.

Woollams AM, Taylor JR, Karayanidis F, Henson RN.

J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Jun;20(6):1114-29. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20076.

PMID:
18211248
20.

ERP markers of target selection discriminate children with high vs. low working memory capacity.

Shimi A, Nobre AC, Scerif G.

Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Nov 5;9:153. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2015.00153. eCollection 2015.

Supplemental Content

Support Center