Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 89

1.

A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Prediction Model for Prostate Biopsy Risk Stratification.

Mehralivand S, Shih JH, Rais-Bahrami S, Oto A, Bednarova S, Nix JW, Thomas JV, Gordetsky JB, Gaur S, Harmon SA, Siddiqui MM, Merino MJ, Parnes HL, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Choyke PL, Turkbey B.

JAMA Oncol. 2018 May 1;4(5):678-685. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.5667.

PMID:
29470570
2.

Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.

Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmöller L, Albers P, Arsov C.

Eur Urol. 2018 Aug 3. pii: S0302-2838(18)30553-0. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
30082150
3.

Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.

Boesen L.

Dan Med J. 2017 Feb;64(2). pii: B5327. Review.

PMID:
28157066
4.

Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.

Tonttila PP, Lantto J, Pääkkö E, Piippo U, Kauppila S, Lammentausta E, Ohtonen P, Vaarala MH.

Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 29.

PMID:
26033153
5.

In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?

Salami SS, Ben-Levi E, Yaskiv O, Ryniker L, Turkbey B, Kavoussi LR, Villani R, Rastinehad AR.

BJU Int. 2015 Apr;115(4):562-70. doi: 10.1111/bju.12938.

6.

Characteristics of Prostate Cancer Found at Fifth Screening in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Rotterdam: Can We Selectively Detect High-grade Prostate Cancer with Upfront Multivariable Risk Stratification and Magnetic Resonance Imaging?

Alberts AR, Schoots IG, Bokhorst LP, Drost FH, van Leenders GJ, Krestin GP, Dwarkasing RS, Barentsz JO, Schröder FH, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ.

Eur Urol. 2017 Jun 21. pii: S0302-2838(17)30514-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.019. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
28647216
7.

Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.

Alberts AR, Schoots IG, Bokhorst LP, van Leenders GJ, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ.

Eur Urol. 2016 Jun;69(6):1129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.11.018. Epub 2015 Dec 2.

PMID:
26651990
8.

Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy.

Siddiqui MM, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong H, Stamatakis L, Vourganti S, Nix J, Hoang AN, Walton-Diaz A, Shuch B, Weintraub M, Kruecker J, Amalou H, Turkbey B, Merino MJ, Choyke PL, Wood BJ, Pinto PA.

Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):713-719. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.059. Epub 2013 Jun 12.

PMID:
23787357
9.

Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.

Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Drost FH, van Leenders GJ, Bokhorst LP, Bangma CH, Schoots IG.

BJU Int. 2017 Oct;120(4):511-519. doi: 10.1111/bju.13836. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

10.

High concordance of findings obtained from transgluteal magnetic resonance imaging - and transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy as compared with prostatectomy specimens.

Steurer S, Rico SD, Simon R, Minner S, Tsourlakis MC, Krech T, Koop C, Graefen M, Heinzer H, Adam M, Huland H, Schlomm T, Sauter G, Lumiani A.

BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):365-376. doi: 10.1111/bju.13840. Epub 2017 Apr 11.

11.

Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.

Kuru TH, Roethke MC, Seidenader J, Simpfendörfer T, Boxler S, Alammar K, Rieker P, Popeneciu VI, Roth W, Pahernik S, Schlemmer HP, Hohenfellner M, Hadaschik BA.

J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4):1380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.043. Epub 2013 Apr 19.

PMID:
23608676
12.

Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer.

Rais-Bahrami S, Siddiqui MM, Turkbey B, Stamatakis L, Logan J, Hoang AN, Walton-Diaz A, Vourganti S, Truong H, Kruecker J, Merino MJ, Wood BJ, Choyke PL, Pinto PA.

J Urol. 2013 Nov;190(5):1721-1727. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.052. Epub 2013 May 29.

PMID:
23727310
13.

Early experience with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies under visual transrectal ultrasound guidance in patients suspicious for prostate cancer undergoing repeated biopsy.

Boesen L, Noergaard N, Chabanova E, Logager V, Balslev I, Mikines K, Thomsen HS.

Scand J Urol. 2015 Feb;49(1):25-34. doi: 10.3109/21681805.2014.925497. Epub 2014 Jun 12.

PMID:
24922550
14.

Defining the learning curve for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate using MRI-transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) fusion-guided transperineal prostate biopsies as a validation tool.

Gaziev G, Wadhwa K, Barrett T, Koo BC, Gallagher FA, Serrao E, Frey J, Seidenader J, Carmona L, Warren A, Gnanapragasam V, Doble A, Kastner C.

BJU Int. 2016 Jan;117(1):80-6. doi: 10.1111/bju.12892. Epub 2015 May 11.

15.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy: A prospective, single centre study.

Bansal S, Gupta NP, Yadav R, Khera R, Ahlawat K, Gautam D, Ahlawat R, Gautam G.

Indian J Urol. 2017 Apr-Jun;33(2):134-139. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.203414.

16.

Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.

Hoeks CM, Schouten MG, Bomers JG, Hoogendoorn SP, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Hambrock T, Vergunst H, Sedelaar JP, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO.

Eur Urol. 2012 Nov;62(5):902-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.047. Epub 2012 Feb 1.

PMID:
22325447
17.

Predicting Benign Prostate Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Men with a Prior Negative 12-core Systematic Biopsy: External Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram.

Bjurlin MA, Renson A, Rais-Bahrami S, Truong M, Rosenkrantz AB, Huang R, Taneja SS.

Eur Urol Focus. 2018 May 22. pii: S2405-4569(18)30122-6. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.05.005. [Epub ahead of print]

PMID:
29802053
18.

Use of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients with prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Walton Diaz A, Shakir NA, George AK, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, Rothwax JT, Stamatakis L, Hong CW, Siddiqui MM, Okoro C, Raskolnikov D, Su D, Shih J, Han H, Parnes HL, Merino MJ, Simon RM, Wood BJ, Choyke PL, Pinto PA.

Urol Oncol. 2015 May;33(5):202.e1-202.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.01.023. Epub 2015 Mar 6.

PMID:
25754621
19.

[Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve and pre-biopsied patients with suspicion for prostate cancer].

Maxeiner A, Stephan C, Fischer T, Durmus T, Kilic E, Asbach P, Haas M, Günzel K, Neymeyer J, Miller K, Cash H.

Aktuelle Urol. 2015 Jan;46(1):34-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395563. Epub 2014 Dec 17. German.

PMID:
25519051
20.

Multicentre evaluation of targeted and systematic biopsies using magnetic resonance and ultrasound image-fusion guided transperineal prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy.

Hansen NL, Kesch C, Barrett T, Koo B, Radtke JP, Bonekamp D, Schlemmer HP, Warren AY, Wieczorek K, Hohenfellner M, Kastner C, Hadaschik B.

BJU Int. 2017 Nov;120(5):631-638. doi: 10.1111/bju.13711. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

Supplemental Content

Support Center