Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 114

1.

Does the application site of spinal manipulative therapy alter spinal tissues loading?

Funabashi M, Nougarou F, Descarreaux M, Prasad N, Kawchuk GN.

Spine J. 2018 Jun;18(6):1041-1052. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Jan 31.

PMID:
29355792
2.

Influence of Spinal Manipulative Therapy Force Magnitude and Application Site on Spinal Tissue Loading: A Biomechanical Robotic Serial Dissection Study in Porcine Motion Segments.

Funabashi M, Nougarou F, Descarreaux M, Prasad N, Kawchuk G.

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Jul - Aug;40(6):387-396. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.05.003.

PMID:
28822473
3.

Spinal Tissue Loading Created by Different Methods of Spinal Manipulative Therapy Application.

Funabashi M, Nougarou F, Descarreaux M, Prasad N, Kawchuk GN.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 May 1;42(9):635-643. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002096.

4.

Tissue loading created during spinal manipulation in comparison to loading created by passive spinal movements.

Funabashi M, Kawchuk GN, Vette AH, Goldsmith P, Prasad N.

Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 1;6:38107. doi: 10.1038/srep38107.

5.

Identification of spinal tissues loaded by manual therapy: a robot-based serial dissection technique applied in porcine motion segments.

Kawchuk GN, Carrasco A, Beecher G, Goertzen D, Prasad N.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 15;35(22):1983-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ddd0a3.

6.

Neuromechanical characterization of in vivo lumbar spinal manipulation. Part I. Vertebral motion.

Keller TS, Colloca CJ, Gunzburg R.

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003 Nov-Dec;26(9):567-78.

PMID:
14673406
7.

The relation between the application angle of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) and resultant vertebral accelerations in an in situ porcine model.

Kawchuk GN, Perle SM.

Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):480-3. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2008.11.001. Epub 2009 Jan 13.

PMID:
19144558
8.

Influence of spinal disc translational stiffness on the lumbar spinal loads, ligament forces and trunk muscle forces during upper body inclination.

Arshad R, Zander T, Bashkuev M, Schmidt H.

Med Eng Phys. 2017 Aug;46:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

PMID:
28666589
9.

Coupled motions in human and porcine thoracic and lumbar spines.

Kingma I, Busscher I, van der Veen AJ, Verkerke GJ, Veldhuizen AG, Homminga J, van Dieën JH.

J Biomech. 2018 Mar 21;70:51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.034. Epub 2017 Dec 6.

PMID:
29246473
10.

Kinematic evaluation of one- and two-level Maverick lumbar total disc replacement caudal to a long thoracolumbar spinal fusion.

Zhu Q, Itshayek E, Jones CF, Schwab T, Larson CR, Lenke LG, Cripton PA.

Eur Spine J. 2012 Jun;21 Suppl 5:S599-611. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2301-4. Epub 2012 Apr 25.

11.

Robotic application of a dynamic resultant force vector using real-time load-control: simulation of an ideal follower load on Cadaveric L4-L5 segments.

Bennett CR, Kelly BP.

J Biomech. 2013 Aug 9;46(12):2087-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.05.031. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

PMID:
23809771
12.

Lumbar facet joint and intervertebral disc loading during simulated pelvic obliquity.

Popovich JM Jr, Welcher JB, Hedman TP, Tawackoli W, Anand N, Chen TC, Kulig K.

Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1581-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 May 21.

PMID:
23706384
13.

The effect of application site of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Edgecombe TL, Kawchuk GN, Long CR, Pickar JG.

Spine J. 2015 Jun 1;15(6):1332-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.480. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

14.
15.

Effects of charité artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol.

Goel VK, Grauer JN, Patel TCh, Biyani A, Sairyo K, Vishnubhotla S, Matyas A, Cowgill I, Shaw M, Long R, Dick D, Panjabi MM, Serhan H.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 15;30(24):2755-64.

PMID:
16371899
16.

Capturing three-dimensional in vivo lumbar intervertebral joint kinematics using dynamic stereo-X-ray imaging.

Aiyangar AK, Zheng L, Tashman S, Anderst WJ, Zhang X.

J Biomech Eng. 2014 Jan;136(1):011004.

PMID:
24149991
17.

Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.

Chen CS, Huang CH, Shih SL.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Apr 9;16:81. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0538-x.

18.

The role of preload forces in spinal manipulation: experimental investigation of kinematic and electromyographic responses in healthy adults.

Nougarou F, Dugas C, Loranger M, Pagé I, Descarreaux M.

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jun;37(5):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.04.002.

19.

Spinal manipulation force and duration affect vertebral movement and neuromuscular responses.

Colloca CJ, Keller TS, Harrison DE, Moore RJ, Gunzburg R, Harrison DD.

Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 Mar;21(3):254-62. Epub 2005 Dec 27.

PMID:
16378668
20.

Patient-Induced Reaction Forces and Moments Are Influenced by Variations in Spinal Manipulative Technique.

D'Angelo K, Triano JJ, Kawchuk GN, Howarth SJ.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jan 15;42(2):E71-E77. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001725.

PMID:
27270638

Supplemental Content

Support Center