Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 108

1.

Standardised cigarette packaging may reduce the implied safety of Natural American Spirit cigarettes.

Leas EC, Pierce JP, Dimofte CV, Trinidad DR, Strong DR.

Tob Control. 2018 Oct;27(e2):e118-e123. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053940. Epub 2017 Dec 18.

2.

How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers' perceptions about brand image? An experimental study.

Wakefield MA, Germain D, Durkin SJ.

Tob Control. 2008 Dec;17(6):416-21. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.026732. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

3.

Impact of plain packaging of cigarettes on the risk perception of Uruguayan smokers: an experimental study.

Harris JE, Ares G, Gerstenbl├╝th M, Machin L, Triunfo P.

Tob Control. 2018 Sep;27(5):513-518. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053639. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

PMID:
28887428
4.

Effects of health-oriented descriptors on combustible cigarette and electronic cigarette packaging: an experiment among adult smokers in the United States.

Sanders-Jackson A, Tan ASL, Yie K.

Tob Control. 2018 Sep;27(5):534-541. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053795. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

PMID:
28983071
5.

US Smokers' Beliefs, Experiences and Perceptions of Different Cigarette Variants Before and After the FSPTCA Ban on Misleading Descriptors Such as "Light," "Mild," or "Low".

Yong HH, Borland R, Cummings KM, Lindblom EN, Li L, Bansal-Travers M, O'Connor RJ, Elton-Marshall T, Thrasher JF, Hammond D, Thompson ME, Partos TR.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Nov;18(11):2115-2123. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw107. Epub 2016 Apr 15.

6.

Perceptions of plain packaging among young adult roll-your-own smokers in France: a naturalistic approach.

Gallopel-Morvan K, Moodie C, Eker F, Beguinot E, Martinet Y.

Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(e1):e39-44. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051513. Epub 2014 Jun 11.

PMID:
24920573
7.

Effects of first exposure to plain cigarette packaging on smoking behaviour and attitudes: a randomised controlled study.

Maynard OM, Leonards U, Attwood AS, Bauld L, Hogarth L, Munaf├▓ MR.

BMC Public Health. 2015 Mar 13;15:240. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1586-8.

8.

Effects of standardised cigarette packaging on craving, motivation to stop and perceptions of cigarettes and packs.

Brose LS, Chong CB, Aspinall E, Michie S, McEwen A.

Psychol Health. 2014;29(7):849-60. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.896915. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

PMID:
24559249
9.

American Spirit Pack Descriptors and Perceptions of Harm: A Crowdsourced Comparison of Modified Packs.

Pearson JL, Richardson A, Feirman SP, Villanti AC, Cantrell J, Cohn A, Tacelosky M, Kirchner TR.

Nicotine Tob Res. 2016 Aug;18(8):1749-56. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw097. Epub 2016 May 10.

PMID:
27170707
10.

How tobacco companies in the United Kingdom prepared for, and responded to, standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco.

Moodie C, Angus K, Mitchell D, Critchlow N.

Tob Control. 2018 Jul;27(e1):e85-e92. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054011. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

PMID:
29321273
11.

Misperceptions of harm among Natural American Spirit smokers: results from wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study (2013-2014).

Pearson JL, Johnson A, Villanti A, Glasser AM, Collins L, Cohn A, Rose SW, Niaura R, Stanton CA.

Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(e1):e61-e67. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053265. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

PMID:
27924008
12.

Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging.

Gallopel-Morvan K, Moodie C, Hammond D, Eker F, Beguinot E, Martinet Y.

Tob Control. 2012 Sep;21(5):502-6. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050079. Epub 2011 Oct 13.

PMID:
21998127
13.

The impact of structural packaging design on young adult smokers' perceptions of tobacco products.

Borland R, Savvas S, Sharkie F, Moore K.

Tob Control. 2013 Mar;22(2):97-102. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050078. Epub 2011 Dec 13.

PMID:
22166265
14.

Impact of smokeless tobacco packaging on perceptions and beliefs among youth, young adults, and adults in the U.S: findings from an internet-based cross-sectional survey.

Adkison SE, Bansal-Travers M, Smith DM, O'Connor RJ, Hyland AJ.

Harm Reduct J. 2014 Jan 17;11:2. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-11-2.

15.

The effects of variant descriptors on the potential effectiveness of plain packaging.

Borland R, Savvas S.

Tob Control. 2014 Jan;23(1):58-63. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050736. Epub 2013 Feb 22.

PMID:
23436139
16.

Perceptions of branded and plain cigarette packaging among Mexican youth.

Mutti S, Hammond D, Reid JL, White CM, Thrasher JF.

Health Promot Int. 2017 Aug 1;32(4):650-659. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav117.

17.

Eye movement data reveal increased attention to combined health warnings on cigarette packs.

Retzler C, Shiraj N, Retzler J.

Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Jan 1;194:336-340. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 17.

PMID:
30472573
18.

Socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers' ratings of plain and branded cigarette packaging: an experimental study.

Guillaumier A, Bonevski B, Paul C, Durkin S, D'Este C.

BMJ Open. 2014 Feb 6;4(2):e004078. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004078.

19.

Influence of premium versus value brand names on the smoking experience in a plain packaging environment: an experimental study.

Skaczkowski G, Durkin S, Kashima Y, Wakefield M.

BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 16;7(1):e014099. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014099.

20.

Has the introduction of plain packaging with larger graphic health warnings changed adolescents' perceptions of cigarette packs and brands?

White V, Williams T, Wakefield M.

Tob Control. 2015 Apr;24(Suppl 2):ii42-ii49. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052084. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

Supplemental Content

Support Center