Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 155

1.

Defending the scientific integrity of conservation-policy processes.

Carroll C, Hartl B, Goldman GT, Rohlf DJ, Treves A, Kerr JT, Ritchie EG, Kingsford RT, Gibbs KE, Maron M, Watson JEM.

Conserv Biol. 2017 Oct;31(5):967-975. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12958. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

PMID:
28741747
2.

The role of scientists in statutory interpretation of the U.S. Endangered Species Act.

Wilhere GF.

Conserv Biol. 2017 Apr;31(2):252-260. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12833. Epub 2016 Dec 19. Review.

PMID:
27601227
3.

American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.

American Society of Clinical Oncology.

J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. Epub 2003 Apr 29.

PMID:
12721281
4.

A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science-practice gap in ecology and conservation.

Bertuol-Garcia D, Morsello C, N El-Hani C, Pardini R.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):1032-1055. doi: 10.1111/brv.12385. Epub 2017 Nov 20. Review.

PMID:
29160024
5.

Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary.

Cook CN, Mascia MB, Schwartz MW, Possingham HP, Fuller RA.

Conserv Biol. 2013 Aug;27(4):669-78. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12050. Epub 2013 Apr 10.

6.

Politics and the erosion of federal scientific capacity: restoring scientific integrity to public health science.

Rest KM, Halpern MH.

Am J Public Health. 2007 Nov;97(11):1939-44. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

8.

Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities.

Brown MJ, Symonowicz C, Medina LV, Bratcher NA, Buckmaster CA, Klein H, Anderson LC.

In: Weichbrod RH, Thompson GAH, Norton JN, editors. Management of Animal Care and Use Programs in Research, Education, and Testing. 2nd edition. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2018. Chapter 2.

9.
10.

Inadvertent advocacy.

Wilhere GF.

Conserv Biol. 2012 Feb;26(1):39-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01805.x.

PMID:
22280324
11.
12.

Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.

Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S.

J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. Review.

PMID:
14698953
13.

Preferred conservation policies of shark researchers.

Shiffman DS, Hammerschlag N.

Conserv Biol. 2016 Aug;30(4):805-15. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12668. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

PMID:
26662225
14.

[The role of science in policy making--EuSANH-ISA project, framework for science advice for health].

Cianciara D, Piotrowicz M, Bielska-Lasota M, Wysocki MJ.

Przegl Epidemiol. 2012;66(3):521-9. Polish.

15.

Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species.

Camaclang AE, Maron M, Martin TG, Possingham HP.

Conserv Biol. 2015 Apr;29(2):482-92. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12428. Epub 2014 Dec 3.

PMID:
25472827
16.

Science, policy advocacy, and marine protected areas.

Gray NJ, Campbell LM.

Conserv Biol. 2009 Apr;23(2):460-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01093.x. Epub 2008 Nov 2.

PMID:
19016824
17.

The case for policy-relevant conservation science.

Rose DC.

Conserv Biol. 2015 Jun;29(3):748-54. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12444. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

18.

The role and value of conservation agency research.

Roux DJ, Kingsford RT, McCool SF, McGeoch MA, Foxcroft LC.

Environ Manage. 2015 Jun;55(6):1232-45. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0473-5. Epub 2015 Apr 4.

PMID:
25840698
19.

[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25. German.

PMID:
19034813
20.

Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.

Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.

Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

PMID:
18987905

Supplemental Content

Support Center